I can't believe the proggies here have forced me to defend a Trump comment.....

Trump's comment was not ambiguous.

Have you even listened to it? He says it in the middle of comments about the auto industry, but it's not about the auto industry. He even says that what will happen to the auto industry is the "least" of it.

I'm really not sure how anyone can misinterpret that, or not see that pretty defining qualifier.

:rolleyes:

:chuckle::magagrin:
 
No, YOU are. Nomad is simply being honest about this. You and BidenPresident are perfect examples of what libtards do to other libtards whenever they even ever so slightly stray off from the "leftist group think" "approved narrative".


This thread isn't about 1/6/21. Please stay focused.


You should take your own advice. This is your issue, not Nomad's (in this instance).

Like I told one of your dirty socks: I'm not reading your shit. Piss off, you sorry nazi trumptard fuck.
 
Nomad is a Trump troll. Tired of these assholes.

Thats just stupid to say,...and a damned lie. You know as well as I do that he is just more of an old school type of Democrat back from the days before both parties went further to the left and right. People like you are who are causing all this damned division and it needs to stop.
 
Like I told one of your dirty socks:
Of course, because whenever someone agrees with someone else about something, they both MUST be socks of each other. :rofl2:

Are Nomad and I socks now? :rofl2: :rofl2:

I'm not reading your shit.
I believe you. That's why you continue to say stupid shit, though. You don't read what other people say to you. You just mindlessly parrot the mainstream media narrative.

"Trump threatens bloodbath". "Trump threatens bloodbath". "Squawk squawk squawk".

:rofl2: :rofl2:

Piss off, you sorry nazi trumptard fuck.
Aweeeeee, pointing out Lurch's blind stupidity has made him angweeeeee.... aweeeeee

:rofl2:
 
Nope. Nomad has the correct take on this. It is YOU and the other leftist boot-lickers who are wrong about it.

Frank Apisa & other leftists in this thread: "must adopt leftist media talking points as my own view" "must adopt leftist media talking points as my own view" "must adopt leftist media talking points as my own view"

:rofl2:


:rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2:

What a crock of shit! Trump is very clearly referring to the US auto industry and the US economy in general. Obviously, you never even bothered to WATCH the video of him speaking, let alone comprehend it.


Lies.


Lies and projection.


"must adopt leftist media talking points as my own view" "must adopt leftist media talking points as my own view" "must adopt leftist media talking points as my own view"

:rofl2:

You are a sick pup, G. (Hope you do mind my calling you G. If you would prefer Mr. M, I will oblige you.)

Trump is scum...and so are his continued supporters.
 
If Trump wins in November, will you acknowledge [Biden's] loss and congratulate the winner?

Why not?

When Trump beat Hillary Clinton fair and square...I acknowledged it immediately. And I was a very enthusiastic Clinton supporter.

That is what Americans do...they acknowledge the winner of an election.

As far as congratulating a winner...I suggest only the person or persons against whom the winner ran actually has a need to congratulate.
 
Why not?

When Trump beat Hillary Clinton fair and square...I acknowledged it immediately. And I was a very enthusiastic Clinton supporter.

That is what Americans do...they acknowledge the winner of an election.

As far as congratulating a winner...I suggest only the person or persons against whom the winner ran actually has a need to congratulate.

what about bush/gore and hanging chads?
 
what about bush/gore and hanging chads?

What about 'em?

Florida's constitution allowed for a recount request when the difference between the candidates was under a certain percentage. Gore's mistake was asking for selective recounts instead of statewide, which SCOTUS overruled. The election was then decided, Gore publicly conceded, he met w/ the incoming President, and everyone moved on.
 
Why not?

When Trump beat Hillary Clinton fair and square...I acknowledged it immediately. And I was a very enthusiastic Clinton supporter.

That is what Americans do...they acknowledge the winner of an election.

As far as congratulating a winner...I suggest only the person or persons against whom the winner ran actually has a need to congratulate.

That’s a funny question coming from an election denier. I did the same. What’s simplistic about his question is the notion that I cannot accept an objective result if I subjectively ask questions about the process. For example I can acknowledge that Trump objectively won in 2016, but I can also question his apparent attempts to take advantage of foreign interference, I can question whether Comey acted appropriately and I do not have to congratulate anyone, especially human trash like Trump. They are not capable of that nuance.
 
What about 'em?

Florida's constitution allowed for a recount request when the difference between the candidates was under a certain percentage. Gore's mistake was asking for selective recounts instead of statewide, which SCOTUS overruled. The election was then decided, Gore publicly conceded, he met w/ the incoming President, and everyone moved on.

so why can't you move on from trump?
 
Thats just stupid to say,...and a damned lie. You know as well as I do that he is just more of an old school type of Democrat back from the days before both parties went further to the left and right. People like you are who are causing all this damned division and it needs to stop.

trump is actually not that far right. that's too simplistic.

he isn't for taking away all "entitlements" like romney republicans and neocons.
 
Back
Top