If God were real, you wouldn’t need a book

As I said earlier, there are 20 different Biblical claims
So now you're up from 11 to 20, yet you haven't even made a single legitimate point about any of them...
that fly in the face of what we know
You are but one single person. The proper pronoun is I, not we.
from science and physics
You can't disprove miracles via science and physics.
and your answer for all of them is either ridiculous speculation (maybe there were carcases just laying around!)
What's so ridiculous about it? Have you never seen a crop field after receded flood waters? I have. I've seen raptors feasting on all sorts of dead fish there.
or to invoke your sky wizard as though the various laws of physics and scientific realities suddenly don't apply on Earth because the sky wizard somehow turns them off.
I would think that the creator of the heavens and the earth would know how all things within his creation work... or do you suppose that you know more than the creator of said things knows? When are you going to prove that miracles never occur?
I don't ever want to hear shit about how pro-science you are. It's all a lie.
Does pro-science require anti-religion?
 
LOL. Irony that we are here on a thread in which a couple of believers of various stripes are doing NOTHING BUT DEMONIZING and MISCHARACTERIZING ATHEISM. And one of them whines that only atheists ever speak against belief.

As if this thread isn't evidence that atheists are hated and feared by the believers.
 
Who is saying that?
ZenMode.
Seriously, who is making that positive claim?
ZenMode.
Because the atheists that you fear the most
I don't fear atheists. I don't fear Church of No God members either.
are the ones who merely fail to believe the claims of a God.
Do you likewise "fail to believe" that gods don't exist?
That's a very different thing. But you'd have to be a LOT smarter to understand the difference.
Do you believe that gods exist?
Do you believe that gods DON'T exist?
 
It's actually pretty funny how you, @Into the Night and @gfm7175 claim to be all about science one minute and then, when your religious beliefs clearly fly in the face of scientific feasibility, you literally start pulling nonsense out of your asses without breaking stride.
Science isn't a 'feasability'.
All of you are playing tennis without the net.
Cliche fallacy. Go learn English.
 
No backflips or gymnastics, just a reasonable extrapolation based on human life expectancy.
Human life expectancy has varied widely. You are extrapolating random numbers and trying to use them as 'data'.
Argument from randU fallacy.
As I said earlier, there are 20 different Biblical claims that fly in the face of what we know from science and physics
Zero. Argument from randU fallacy.
Illiteracy: Plural used for singular.
False dichotomy fallacy.
and your answer for all of them is either ridiculous speculation (maybe there were carcases just laying around!) or to invoke your sky wizard as though the various laws of physics and scientific realities suddenly don't apply on Earth because the sky wizard somehow turns them off.
No theory of science is violated.
God knows far more science than any of us.
Go learn what 'science' is.
False dichotomy fallacy.
I don't ever want to hear shit about how pro-science you are. It's all a lie.
Science is not politics. False dichotomy fallacy. Go learn what 'science' is.
 
One of my social groups is comprised of Lutherans, I have never heard any of them say anything about atheists. Another social group I'm in are all non-theists and one almost can't get through one meeting without hearing something derogatory about Christians.

Now I have no experience with the fire-and-brimstone fundamentalists; for all I know they might be howling and hand wringing about the scourge of atheism! lol
Those of us that play with fire and brimstone have a great time! You can often see us working at some fireworks display. New Years eve is a popular time for cities and towns to hire us.

I am no fundamentalist. I understand my religion is based on faith, and faith alone.
 
One of my social groups is comprised of Lutherans, I have never heard any of them say anything about atheists. Another social group I'm in are all non-theists and one almost can't get through one meeting without hearing something derogatory about Christians.
Sounds about right.

In fact, I attend a Lutheran church (but that term in and of itself is a rather broad one, as plenty of Lutheran churches have unfortunately "conformed to the world" [disregarding the "uncomfortable" portions of The Bible] while other Lutheran churches still view The Bible as the ultimate authority (and don't attempt to change it to conform to "the world").

For instance, the ELCA is a very "worldly" Lutheran denomination. They ignore (or otherwise make their own adjustments to) what The Bible says about women pastors, abortion, marriage, and a host of other topics. Meanwhile, the WELS is a very "biblical" Lutheran denomination. They don't allow for women to be pastors, they stand against abortion, they adhere to God's design for marriage, and they otherwise view The Bible as the ultimate authority on all matters.

They are both "Lutheran", but they hold VERY different views on "the issues".
Now I have no experience with the fire-and-brimstone fundamentalists; for all I know they might be howling and hand wringing about the scourge of atheism! lol
As far as my church goes, we're not "howling and hand wringing" about the "scourge of atheism" (or the Church of No God for that matter). In a very basic sense, we generally confess our sins, worship God through song, go through some Bible readings, listen to a sermon relating to those Bible readings, pray about all sorts of stuff, partake in Holy Communion, and fellowship with each other.
 
Last edited:
Human life expectancy has varied widely. You are extrapolating random numbers and trying to use them as 'data'.
No human life expectancy would make the estimated age of the Earth, based on the geneologies in the Bible, make sense.
Argument from randU fallacy.
Nope.
Zero. Argument from randU fallacy.
Illiteracy: Plural used for singular.
False dichotomy fallacy.
Incoherent babbling.
No theory of science is violated.
Blatant lie.
God knows far more science than any of us.
Lie and irrelevant.
Go learn what 'science' is.
False dichotomy fallacy.
Incoherent babbling.
Science is not politics.
In other news, cars aren't polar bears.
False dichotomy fallacy. Go learn what 'science' is.
Incoherent babbling.
 
Back
Top