Hunter Biden told Devon Archer they would get 'last laugh' after conviction was throw

No, they don’t, the burden of proof is always on the accusers. The Republican’s must prove they have a case, at this point, the evidence doesn’t support their case.

The burden of proof is a legal standard that requires parties to provide evidence to demonstrate that a claim is valid. Three levels of the burden of proof, "beyond a reasonable doubt," a "preponderance of the evidence," and "clear and convincing" determine the level of evidence required for a claim. Colorado Law.

IDqCvjx q Ge7pIkMGgvh7QkqfQtsRfUMIFV2qW4ZMNrUP9tB1CeYg1FwBi ltNQ0unJwAAAABJRU5ErkJggg==

https://www.investopedia.com › terms

[h=3]Burden of Proof: Meaning, Standards and Examples - Investopedia[/h]





Yes, they do... I'm surprised that you're missing all the evidence that's been presented... well actually I'm not surprised... but feel free to give me an example of where the evidence presented does not support the case... it's very clear it's very convincing it's beyond A Reasonable Doubt and a preponderance of the evidence... feel free to show me how Joe was never involved though... I gave you examples of what the bidens are going to have to somehow prove is evidence that doesn't exist... it's right there in black and white... how are they going to do that? Is Hunter going to accept full responsibility and say that he was just joshing around and that his dad knew nothing about this?
 
Why did the plea deal fall apart? That was their get out of jail free ticket... this 10-day vacation in Delaware was supposed to be a celebration...
 
Yes, they do... I'm surprised that you're missing all the evidence that's been presented... well actually I'm not surprised... but feel free to give me an example of where the evidence presented does not support the case... it's very clear it's very convincing it's beyond A Reasonable Doubt and a preponderance of the evidence... feel free to show me how Joe was never involved though... I gave you examples of what the bidens are going to have to somehow prove is evidence that doesn't exist... it's right there in black and white... how are they going to do that? Is Hunter going to accept full responsibility and say that he was just joshing around and that his dad knew nothing about this?

Present the evidence you say is so damning TOP, thanks
 
Yes, they do... I'm surprised that you're missing all the evidence that's been presented... well actually I'm not surprised... but feel free to give me an example of where the evidence presented does not support the case... it's very clear it's very convincing it's beyond A Reasonable Doubt and a preponderance of the evidence... feel free to show me how Joe was never involved though... I gave you examples of what the bidens are going to have to somehow prove is evidence that doesn't exist... it's right there in black and white... how are they going to do that? Is Hunter going to accept full responsibility and say that he was just joshing around and that his dad knew nothing about this?

Archer is the key…we will probably know by tomorrow if he flipped on Hunter and Joe.
 
Yes, they do... I'm surprised that you're missing all the evidence that's been presented... well actually I'm not surprised... but feel free to give me an example of where the evidence presented does not support the case... it's very clear it's very convincing it's beyond A Reasonable Doubt and a preponderance of the evidence... feel free to show me how Joe was never involved though... I gave you examples of what the bidens are going to have to somehow prove is evidence that doesn't exist... it's right there in black and white... how are they going to do that? Is Hunter going to accept full responsibility and say that he was just joshing around and that his dad knew nothing about this?
Has Joe been under oath? Legally, Joe can make any claims he wishes about the situation, until he’s under oath, that’s when it matters.

The “so called “evidence” was available to Barr’s DOJ and they didn’t investigate it.

The witness they have, put him under oath, if he has receipts, that may be a problem, but we will have to wait for the testimonies under oath.
 
Has Joe been under oath? Legally, Joe can make any claims he wishes about the situation, until he’s under oath, that’s when it matters.

The “so called “evidence” was available to Barr’s DOJ and they didn’t investigate it.

The witness they have, put him under oath, if he has receipts, that may be a problem, but we will have to wait for the testimonies under oath.

Has Joe been telling the truth? Why should it matter if he's under oath or not? What reason should he have for lying? (And binder girl made it clear he's been lying about never talking to Hunter about business...) Do you think that the emails that are available in the bank account information is all fake? Just to mention a few pieces of evidence...
 
Has Joe been under oath? Legally, Joe can make any claims he wishes about the situation, until he’s under oath, that’s when it matters.

The “so called “evidence” was available to Barr’s DOJ and they didn’t investigate it.

The witness they have, put him under oath, if he has receipts, that may be a problem, but we will have to wait for the testimonies under oath.

So, Joe only tells the truth when he is under oath.

Good to see you know that.
 
Has Joe been telling the truth? Why should it matter if he's under oath or not? What reason should he have for lying? (And binder girl made it clear he's been lying about never talking to Hunter about business...) Do you think that the emails that are available in the bank account information is all fake? Just to mention a few pieces of evidence...
What are the emails, are they available for viewing?

Why didn’t Barr try to bring this case if it is so damning? Everyone seems to avoid this, especially Comer, Grassley and Jordan and all the others who think this is criminal behavior? Impeachable offenses.

Put the witness on the stand and let Jamie Raskin question him, I’m all for getting the truth.
 
No, they don’t, the burden of proof is always on the accusers. The Republican’s must prove they have a case, at this point, the evidence doesn’t support their case.

The burden of proof is a legal standard that requires parties to provide evidence to demonstrate that a claim is valid. Three levels of the burden of proof, "beyond a reasonable doubt," a "preponderance of the evidence," and "clear and convincing" determine the level of evidence required for a claim. Colorado Law.

IDqCvjx q Ge7pIkMGgvh7QkqfQtsRfUMIFV2qW4ZMNrUP9tB1CeYg1FwBi ltNQ0unJwAAAABJRU5ErkJggg==

https://www.investopedia.com › terms

[h=3]Burden of Proof: Meaning, Standards and Examples - Investopedia[/h]




So Trump is an innocent man in your opinion? You have never said he is guilty of anything? Yeah right.
 
What are the emails, are they available for viewing?

Why didn’t Barr try to bring this case if it is so damning? Everyone seems to avoid this, especially Comer, Grassley and Jordan and all the others who think this is criminal behavior? Impeachable offenses.

Put the witness on the stand and let Jamie Raskin question him, I’m all for getting the truth.

My father is sitting right next to me......
 
Has Joe been under oath? Legally, Joe can make any claims he wishes about the situation, until he’s under oath, that’s when it matters.

The “so called “evidence” was available to Barr’s DOJ and they didn’t investigate it.

The witness they have, put him under oath, if he has receipts, that may be a problem, but we will have to wait for the testimonies under oath.
You want Santos run out of office for lying to the American public but you want to give Joe Biden a pass for lying to the public. Interesting. :thinking:
 
That’s classic Freedom idiots, they are making a convicted felon, a guy guilty of swindling others, the center of their case, and taking what he says with zero proof as fact.

Typical, truth means nothing, they aren’t after facts, rather taking their orders from MaraLago, they’re out to generate the innuendos that their media can echo as facts and the lemmings swallow.

All a charade to deflect off of their Messiah’s actual legal problems, taking the 2016 playbook, their goal is to portray President Biden as crooked and corrupt as Trump regardless of the truth
 
Hunter Biden told Devon Archer they would get 'last laugh' after conviction was thrown out: 'Motherf---ers' Biden praises Archer in emails, calls him 'great friend through thick and thin' in 2014 email By Cameron Cawthorne | Fox News Devon Archer 'definitively' placing Joe Biden in story will change everything: Penn TownHall.com editor Katie Pavlich and former Clinton adviser Mark Penn discuss the impact of Hunter Biden's legal woes on his father going into the 2024 race on "The Story." Hunter Biden told his longtime friend and business partner, Devon Archer, that they would get the "last laugh" after Archer said a judge threw out his conviction, according to 2018 text messages reviewed by Fox News Digital. Archer, who is set to appear before the House Oversight Committee on Monday and is reportedly preparing to tell lawmakers about President Biden's interactions with dozens of Hunter's business associates while he was vice president, informed Hunter Biden in a November 2018 text message that the "judge threw out my conviction today." "Thank f---ing god! First good news in way too long my friend. I am so happy for you. I know its (sic) been a living hell but put it behind you now and take great steps forward," Hunter replied. "Love you brother," Archer said. DEVON ARCHER, THE MAN WHO WILL TESTIFY TO CONGRESS ABOUT HIS BUSINESS DEALINGS WITH HUNTER BIDEN: WHO IS HE? Hunter, son of President Biden, then appeared to refer to the Department of Justice as "motherf---ers" and said he and Archer will "have the last laugh." "I swear to god we’ll have the last laugh," Hunter said. "I know. And I mean it. Can I please come see you now that I'm not a felon!?!" Archer said. "Don't answer that. Just when and where?" Hunter joked that he liked Archer "better as a felon" and that he was in Newburyport, Massachusetts, for the next week but to call him. U.S. District Judge Ronnie Abrams in Manhattan ruled on that day that evidence that was presented earlier that year against Archer did not show that he "knew that the bond issue was fraudulent, or that he received any personal benefit from it," according to Reuters. Abrams added that she was "left with an unwavering concern that Archer is innocent of the crimes charged." HUNTER'S

BUSINESS PARTNER DEVON ARCHER IN 'HIDING' AHEAD OF BOMBSHELL TESTIMONY: REPORT Hunter Biden and Devon Archer exchanged messages after Archer's conviction was thrown out in November 2018. (Marco Polo) The 2018 text exchange and thousands of emails exchanged between Hunter Biden, Archer and dozens of business associates over the course of a decade will be front and center as Archer goes before the House Oversight Committee to testify behind closed-doors on his business dealings with Hunter, and reportedly about explosive allegations about the elder Biden joining his son on business calls and meeting with his business associates. "Devon Archer believes strongly in the rule of law and the democratic system, and is prepared to answer the Committee's questions just as he has already answered similar questions from a federal grand jury, the Department of Justice, and several other government agencies in their investigations concerning the Biden family," Archer's attorney, Matthew Schwartz, said this past week in a statement. Archer and the Bidens Devon Archer is shown while golfing with Joe Biden and Hunter Biden in 2014. (Fox News)

BIDEN’S NARRATIVE ON NEVER DISCUSSING BUSINESS DEALS WITH HUNTER CONTINUES TO CRUMBLE Archer’s intimate knowledge of the business arrangements comes after years of working closely with Hunter, including on the board of Ukrainian natural gas firm Burisma Holdings with him, beginning in 2014. He also co-founded investment firm Rosemont Seneca Partners alongside the president’s son and U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry’s stepson, Christopher Heinz. Archer served as managing director. Archer co-founded BHR Partners in 2013 – a joint-venture between Rosemont Seneca Partners and Chinese investment firm Bohai Capital. BHR Partners is a Beijing-backed private equity firm controlled by Bank of China Limited. Months after Hunter and Archer joined the Burisma board, Hunter expressed gratitude for Archer's friendship in an unprompted email. "Just wanted to let you know- at the risk of sounding melodramatic- how much I love you. You have been a great friend through thick and thin, and I wanted to make sure you know how much I appreciate it," Hunter said to Archer. "I know I haven't made it easy being my partner at times, but more than anyone outside my brother you have been there for me. And don't worry I'm not planning on jumping off [a] bridge or anything- just thought I should let you know how much your friendship means to me. Love, H." Hunter Biden email with Devon Archer Hunter Biden praised Devon Archer in a November 2014 email for always being there for him and said he wanted him to "know how much your friendship means to me." (Fox News) "Thank you my brother! I genuinely appreciate that and I'm really excited about what's ahead for us and our families and very happy to being doing it with you," Archer replied. In April, Fox News Digital reported that at least four business partners, a vice president and two assistants at Rosemont Seneca Partners visited the White House more than 80 times when Biden was vice president, including Archer.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hu...archer-last-laugh-after-conviction-thrown-out

Here say and circumstantial, kinda humorous how the right is now making a convicted felon, a guy found guilty of swindling others, as the center of their Hunter campaign. First it was big Bobby Bolinski, and then disgruntled ex employees, and now a convicted felon, enough said

What the lemmings don’t get, and the Trump stooges will never tell them, is that everyone knows Hunter is a bum, but last I knew having a kid who is a bun doesn’t automatically mean the parent is a bum
 
There lack of willingness on this board to defend Biden is a good sign.

The lefties here know that Biden is in trouble.

No, not at all, what few are defending Hunter, everyone knows he is a bum, and the right has yet to prove anything on President Biden that has to be defended
 
No, not at all, what few are defending Hunter, everyone knows he is a bum, and the right has yet to prove anything on President Biden that has to be defended
Do you believe that Joe Biden has absolutely nothing to do with any of this? No knowledge... No participation whatsoever?
 
No, not at all, what few are defending Hunter, everyone knows he is a bum, and the right has yet to prove anything on President Biden that has to be defended

There is more evidence coming out almost daily now and today will be the big turning point when Archer testifies.
 
There is more evidence coming out almost daily now and today will be the big turning point when Archer testifies.

I think that it's fascinating that anyone believes Joe is innocent of any involvement in this...
 
Back
Top