Into the Night
Verified User
Unit error. Time itself is not a quantity, Hugo.No. You assume your position to criticize the other.
There is no such thing as an "infinite amount of time."
Unit error. Time itself is not a quantity, Hugo.No. You assume your position to criticize the other.
There is no such thing as an "infinite amount of time."
The Theory of the Big Bang is not a theory of science, Sybil. Religion is not science.That's not what the scientists who advocate an eternal universe are saying:
Older, and Aristotle did not make this argument.I am not a scientist. The concept of the universe always existing is at least as old as Aristotle.
A universe has no day or night, Gunky.What is special about today?
I don't ask that to be problematic but rather to point up the concept that if the universe is infinite in time then any point along that time line is as likely as any other.
Which means today is possibly the ONLY day that does exist.
And I haven't even taken an edible today!
Nothing's special.What is special about today?
Nothing's special.
But calling today either special, or typical is not an explanation for how we could have somehow gone through an infinite number of days to arrive at today. Infinity is uncountable. It literally does not have a quantifiable limit or value.
That is a logical paradox independent of what kind of value we assign to today.
A universe has no day or night, Gunky.
We use Earth-based time units to define the age of the universe at 13.7 billion years.The universe has no day or night, Sybil.
The universe has no day or night. There is no paradox.Nothing's special.
But calling today either special, or typical is not an explanation for how we could have somehow gone through an infinite number of days to arrive at today. Infinity is uncountable. It literally does not have a quantifiable limit or value.
That is a logical paradox independent of what kind of value we assign to today.
You should. There is no paradox.I'm still struggling to see it as a "paradox".
That's certainly one way to put it!It is like saying that the set of Real Numbers is infinite so I can't possibly have "5" of anything.
Time is not entropy. Entropy is not time. Entropy stays in the same for the universe. It does not increase.Further we know time passes (as we define it by entropy) so if today is separable from yesterday then of course there is a "today" that is unique.
I'll comment where I please, Gunky. You just have a bad case of bulverism.Please leave this thread alone. It is interesting. You make everything more horrible.
And how do you arrive at this magickal number?We use Earth-based time units to define the age of the universe at 13.7 billion years.
Earth has only existed for a short time. What about when Earth didn't exist?That should tell you that, prior to this thread, nobody ever had a problem with using Earth-based time units to describe cosmic ages.
This is simple.I'm still struggling to see it as a "paradox". It is like saying that the set of Real Numbers is infinite so I can't possibly have "5" of anything.
Further we know time passes (as we define it by entropy) so if today is separable from yesterday then of course there is a "today" that is unique.
Earth has only existed for 4.5 billion years. The universe is supposed to be 13.7 billion years old.Earth has only existed for a short time. What about when Earth didn't exist?
How do you know, Sybil? You are just making up numbers again. Argument from randU fallacy.Earth has only existed for 4.5 billion years. The universe is supposed to be 13.7 billion years old.
Who is 'we'? Are you having another schizophrenic episode, Sybil?We still use Earth-based time units to measure times for when Earth didn't exist.
You don't get to speak for everyone, Sybil. Omniscience fallacy.And prior to this thread, nobody ever questioned that.
You can't blame your problems on me or anybody else, Sybil.So your goal and motivation here is to just be an annoying contrarian.
The universe has no day or night, Sybil.This is simple.
Infinity is uncountable.
Counting requires a numerical origin point and a numerical end point.
There is no origin point in an infinitely old universe to count forward from until it reaches today.
There is no 'arrow of time' anywhere in physics where entropy is not changing, Sybil.The arrow of time in physics is based on the Past Hypothesis - that there was a fixed time in the past having an initial low entropy state which evolved to a higher entropy state today. That concept is not supporting an infinitely old universe
How do we describe 14 billion years ago, then?The universe is supposed to be 13.7 billion years old.
Prior to this thread, you never, ever, under any circumstances complained about using Earth-based time units to describe cosmic age scales.The universe has no day or night, Sybil.
We have a fairly good handle on the expansion rates of the universe, so we just run the clock backwards until the universe reaches it's initial hot, ultra dense state.How do we describe 14 billion years ago, then?
Yes. That gives us the exploding dot.We have a fairly good handle on the expansion rates of the universe, so we just run the clock backwards until the universe reaches it's initial hot, ultra dense state.