LichGold
Verified User
Yeah that's the plan you can gfys anytime now.
I Hate Trump. You Should Too.
- Thread starter Highlight
- Start date
Trumpet
Verified User
LichGold
Verified User
"Hey moron, it isn't the Democrats blocking the release of the Epstein files."
Being nailed supporting this verifiably false claim, but you're still fagging off at me pretending im interested in you..... So shamelessly faggoty
Yall blocked it several times and had 12 years to release it yourselves.
What's your excuse? Your own imaginary homoeroticism?
View: https://x.com/TheThe1776/status/1959272119155802523
Being nailed supporting this verifiably false claim, but you're still fagging off at me pretending im interested in you..... So shamelessly faggoty
Yall blocked it several times and had 12 years to release it yourselves.
What's your excuse? Your own imaginary homoeroticism?
View: https://x.com/TheThe1776/status/1959272119155802523
Trumpet
Verified User
Trumpian truth you mean.
LichGold
Verified User
Trump + champion + truth
That's what i meant all along...
You're not as dumb as you look....
Total faggot tho.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
If you have to ask, you don't know what you're babbling about.
LichGold
Verified User
And if he did, he'd know it was really really gay.
Trumpet
Verified User
If I have to ask you if you know what you are babbling, then I don't know what I am babbling about. Now that makes a lot of sense.
Trumpet
Verified User
You go around propositioning others, and then you call others faggots.
LichGold
Verified User
You're delusional AND you're a faggot. I just bulldoze right through you with all the respect a faggot deserves.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
Welcome to the forum, Highlight! I can already tell that we will be in strong disagreement with each other, but that's where the fun is at. 
To illustrate what Team Donkey does about this topic:
"THE POOR" -- paid $10 in taxes before, now pays $9 in taxes. A $1 reduction. A 10% reduction.
"THE MIDDLE CLASS" -- paid $100 in taxes before, now pays $90 in taxes. A $10 reduction. A 10% reduction.
"THE WEALTHY" -- paid $1000 in taxes before, now pays $900 in taxes. A $100 reduction. A 10% reduction.
Team Donkey propaganda: "OMGzzzzzz, "THE WEALTHY" got ONE HUNDRED FREAKING DOLLARS in tax breaks, but "THE POOR" only got ONE MEASLY DOLLAR in tax breaks.... "TAX BREAKS FOR THE WEALTHY!!!!!!!" RAHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!
Common sense: It looks like everyone received a 10% tax break. Seems fair to me.
Those sort of cuts would be supported by anyone with common sense (as those cuts are VERY beneficial to the people who are LEGITIMATELY receiving those benefits due to paying into the system for their whole working lives).
There's also a lot of nuances surrounding the term "the poor". Nobody is stuck "being poor".
A very good question. I see no reason to hate him, so I'd love to hear a valid reason.
This is a vague (and purposely misleading) generalization that Team Donkey always screams to the high heavens with regard to any Team Elephant candidate, no matter the candidate's actual actions/policies. It also gets into Team Donkey's purposeful conflation of the mathematical concepts 'total (raw)' and 'total (percentage)'. It is also a prime example of Team Donkey's general tactic of 'lying by omission', completely omitting any and all of the "poor" and "middle class" tax breaks in favor of tunnel vision towards any and all of the "wealthy" tax breaks. They also never unambiguously define what these words mean ("poor", "middle class", "wealthy").
To illustrate what Team Donkey does about this topic:
"THE POOR" -- paid $10 in taxes before, now pays $9 in taxes. A $1 reduction. A 10% reduction.
"THE MIDDLE CLASS" -- paid $100 in taxes before, now pays $90 in taxes. A $10 reduction. A 10% reduction.
"THE WEALTHY" -- paid $1000 in taxes before, now pays $900 in taxes. A $100 reduction. A 10% reduction.
Team Donkey propaganda: "OMGzzzzzz, "THE WEALTHY" got ONE HUNDRED FREAKING DOLLARS in tax breaks, but "THE POOR" only got ONE MEASLY DOLLAR in tax breaks.... "TAX BREAKS FOR THE WEALTHY!!!!!!!" RAHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!
Common sense: It looks like everyone received a 10% tax break. Seems fair to me.
This is another favored Team Donkey talking point that is vague and purposefully leaves out key information. What cuts, specifically? Is this cuts to fraud/waste/abuse that is due to bad information "on the books" (e.g. "a 150 year old woman" "receiving a SS check")? Is this cuts to illegal alien invaders receiving a SS check?
Those sort of cuts would be supported by anyone with common sense (as those cuts are VERY beneficial to the people who are LEGITIMATELY receiving those benefits due to paying into the system for their whole working lives).
In the above examples, "the poor" are being treated well. They're receiving the same 10% tax break as everyone else as well as receiving the same benefits to having waste/fraud/abuse removed from the SS system.
There's also a lot of nuances surrounding the term "the poor". Nobody is stuck "being poor".
Are you proposing "Robin Hood" in response to that? Is "Robin Hood" fair treatment?
Is all such "funding" necessary? Is there waste/fraud/abuse that could be trimmed off the edges? Should some of those government agencies even exist in the first place? Maybe "the poor" wouldn't be so poor if their money wasn't constantly siphoned away to fund all sorts of government waste/fraud/abuse? The Trump Administration might announce a "no federal income tax" policy sometime next year. That would help out "the poor" and "the middle class" immensely!
I do.
I typically don't bother with anyone's video links. For discussions on JPP, I prefer to stick to text (and to the poster's own arguments, not just a link to someone else's arguments).
Well, not when it's presented with THAT attitude, anyway.
Put it into your own words/arguments. As I said, I typically don't bother with videos or links to other people's arguments.
LichGold
Verified User
Welcome to the forum, Highlight! I can already tell that we will be in strong disagreement with each other, but that's where the fun is at.
A very good question. I see no reason to hate him, so I'd love to hear a valid reason.
This is a vague (and purposely misleading) generalization that Team Donkey always screams to the high heavens with regard to any Team Elephant candidate, no matter the candidate's actual actions/policies. It also gets into Team Donkey's purposeful conflation of the mathematical concepts 'total (raw)' and 'total (percentage)'. It is also a prime example of Team Donkey's general tactic of 'lying by omission', completely omitting any and all of the "poor" and "middle class" tax breaks in favor of solely recognizing any and all of the "wealthy" tax breaks. They also never unambiguously define what these words mean ("poor", "middle class", "wealthy").
To illustrate what Team Donkey does about this topic:
"THE POOR" -- paid $10 in taxes before, now pays $9 in taxes. A $1 reduction. A 10% reduction.
"THE MIDDLE CLASS" -- paid $100 in taxes before, now pays $90 in taxes. A $10 reduction. A 10% reduction.
"THE WEALTHY" -- paid $1000 in taxes before, now pays $900 in taxes. A $100 reduction. A 10% reduction.
Team Donkey propaganda: "OMGzzzzzz, "THE WEALTHY" got ONE HUNDRED FREAKING DOLLARS in tax breaks, but "THE POOR" only got ONE MEASLY DOLLAR in tax breaks.... "TAX BREAKS FOR THE WEALTHY!!!!!!!" RAHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!
Common sense: It looks like everyone received a 10% tax break. Seems fair to me.
This is another favored Team Donkey talking point that is vague and purposefully leaves out key information. What cuts, specifically? Is this cuts to fraud/waste/abuse due to bad information (e.g. "150 year old woman" "receiving a SS check") Is this cuts to illegal alien invaders receiving a SS check?
Those sort of cuts would be supported by anyone with common sense (as those cuts are VERY beneficial to the people who are LEGITIMATELY receiving those benefits due to paying into the system for their whole working lives).
In the above examples, "the poor" are being treated well. They're receiving the same 10% tax break as everyone else as well as receiving the same benefits to having waste/fraud/abuse removed from the SS system.
There's also a lot of nuances surrounding the term "the poor". Nobody is stuck "being poor".
Are you proposing "Robin Hood" in response to that? Is "Robin Hood" fair treatment?
Is all such "funding" necessary? Is there waste/fraud/abuse that could be trimmed off the edges? Should some of those government agencies even exist in the first place? Maybe "the poor" wouldn't be so poor if their money wasn't constantly siphoned away to fund all sorts of government waste/fraud/abuse? The Trump Administration might announce a "no federal income tax" policy sometime next year. That would help out "the poor" and "the middle class" immensely!
I do.
I typically don't bother with anyone's video links. For discussions on JPP, I prefer to stick to text (and to the poster's own arguments, not just a link to someone else's arguments).
Well, not when it's presented with THAT attitude, anyway.
Put it into your own words/arguments. As I said, I typically don't bother with videos or links to other people's arguments.
Face it, you hate him for the same reason you hate putin, transy politics.
And no other reason.
gfm7175
Mega MAGA
What do you consider to be "well off"?
Yes, I did love the tax breaks that the Trump Admin gave me. I'm looking forward to receiving more during Trump 2.0 ... There's already tax breaks being given re: overtime work, tip work, and social security. Those either don't (or hardly) affect me personally, but for the people who ARE affected, that'll be nice for them.
