How many people did Democrats murder by knowingly lying about Hydroxochloroquine?

Arminius said:


For the same reason I gave you the last eight times you asked, illiterate moron. Learn how to read. :laugh:
Click to expand...

You never gave a reason.

Not once.

You said you gave a reason, but I went back through the thread and saw no reason.

You just started saying you gave a reason so you don't have to give a reason.

Everyone can see right through what you're doing.
 
LV426 said:
The problem is that it ties into your argument here because if you're being disingenuous about the 2020 election, then there is no reason to believe you on HCQ.

I don't make those rules.
Click to expand...

That's an ad hominem fallacy. And yes, you DO make that shitty logic (or 'rule'). By this garbage argument, you could be talking about frivolous lawsuits and the Moon landing would be relevant to that discussion because I decided you not going to the Moon when you said you liked astronomy makes you a phony.

You're literally arguing on a straight retard level right now. :rofl2:
 
LV426 said:
I think so little of your will and sincerity that I feel confident I could convince you into buying a time share.

After all, if you believe any horseshit about HCQ, you'd definitely be enough of a sucker to buy a time share.
Click to expand...

Which is why you post five posts every thirty seconds all addressed to me...because you care so little about what I have to say.

See how it becomes obvious that YOU'RE the phony here? :awesome:
 
LV426 said:
Explain that fallacy, then.

Please, proceed governor.

You've repeated this five times and I don't even know what it means.

I think you're just posting random words in the hopes I'll get tired and abandon the question around your sincerity.

As it stands, you're just a faker.
Click to expand...

I refer you to the literally first twenty fucking times I already did that. :dunno:

Not endlessly going in circles with you over an utterly retarded fucking fallacy that I've already debunked over and over, and over again.
 
Arminius said:
hat's an ad hominem fallacy.
Click to expand...

What's the ad hominem:

The problem is that it ties into your argument here because if you're being disingenuous about the 2020 election, then there is no reason to believe you on HCQ.
Click to expand...

Point it out. Show me the ad hominem in that.

You're the one who won't answer for your actions on 1/6, nor are you the one who will answer for why OK is still sitting on $2M worth of HCQ it bought over a year ago?
 
LV426 said:
You never gave a reason.

Not once.

You said you gave a reason, but I went back through the thread and saw no reason.

You just started saying you gave a reason so you don't have to give a reason.

Everyone can see right through what you're doing.
Click to expand...

Again with simply pretending away what is right there in the record for all to see. First you blindly denied the links I posted, over and over and over, and now you deny the answers I've posted, over, and over, and over. You are literally too retarded for adult conversation.
 
Arminius said:
And yes, you DO make that shitty logic (or 'rule'). By this garbage argument, you could be talking about frivolous lawsuits and the Moon landing would be relevant to that discussion because I decided you not going to the Moon when you said you liked astronomy makes you a phony.
Click to expand...

If you simply just admitted that you were trying to pump up the election lies because you get off on the chaos, that would be way easier to believe than you saying the election was stolen.
 
Arminius said:
By this garbage argument, you could be talking about frivolous lawsuits and the Moon landing would be relevant to that discussion because I decided you not going to the Moon when you said you liked astronomy makes you a phony.
Click to expand...

But I'm talking about the 2020 election, that you said was stolen, but apparently not stolen enough for you to do anything about it other than rile other people up to do the actions you're too chickenshit to do yourself.

And if you're not chickenshit, then you're a phony.
 
LV426 said:
What's the ad hominem:



Point it out. Show me the ad hominem in that.

You're the one who won't answer for your actions on 1/6, nor are you the one who will answer for why OK is still sitting on $2M worth of HCQ it bought over a year ago?
Click to expand...

You didn't go to some event. Therefore I've decided that you can't oppose election theft.

This utterly retarded fallacy of yours...is an ad hominem fallacy, because it is attempting to shift the debate to attacking the debater instead of the argument they're making. Pretty much 100% of your "arguments" are this fallacy.
 
LV426 said:
If you simply just admitted that you were trying to pump up the election lies because you get off on the chaos, that would be way easier to believe than you saying the election was stolen.
Click to expand...

Nothing I said indicates anything like that, crack-smoker. :laugh:
 
Arminius said:
Which is why you post five posts every thirty seconds all addressed to me...because you care so little about what I have to say.
Click to expand...

Well, it's better than stringing together a long, rambling, incoherent post that ultimately says nothing...like what you do.

And you posted five responses, seconds apart, to me! LOL.

Why is it that whenever you accuse someone of doing something, it's something you've already done yourself?
 
LV426 said:
But I'm talking about the 2020 election, that you said was stolen, but apparently not stolen enough for you to do anything about it other than rile other people up to do the actions you're too chickenshit to do yourself.

And if you're not chickenshit, then you're a phony.
Click to expand...

ad hominem "only terrorists can oppose election theft" fallacy...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top