That pretty much puts your thread to rest now.
Avoiding it? I am right here...
He (is alledged to have) colluded with wiki and with members of the campaign to get stolen emails distributed to the public.
Are you stupid enough to deny this?
I dont know why, based on the facts in the indictment, he was not charged with conspiracy to distribute stolen documents.
That pretty much puts your thread to rest now.
No it doesn't. Do the facts detail a collusion? No magic words necessary.
make your case for collusion.I see the Trump apologists are avoiding this..
To be expected. They would just rather just type "no collusion" and run.
Do the charges of the indictment clearly state collusion? No they do not. Those are not "magic" words, those are necessary words.
That pretty much puts your thread to rest now.
It does not allege Stone conspired with anyone but suggests his mission was to find out how the stolen material would be made public — something that, on its own, would not necessarily constitute a crime.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.7799885b4e0d
Appears you are wrong, as usual.
make your case for collusion.
Stone did not contact WIKI -so that's out and the info he gave to the "Trump campaign" was public knowledge
I’m sure if Mullet could have wrung a collusion-crime out of it, he would have lol.
But the feds went in, guns a slinging at 4 am, to nab an alleged 66 year old liar. What do they do with drug lords? Send the Third Armored Division?
make your case for collusion.
Stone did not contact WIKI -so that's out and the info he gave to the "Trump campaign" was public knowledge
Even if Stone did contact Wiki, so what?
This is still yet more of Mullet charging people with lying about non-crimes. Someone needs to put a stop to it.
It is collusion, again... if he contacted Assuage.
So, simply talking with Assange about the emails *he stole* is collusion?
I’m pretty sure that’s not even a crime—much less, the kind of crime you’re desperately looking for.
I did not say it was a crime, I said it was collusion.
Even if Stone did contact Wiki, so what?
This is still yet more of Mullet charging people with lying about non-crimes. Someone needs to put a stop to it...
Speaking of Assange: since Julian Assange is such a critical piece of the collusion puzzle, why isn’t Mullet falling all over himself to get him interviewed?
Afraid he’ll ‘say the wrong things’?