IF your on the FBI's terrorist watch list, should you be free to own an AK?

NOVA said:
As the NSSF had warned, Senator Dianne Feinstein introduced two pieces of legislation yesterday (one amendment to an existing bill and another as a stand-alone bill) that would have stripped Americans of their Constitutional right to own firearms if they appear on a secret government list — a list that even the New York Times and the ACLU have called unconstitutional and dangerous. Once again, Senator Feinstein doesn’t actually seem to care about Constitutionally protected rights, whether they’re enumerated in the Second or Fifth Amendment. There is some good news, though, in that DiFi’s amendment died a quick death on the Senate floor, but the Democrats have continued to press their talking point that this so-called “terror gap” is somehow allowing terrorists to purchase guns ...

There’s an interesting wrinkle here: the notion that the Attorney General can block the sale if they believe the weapon will be used in an “act of terrorism.” It seems innocuous until you realize that the recent strategy of the Democrat party is to call every incident of “gun violence” an act of “domestic terrorism.” Since they are similarly convinced that the only purpose of buying a firearm is to murder innocent people, it stands to reason that the AG can use this logic to summarily stop all gun sales in the entire United States without any oversight. For those of us who are interested in seeing due process be followed before any restriction of Americans’ Constitutional rights that’s a fairly disturbing concept.

Poor LeontheMoron....
Click to expand...

So you want to see more terrorists attack within America.
Got it!
Poor BLABO
 
daily%20news%20nra%20sick%20jihad.jpg



Terrorist+NRA.jpg
 
The measure has been introduced repeatedly since 2007. Why didn’t Democrats pass it in 2009 or 2010, when they owned Congress and the White House?

roflmao.gif
roflmao.gif
roflmao.gif
roflmao.gif

 
Faux News fearmongers, and the nutbase responds:

Anita Jefferson didn't know much about San Bernardino, California, before the apparent terror attack there. The West Coast town is nearly the exact same size as her hometown of Birmingham and hardly a high-profile target like New York or Paris.

Now, she finds herself worried about the possibility of an attack at a location like the suburban shopping mall where Jefferson works at a food kiosk for the Christmas shopping season. A place that's public but, unlike stadiums and other venues, has relatively lax security.

"You'd think they'd go to a larger place, but a smaller place may be easier," said Jefferson, 62.

The FBI announced Friday that it was investigating the mass shooting that left 14 people dead at a Christmas party as an act of terrorism. The couple who carried out the shooting, Syed Farook and his wife, Tashfeen Malik, died in a gunbattle with police.

If there could be a terror attack at a social services center in San Bernardino, why not suburban Alabama, or downtown Louisville, Kentucky? The bloody attack made it all too obvious for some Americans that big cities with marquee names aren't the only potential targets.

"I can honestly say I don't feel as safe," said Tim Harrington, 50, of Jacksonville, Florida, while touring a museum in Louisville.

There is plenty of security at the suburban Birmingham mall — "and they're awesome," said Lindsay Alexander, 18, who also works there and feels safe. But her comfort level isn't what it was a few days ago.

"It could happen here," said Alexander. "They could just pick something random."


http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/12/05/is-anywhere-safe-san-bernardino-mass-shooting-raises-fears-attack-in-smaller/

Islamophobia (or anti-Muslim sentiment) is the prejudice against, hatred towards, or fear of the religion of Islam or Muslims.
 
While I reluctantly agree with some of the left on this one, where we part company is that I don't think the law would have served as an impediment to 'terrorists' [lol] getting assault weapons---had it been passed.

In fact, it's the tired old 'hey look voters, we just voted to make you safer' by politicians. Anyone, 'terrorist' [lol] or otherwise, who is determined to get an assault weapon can get one.

You 'can't get them' in France, and look how that turned out.
 
Jarod said:
Seriously should we be allowing those on the terrorist watch list to waltz into Gander Mountain and buy as many Assault Rifles as they want?

As many armor piercing bullets as they chose?


I believe in Due Process, but cant a system be set up to give Due Process but still prevent those on the list from having 25 Assault Rifles in their basement?

We do it for mentally ill people, don't we?
Click to expand...

What other Constitutional rights do you want to deny them? Just guns?

I wish I could believe that you are really concerned about terrorism. But you aren't. This is nothing more than a cynical ploy to advance your anti gun agenda. You merely hide behind terrorism.

On one hand you tell us that the risk of terrorism is very low. That ISIS isn't coming here to kill us. Now all of a sudden you are telling us that the risk is so great we must eliminate constitutional protections.

So answer this question. Do you think that we are at risk from islamic terrorism such that we need to employ these constitutional limitations?
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
While I reluctantly agree with some of the left on this one, where we part company is that I don't think the law would have served as an impediment to 'terrorists' [lol] getting assault weapons---had it been passed. In fact, it's the tired old 'hey look voters, we just voted to make you safer' by politicians. Anyone, 'terrorist' [lol] or otherwise, who is determined to get an assault weapon can get one. You 'can't get them' in France, and look how that turned out.
Click to expand...

You love the NRA because the make it easy for you, don't you, jihadist?
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
While I reluctantly agree with some of the left on this one, where we part company is that I don't think the law would have served as an impediment to 'terrorists' [lol] getting assault weapons---had it been passed.

In fact, it's the tired old 'hey look voters, we just voted to make you safer' by politicians. Anyone, 'terrorist' [lol] or otherwise, who is determined to get an assault weapon can get one.

You 'can't get them' in France, and look how that turned out.
Click to expand...

Don't fall for their ploy. This is nothing but a cynical effort to advance their anti gun agenda. Just after Paris they were telling us that we have nothing to worry about from islamic terrorism. Now all of a sudden they are in gun grabbing mode over islamic terrorism?

Sorry. Not buying it. Maybe if they weren't so obvious? Maybe if they were advancing these principles at times other than a shooting event?

You know they never want to let a good crisis go to waste and lately they have been wasting a few. They must be very frustrating. Poor Legion Abdulla has poop swastikas all over his face from embarrassment.
 
I Love America said:
What other Constitutional rights do you want to deny them? Just guns? I wish I could believe that you are really concerned about terrorism. But you aren't. This is nothing more than a cynical ploy to advance your anti gun agenda. You merely hide behind terrorism. On one hand you tell us that the risk of terrorism is very low. That ISIS isn't coming here to kill us. Now all of a sudden you are telling us that the risk is so great we must eliminate constitutional protections.
So answer this question. Do you think that we are at risk from islamic terrorism such that we need to employ these constitutional limitations?
Click to expand...

It's cute that your panty-pissing fear of Muslims makes you think they're the only terrorists who want to kill.
 
Jarod said:
Seriously should we be allowing those on the terrorist watch list to waltz into Gander Mountain and buy as many Assault Rifles as they want?

As many armor piercing bullets as they chose?


I believe in Due Process, but cant a system be set up to give Due Process but still prevent those on the list from having 25 Assault Rifles in their basement?

We do it for mentally ill people, don't we?
Click to expand...

have those on the 'watchlist' been convicted of any crimes?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top