But you didn't say that he controls whether it hits the floor. You said that he has to schedule a vote first. He doesn't.
More picking of nits. He controls what hits that floor.
Not true. If Harry doesn't want it, it will not get there.Any Senator.
But you didn't say that he controls whether it hits the floor. You said that he has to schedule a vote first. He doesn't.
Not true. If Harry doesn't want it, it will not get there.Any Senator.
More picking of nits. He controls what hits that floor.
Not true. If Harry doesn't want it, it will not get there.
If Congress really wanted it to pass today, it could be passed today regardless of whether it was scheduled for a vote. The bottom line is that Congress doesn't want to pass it today so any efforts to do so would be futile.
Any Senator could get the bill to the floor, but every Senator would have to agree. If any Senator doesn't want it to get there it would not. Because every Senator does not want the bill to reach the floor today, it wouldn't make it.
If Congress wants to act quickly, it can. If everyone in Congress loved Obama and this bill, it could be on his desk tomorrow.
Again, the only way it hits the floor today is if Harry puts it there. It isn't true that "any Senator" can do that, not without his blessing.
Basically, if they want a vote now, Harry has to do more than just sponsor it, he needs to put it up for a vote or get a lackey to do it. If, say, a republican decided they wanted to vote on a different bill "right now" how successful would they be?
(BTW I'm not surprised that you are apologizing for Obama playing on the ignorance of Americans).
Any Senator could conceivably bring the bill to a vote on the floor of the Senate today by unanimous consent, but if any Senator objected he or she would not be successful. If Congress wanted to, the bill could be on Obama's desk tomorrow.
The Patriot Act was introduced on October 23, 2001 and was presented to the President two days later.
And again, the only person that can do that without that "unanimous consent" is Harry. I'll ask again, if a republican wanted to vote on a bill today without Harry's support could they get a bill up to a vote? Be honest.
Pretending that Obama isn't playing on the ignorance of his worshipers right now is disingenuous.
If you loved him you'd get Harry to bring it up for a vote, because it isn't getting there otherwise and he wants it "passed now"...
The only chance in hell this thing will pass is if Obama can use the media into bullying congress and scaring the shit out of everybody. There are a lot of top democrats who will not sign on to this bill, even they don't like the tax the rich and spend another half a Trillion dollars scheme that Obama has laid out for them.
If it passes, maybe I should just fire myself and go on unemployment. why work?
The average unemployment check is 300 dollars a week. I make a lot more than that and I could not pay my bills or enjoy any decent lifestyle on that pittance. Judging by your posts, I would totally believe that you do not make more than this tiny amount.
Conclusion: In your case there appears to be no compelling reason to work. I don't mind your going on unemployment instead of slaving away for such low wages. Feel free.
Superfreak isn't in an "Obama war" that's just a nonsense phrase used in an attempt to defend a desperate plea from a President. It literally makes no sense.
I didn't "ascribe meaning" I mentioned words you used then made an observation of your style of "argument"...
SuperFreak's posting threads against Obama continously. I am pointing it out. Not a war? whatever, an assault.
By the way, here's a transcript for the relevant part of Obama's remarks:
Something's pathetic, but I'm not sure it's Barack Obama.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press...dent-american-jobs-act-raleigh-north-carolina
Not an assault either.... each of those stories came from realclearpolitics.com. I can't help the fact Obama sucks at his job and the media is reporting on it.
I do admit, the one today was a bit hackish to post.... I just couldn't resist due to the "If you love me, help me" portion of his comments. Even taken into full context as Dung demonstrated.... it is still highly mock worthy.
how is obama not pathetic to say this?
Because this has to do with Weiner, not Obama
SuperFreak's posting threads against Obama continously. I am pointing it out. Not a war? whatever, an assault.
Better report him at his uber special "attack" website so that you can have an official record and they'll know where to send the brute squad.
I am the brute squad.