IBDaMann
Well-known member
If this were true, one would expect life to be prevalent wherever entropy is prevalent.
Guess what....
Ignorance and the Bible
- Thread starter domer76
- Start date
Guess what....
Embarrassingly dumb logic.
Life is favored in the presence of organic chemistry.
Does one expect life anywhere and everywhere there are organic molecules?
Guess what...
IBDaMann
Well-known member
I have really bad news for you; the shitty logic is your regurgitation of "entropy favors biological life." That is the stupidest comment this week on JPP. Congratulations. I can only imagine that you thought that statement was somehow brilliant because you had no idea what any of it really means but that it sounded "deep". My comment was a polite way of pointing out the stupidity of your regurgitation, but you couldn't take the hint, i.e. you needed greater elaboration.
First, entropy is not organic chemistry; that was a stupid pivot. Life is not favored. Nothing is favored. Entropy, not only doesn't favor anything, it destroys everything. All matter in the universe will eventually "evaporate" (atoms will decay into subatomic dust, black holes will evaporate via Hawking radiation) leaving nothing. Nothing is what is favored.
Yes, by definition. If you were to learn what an organic molecule is, you wouldn't ask such a stupid question.
So, the correct answer is that the only thing that favors biological life is the set of conditions necessary for biological life. Nothing else favors biological life. Don't be so gullible.
No, your comment was an embarrassingly sad and erroneous attempt at "reasoning".
You didn't realize how spurious your "reasoning" was until I pointed it out to you.
Carbon favors life. Sunlight favors life.
Does that mean that anywhere and everywhere there is carbon and sunlight we can expect life?
Guess what....
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Says the guy who has no concept of critical reasoning, who believes everything written on the internet is true, and who simply regurgitates whatever he frantically Googles to remain within his two-minute time limit.
Nope. Even after I provided you the correct answer, you still can't get it right. Too funny.
I see you are avoiding, backpedaling, retreating from your original train of "reasoning" that anywhere and everywhere there happens to be entropy, carbon, sunlight, and/or organic molecules we have to conclude life exists.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
You totally changed everything. I guess when you are babbling, your divergence can literally go in any direction.
I recommend you limit your discussions to material you actually understand. I realize that will greatly limit your posting, but your contributions will stand a much greater chance of being value-added.
Since you have now run away from, backpedaled, retreated and avoided your original embarrassingly flawed "reasoning" in post #1801, I am satisfied with how this tangent of posts has concluded.
Phyllis Diller
Was it me?
If you really thought I was an idiot, you would not be investing extensive amounts of time reading and responding to my posts and threads.
I invest very little time in posters here whom I genuinely consider barely educated idiots.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Fredo is one of those I consider to be irrational if not having "a legitimate clinical mental disability".
He has some loose screws for sure!Fredo is one of those I consider to be irrational if not having "a legitimate clinical mental disability".
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
I just noted on my alerts page that this is what is happening:
This is unsettling. Someone has some self-control issues.
Perry, you're old enough to know that if you play stupid games, you'll win stupid prizes. Grow up and quit whining, son.
The day you apologize for being a troll, a stalker and a liar, is a day I doubt will ever come. You lack the spine and intelligence for it.
Last edited:
Guno צְבִי
We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
Guno צְבִי
We fight, We win, Am Yisrael Chai
- Arianism: Argued that the Son of God was not co-eternal with the Father and was subordinate to Him.
- Modalism (or Sabellianism): Proposed that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit were different aspects of one God, rather than distinct persons.
- Adoptionism: The belief that Jesus was an ordinary man who was "adopted" as the Son of God at his baptism or at some other point in his life.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Lots of Christians killing Christians in those disputes.
“All in favor of one big god and a couple of lesser gods, say aye.”
(Some AYEs)
“All in favor of one god, but three different dudes, say AYE.”
(More AYEs)
“One god, three dudes wins!”
“All who understand what the fuck one god, three dudes means, say AYE.”
(Silence)