Illegal aliens are not criminals

I beleive there is a legal obligation to see to the welfare of the people with basic protections. Labor market protections by stemming invasion is legally encumbent upon the federal government.

It's also morally wrong to alter immigration policy just to destroy the labor market for citizens in certain sectors. H1-b visas are immoral in this way.

So you argue that immigration is a crime in the sense that is a moral offense. That's a different context and a different argument. That's fine. But saying that all illegal immigrants are criminals according to the law is not, because they are not.
 
So you argue that immigration is a crime in the sense that is a moral offense. That's a different context and a different argument. That's fine. But saying that all illegal immigrants are criminals according to the law is not, because they are not.

wtf....i already showed you the law where they are, now, show me the law where they are not
 
If you are referring to my insults, show me where those were posted without response to the points made. I don't care what you call me. But, if that's all you've got, then you've got nothing.

So posting an insult is part of your presentation when you're trying to convince others of your stance.
GEE, that makes sense. :good4u:

As I've stated elsewhere; you have become hard headed over accepting the situation the way it is, the examples you keep presenting are nothing more then fear mongering and hyper bol, and you offered no other solutions.

You seemed unable to understand that illegal is illegal.
Thus the reason I stopped having the discussion with you.
 
:palm:

Word games? You guys pretend that a criminal is on par with a simple violation of administrative rule and then claim I am playing word games?

At least you are somewhat honest about it. You think all immigrants are criminals and don't feed us bullshit about how you distinguish between the honest immigrants and the criminal immigrant.

"You think all immigrants are criminals..."
And yet, another straw man
 
It's not a strawman for nAHZi. His argument, seems to me, to clearly imply that he sees immigration as a crime in the context that it is a moral offense.

Then that's a discussion you should explore with AHZ; unless you're now trying to say that one person's opinion should be attibuted to everyone that doesn't agree with you, which you seem to be doing.
 
So posting an insult is part of your presentation when you're trying to convince others of your stance.
GEE, that makes sense. :good4u:

By the time I post the insult it is usually apparent to me that no amount of facts will convince the person because they do not care about the truth.

It is a fact that not all illegal immigrants are criminals. I have given you references showing that. If you continue to insist upon your ignorance I can no longer convince you.

As I've stated elsewhere; you have become hard headed over accepting the situation the way it is, the examples you keep presenting are nothing more then fear mongering and hyper bol, and you offered no other solutions.

You seemed unable to understand that illegal is illegal.
Thus the reason I stopped having the discussion with you.

It's fear mongering to assume that the cops are going to make mistakes? It is not fear mongering to associate someone guilty of failing to comply with some administrative rule with actual criminals? :good4u:

I have a problem with illegal? Funny, since I have referred to the group as "illegal aliens" or "illegally present" over and over again.

If you want to say, "all illegal aliens are illegal." Okay... Not sure you needed to repeat it, but that is correct. I won't tell you, you are wrong. I might pop off that you mean, "just like jaywalkers." But at least we would be past your falsehood.
 
Then that's a discussion you should explore with AHZ; unless you're now trying to say that one person's opinion should be attibuted to everyone that doesn't agree with you, which you seem to be doing.

I attributed it to no one but nAHZi. Where did I seem to be doing anything else? I said, "you." The context clearly shows that the pronoun was used to represent nAHZi. I did not say, "all of you" or in anyway imply a group. It was pretty clear that I distinguished nAHZi from the group as I gave him credit for being honest and separated him from the group.
 
how do you think they got here genius....i've already address your idiocy on this and apparently i am going to have to do so again

:palm:

Jesus Christ. Many illegal aliens entered legally and then fell out of compliance with immigration law. Arizona is going to conduct warrantless arrest of people based on probable cause of this great and horrific crime alone.

Illegal alien does not mean one who entered illegally. Some entered illegally, not all.
 
By the time I post the insult it is usually apparent to me that no amount of facts will convince the person because they do not care about the truth.

It is a fact that not all illegal immigrants are criminals. I have given you references showing that. If you continue to insist upon your ignorance I can no longer convince you.



It's fear mongering to assume that the cops are going to make mistakes? It is not fear mongering to associate someone guilty of failing to comply with some administrative rule with actual criminals? :good4u:

I have a problem with illegal? Funny, since I have referred to the group as "illegal aliens" or "illegally present" over and over again.

If you want to say, "all illegal aliens are illegal." Okay... Not sure you needed to repeat it, but that is correct. I won't tell you, you are wrong. I might pop off that you mean, "just like jaywalkers." But at least we would be past your falsehood.

We're getting back into something that I'm not going to continue and that's your continual circular argument.

Others have presented you with "rhyme and verse", which you have refused to accept as facts; but yet, you have decided that you no better then what's presented.

You're entitled to formulate your own opinion; but not to create your own facts.

Adios, again. :good4u:
 
I attributed it to no one but nAHZi. Where did I seem to be doing anything else? I said, "you." The context clearly shows that the pronoun was used to represent nAHZi. I did not say, "all of you" or in anyway imply a group. It was pretty clear that I distinguished nAHZi from the group as I gave him credit for being honest and separated him from the group.

But you seem to have overlooked that you and I were discussing your behavior; but you found it necessary to try and use someone else as an example/excuse. :good4u:
 
So posting an insult is part of your presentation when you're trying to convince others of your stance.
GEE, that makes sense. :good4u:

As I've stated elsewhere; you have become hard headed over accepting the situation the way it is, the examples you keep presenting are nothing more then fear mongering and hyper bol, and you offered no other solutions.

You seemed unable to understand that illegal is illegal.
Thus the reason I stopped having the discussion with you.

Solutions... I have offered them, but here is a solution to my primary concern...

How about we let a court determine who is illegally present and issue a warrant for them that could be executed by Arizona state police. What's the problem with that? Why do we need to risk an errant arrest of a citizen or legal immigrant based upon not having their papers (and we know skin color will enter into it, whether you choose to remain in denial or not)?
 
But you seem to have overlooked that you and I were discussing your behavior; but you found it necessary to try and use someone else as an example/excuse. :good4u:

What? Idiot, the post you responded to was made by me in response nAHZi. The post was not to you, did not include you and had nothing to do with any discussion between us. You chose to respond to it and made an error. As usual, you try to hide from your mistake instead of doing the honorable thing and saying... Ooops, my bad. That's part of the problem with you, sm, ditzy and many others. You look for the meaning that suits you and don't care about anything else.
 
:palm:

Jesus Christ. Many illegal aliens entered legally and then fell out of compliance with immigration law. Arizona is going to conduct warrantless arrest of people based on probable cause of this great and horrific crime alone.

Illegal alien does not mean one who entered illegally. Some entered illegally, not all.

if they are here past their legal status, then they are in violation of the law, they can be detained and deported....you're clueless here
 
if they are here past their legal status, then they are in violation of the law, they can be detained and deported....you're clueless here

Yep, but it does not mean they entered illegally as you continue to ignorantly maintain. They are guilty of a civil violation of the law and I have not argued otherwise.
 
if they are here past their legal status, then they are in violation of the law, they can be detained and deported....you're clueless here

Also, Federal agents are NOT allowed to make a warrantless arrests of them based on probable cause of illegal presence alone. The Arizona law grants that power to state leos. If the Arizona law were in compliance with the federal laws on this my argument goes away.

Get a warrant, go round them up and ship them out. I have no problem with that.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top