Hunter Biden told Devon Archer they would get 'last laugh' after conviction was throw

[archives]

Do you believe that Joe Biden has absolutely nothing to do with any of this? No knowledge... No participation whatsoever?

Ah, realistically, probably not, but until actually proven, nothing even close to the illegalities the House idiots are implying.

Not to import a whataboutism, but reversing the question, do you think Trump didn’t have anything to do or say in businesses his kids were involved in when he was President?

 

[archives]

There is more evidence coming out almost daily now and today will be the big turning point when Archer testifies.

Wrong again, Archer is a convicted felony, guilty of swindling people, and now his word is taken as proof of something? None of this, no one’s testimony, is supported by actual documentation, it is all he said she said, circumstantial at best

Interesting fact involved here is that Acher is testifying behind closed doors, no one will ever know what he said or what he was asked. A transcript may appear later, but according to House rules, only Comer can author that transcript, and he can decide to not to reveal the entire interview but only select sections. Happened two weeks ago when a FBI agent who worked on the case and nothing came for that interview

 

[Phantasmal]

There is more evidence coming out almost daily now and today will be the big turning point when Archer testifies.

Actually, Comer is withholding evidence from the Democrats, why would they do that?

https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-claim-gop-withholding-evidence-145946236.html

[FONT=&quot]“Rep. Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on House Oversight Committee, sent a letter Friday to Rep. James Comer, the Republican chair of the committee, asking him to produce the transcribed interview this month with an FBI agent who worked on the investigation into the younger Biden’s taxes and foreign business dealings. The witness was interviewed on July 17.[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]“This failure to release a transcript is the latest in your troubling pattern of concealing key evidence in order to advance a false and distorted narrative about your ‘investigation of Joe Biden’ that has not only failed to develop any evidence of wrongdoing by President Biden but has, in fact, uncovered substantial evidence to the contrary,” Raskin wrote in the letter, which was obtained by The Associated Press.”[/FONT]

 

[Tinkerpeach]

Actually, Comer is withholding evidence from the Democrats, why would they do that?

https://news.yahoo.com/democrats-claim-gop-withholding-evidence-145946236.html

[FONT="]“Rep. Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on House Oversight Committee, sent a letter Friday to Rep. James Comer, the Republican chair of the committee, asking him to produce the transcribed interview this month with an FBI agent who worked on the investigation into the younger Biden’s taxes and foreign business dealings. The witness was interviewed on July 17.[/FONT][/COLOR]
[COLOR=#232A31][FONT="]“This failure to release a transcript is the latest in your troubling pattern of concealing key evidence in order to advance a false and distorted narrative about your ‘investigation of Joe Biden’ that has not only failed to develop any evidence of wrongdoing by President Biden but has, in fact, uncovered substantial evidence to the contrary,” Raskin wrote in the letter, which was obtained by The Associated Press.”[/FONT]

You mean like the FBI not turning over forms?

 

[Phantasmal]

You mean like the FBI not turning over forms?

They stated their reasons for doing so, which seems to be lining up with the lack of evidence.

 

[archives]

You mean like the FBI not turning over forms?

Apples and Oranges, not even a good try

 

[Tinkerpeach]

Wrong again, Archer is a convicted felony, guilty of swindling people, and now his word is taken as proof of something? None of this, no one’s testimony, is supported by actual documentation, it is all he said she said, circumstantial at best

Interesting fact involved here is that Acher is testifying behind closed doors, no one will ever know what he said or what he was asked. A transcript may appear later, but according to House rules, only Comer can author that transcript, and he can decide to not to reveal the entire interview but only select sections. Happened two weeks ago when a FBI agent who worked on the case and nothing came for that interview

Archer is giving testimony as we speak that will provide congress with more avenues to pursue, that is the point of the questioning.

And prosecutions often use people convicted to turn on other people.

How do you think they get mafia bosses?

You will also notice how Biden has stopped saying he had no knowledge of Hunters business dealings and instead saying he wasn't in business with him.

Why would he change that at this point right before Archer's testimony?

 

[archives]

Archer is giving testimony as we speak that will provide congress with more avenues to pursue, that is the point of the questioning.

And prosecutions often use people convicted to turn on other people.

How do you think they get mafia bosses?

You will also notice how Biden has stopped saying he had no knowledge of Hunters business dealings and instead saying he wasn't in business with him.

Why would he change that at this point right before Archer's testimony?

Nothing personal, but wrong again, they are not “avenues to pursue,” without actual accompanying documentation, the word of convicted liars shouldn’t even be considered pursuing.

Comer is after anything he can use to frame an innuendo, all he needs is a phrase or a comment he can pedal as “proof,” which is why he will never release a full transcript of the interview. Maralago only wants innuendo, the more implicating the better, fro there the right wing media will echo it as fact, true or not, and Trump will shout it in his rallies. All scripted, beginning to end

 

[Tinkerpeach]

Nothing personal, but wrong again, they are not “avenues to pursue,” without actual accompanying documentation, the word of convicted liars shouldn’t even be considered pursuing.

Comer is after anything he can use to frame an innuendo, all he needs is a phrase or a comment he can pedal as “proof,” which is why he will never release a full transcript of the interview. Maralago only wants innuendo, the more implicating the better, fro there the right wing media will echo it as fact, true or not, and Trump will shout it in his rallies. All scripted, beginning to end

Yet you believe convicted people in the capital riots when they say Trump made them do it.

Kinda selective there don't you think?

 

[Nordberg]

Yeah I read this earlier.

It looks like Archer is now going to flip on the Biden's exposing Joe as a liar not to mention the criminal affairs aspect of it.

The democrats are crapping themselves right now.

I love it.

And the investigation has a lot further to go.

Today's testimony is going to change the whole nature of the investigation into an official inquiry of Joe Biden's bribery dealings.

How does it look like that? He is testifying today. That is what it looks like. The rest is unknown.

 

[Lionfish]

 

[Earl]

Archer is giving testimony as we speak that will provide congress with more avenues to pursue, that is the point of the questioning.

And prosecutions often use people convicted to turn on other people.

How do you think they get mafia bosses?

You will also notice how Biden has stopped saying he had no knowledge of Hunters business dealings and instead saying he wasn't in business with him.

Why would he change that at this point right before Archer's testimony?

Indeed.