How many people did Democrats murder by knowingly lying about Hydroxochloroquine?

[Geeko Sportivo]

The links I posted were from CNN and NY Times there, genius.

There are a lot of left-wing outlets in on this right-wing conspiracy.

WHy you lying bastard. YOU TOOK THE CNN AND NYT REPORTS OUT OF CONTEXT!

THERE IS NO UPDATE ON hydroxychloroquine THAT HAS CHANGED. And if you had of posted the OPed in it's entirety, instead of just one sentence from the oped that plays into your narrative, you would have understood that the OPed was not about giving hydroxychloroquine a go.

What CNN and the NYT were trying to point out was these small studies are not acceptable and were not truthful- YOU FUCKING NUMBNUTSCOMPOOT!

NICE TRY MORON! BUT YOU FAIL!

THIS IS MISINFORMATION AND TAKING WHAT THE MEDIA SAYS AND MANIPULATING IT FOR PROPAGANDA and RHETORIC- FAKE NEWS!

NOW HERE IS THE TRUTH.......................ONCE AND FOR FUCKING ALL!

This report is dated Thursday, March 25, 2021

https://www.cochrane.org/news/chlor...ating-people-covid-19-or-preventing-infection

 

[LV426]

If it was stolen how come you didn't do anything about it.

Because I don't believe it was stolen.

But you do.

But not enough for you to do anything about it, choosing instead to goad people into taking the action you're too scared to take.

 

[artichoke]

No it wasn't.

You all do this all the time, you say something stupid and then when asked to clarify, you refuse.

Translation: You fail to comprehend what you read, ask the same question over and over, and over again, until people get sick of going in circles with your reading comprehension issues, and then you falsely accuse them of avoiding the subject.



Pathological LV426 Lunacy #2

Trying to blatantly pretend away already established facts. This is invalid and childish.

I can't help it that you can't keep track of what you say from post to post, nor can I help it that you egg people on to do the things you're too scared to do yourself.

Wow.

Pathological LV426 Lunacy #2

Trying to blatantly pretend away already established facts. This is invalid and childish.

Nope. This is a lie.

All you've done 20 times is repeat the same single sentence.

That's all you've done on this thread, and the reason why is because you know you're full of shit.

Pathological LV426 Lunacy #2

Trying to blatantly pretend away already established facts. This is invalid and childish.

Which is why you haven't linked to it, copied it, or pasted it.

Because it doesn't exist and you're lying about it.

Just like how you lied about HCQ working.

Just like how you lied about the election being stolen.

Your goal is to goad someone into taking the action you are too chickenshit to take yourself.

Pathological LV426 Lunacy #2

Trying to blatantly pretend away already established facts. This is invalid and childish.

No you didn't, and now you're lying about this because you've already dug yourself into a hole.

Pathological LV426 Lunacy #2

Trying to blatantly pretend away already established facts. This is invalid and childish.

You said for months that the election was stolen, and that's significant...that's a direct threat to the Republic.

So explain why your actions didn't and don't rise to the level of the threat you were trying to posture?

Pathological LV426 Lunacy #1

Problems with the moronic fallacy you are relentlessly spamming this site with about how only domestic terrorists can object to election theft:

-It is invalid logic. It is an ad hominem fallacy (trying to shift the debate to attacking the debater personally instead of attacking their argument) as well as a non-sequiter fallacy (the logic simply does not follow).

-You don't get to arbitrarily invent rules about how people are allowed to respond to a given problem and then psychotically harass them about it for 50 pages straight on a thread that has nothing to do with your absurd fallacy in the first place. Different people can have different solutions to the same problem. Not that it is any of your business how anyone chooses to respond to election theft.

-But even playing along with the obviously stupid and invalid "logic" that if you didn't attack the Capitol Building, then you cannot possibly disagree with the election being stolen, what about poor people, people who live far away, injured people, sick people, people who just had a death in the family, people who had jury duty or who were in jail? Can THEY not have attacked the Capitol Building and still have some random online idiot's permission to disagree?

-It is an idiotic attempt to taunt, goad, and troll anyone who disagrees with election theft. No one is ever going to think this ridiculous line of reasoning is compelling. It is completely ineffective and makes you look childish, obnoxious, and dense.

-By this garbage logic, every Democrat is a coward for peddling the most hysterical conspiracy theories about President Trump being a secret Russian agent and them not responding by invading the White House. Even addressing something so clearly ludicrous seems beneath anything to which any member of this site should ever be expected to subject themselves.

That's not ad hominem.

Yes, attacking the debater instead of their argument, which is exactly what your entire "counterpoint" here is centered on, is an ad hominem fallacy, even if you resort to blind denial about this as well.

Everything you've said indicates that!

Pathological LV426 Lunacy #2

Trying to blatantly pretend away already established facts. This is invalid and childish.

The three months of lies about the election being stolen, with no resulting action from you to do anything about it, indicates that you don't really believe the election was stolen.

After all, a stolen election would be a first for America, and a pretty fucking big deal.

And also, if the election was stolen by Biden, then it was also stolen by McConnell, Graham, Collins, and Tillis, so their election results need to be invalidated and they need to be removed from power, since everyone was on the same ballot.

1) Pathological LV426 Lunacy #1

Problems with the moronic fallacy you are relentlessly spamming this site with about how only domestic terrorists can object to election theft:

-It is invalid logic. It is an ad hominem fallacy (trying to shift the debate to attacking the debater personally instead of attacking their argument) as well as a non-sequiter fallacy (the logic simply does not follow).

-You don't get to arbitrarily invent rules about how people are allowed to respond to a given problem and then psychotically harass them about it for 50 pages straight on a thread that has nothing to do with your absurd fallacy in the first place. Different people can have different solutions to the same problem. Not that it is any of your business how anyone chooses to respond to election theft.

-But even playing along with the obviously stupid and invalid "logic" that if you didn't attack the Capitol Building, then you cannot possibly disagree with the election being stolen, what about poor people, people who live far away, injured people, sick people, people who just had a death in the family, people who had jury duty or who were in jail? Can THEY not have attacked the Capitol Building and still have some random online idiot's permission to disagree?

-It is an idiotic attempt to taunt, goad, and troll anyone who disagrees with election theft. No one is ever going to think this ridiculous line of reasoning is compelling. It is completely ineffective and makes you look childish, obnoxious, and dense.

-By this garbage logic, every Democrat is a coward for peddling the most hysterical conspiracy theories about President Trump being a secret Russian agent and them not responding by invading the White House. Even addressing something so clearly ludicrous seems beneath anything to which any member of this site should ever be expected to subject themselves.

2) When the outcome is literally mathematically impossible, that IS the proof that something else happened. Things that are proven, are not lies, genius.

3) The only way one Democrats can cheat is if Republicans helped them steal the election...from Republicans? Seriously. That's what you're going with?

This blatantly stupid falsehood stands on its own two feet as a glaring testament to your garbage logic.

Hint: You don't just get to pretend away facts and proof with mindless, baseless deflection and "make up whatever I feel like" story hour.

That's not a fallacy.

You avoiding your actions that day is the fallacy.

You want us to pretend you believe the election was stolen so long as it's convenient for you.

Pathological LV426 Lunacy #1

Problems with the moronic fallacy you are relentlessly spamming this site with about how only domestic terrorists can object to election theft:

-It is invalid logic. It is an ad hominem fallacy (trying to shift the debate to attacking the debater personally instead of attacking their argument) as well as a non-sequiter fallacy (the logic simply does not follow).

-You don't get to arbitrarily invent rules about how people are allowed to respond to a given problem and then psychotically harass them about it for 50 pages straight on a thread that has nothing to do with your absurd fallacy in the first place. Different people can have different solutions to the same problem. Not that it is any of your business how anyone chooses to respond to election theft.

-But even playing along with the obviously stupid and invalid "logic" that if you didn't attack the Capitol Building, then you cannot possibly disagree with the election being stolen, what about poor people, people who live far away, injured people, sick people, people who just had a death in the family, people who had jury duty or who were in jail? Can THEY not have attacked the Capitol Building and still have some random online idiot's permission to disagree?

-It is an idiotic attempt to taunt, goad, and troll anyone who disagrees with election theft. No one is ever going to think this ridiculous line of reasoning is compelling. It is completely ineffective and makes you look childish, obnoxious, and dense.

-By this garbage logic, every Democrat is a coward for peddling the most hysterical conspiracy theories about President Trump being a secret Russian agent and them not responding by invading the White House. Even addressing something so clearly ludicrous seems beneath anything to which any member of this site should ever be expected to subject themselves.

You still can't account for why there is $2M worth of HCQ that has been sitting in Oklahoma for over a year.

Asked and answered a hundred times now.

Trying to deny what was already answered. This is invalid and childish.

Pathological LV426 Lunacy #4

I've come up with two things, and you've avoided both:

1. If HCQ is a miracle, how come OK has been sitting on $2M worth of it for over a year?

2. If the election was truly stolen, how come you didn't do anything about it?

You avoided both of those questions, then lied about answering them.

You're just not an honest person.

Asked and answered a hundred times now.

Trying to deny what was already answered. This is invalid and childish.

Pathological LV426 Lunacy #4

This run-on sentence is incoherent babble.

You're a dummy because you think you're clever enough to pull a con on HCQ and your absence from anything meaningful on 1/6.

You're not as clever as you think you are.

Pathological LV426 Lunacy #1 and #4.

---

For the record, since this has been lied about like a hundred times now by someone who seems to think they can just overwhelm people with a thousand spam posts per minute all repeating the same already addressed falsehoods, endlessly accusing them of not responding no matter how many times they respond...

Here is the answer I have given a hundred fucking times that this illiterate liar continuously spams the living shit out of this page with false accusations of going unaddressed:

-No one used the hydroxychloroquine supplies in Oklahoma, obviously, because Democrats lied about it and convinced everyone it was poison knowing full well that it was the cure...hence the entire point of the thread, dumb-ass.

(This is your cue to change the subject with 50 more posts and then start accusing me of never having addressed this again)

-The evidence that CNN and the NY Times now admit they lied this entire time and mass murdered thousands of people.

CNN: "Their study of 2,541 hospitalized patients found that those given hydroxychloroquine were much less likely to die."



(This is your cue to change the subject with 50 more posts and then start accusing me of never having addressed this again)

-The evidence that we knew this the entire time and were screaming it from the rooftops while we were being crucified by the book-burning anti-science Democrat cult for deviating from the herd:

A New Study Shows, Again, That Hydroxychloroquine Works

Study finds hydroxychloroquine helped coronavirus patients survive better

Thousands of Doctors: Yes, Hydroxychloroquine Works Against Wuhan Coronavirus

Yale epidemiologist says hydroxychloroquine could save up to 100K lives if used for coronavirus

"Thousands of doctors admit Hydroxychloroquine works quickly and effectively against COVID, and that they would prescribe it for their own family members, yet Democrats repeatedly lied about it, attacked President Trump for pointing out how promising it was early on (before being forced to admit he was right), tried to smear him (the President who refuses his own salary) as trying to personally profit from it, and even falsely blamed him when random people absurdly tried ingesting non-medicinal Hydroxychloroquine with fatal results. Their intentional lies about this treatment cost thousands of people their lives."​

(This is your cue to change the subject with 50 more posts and then start accusing me of never having addressed this again)

Like I said, your failure to comprehend what you read a hundred times in a row is not other people failing to address your moronic fallacies. Time for your next 50-page lying spree.

 

[artichoke]

WHy you lying bastard. YOU TOOK THE CNN AND NYT REPORTS OUT OF CONTEXT!

Is that what I did? Please, by all means, show us what "context" can undo this quote from CNN:

"Their study of 2,541 hospitalized patients found that those given hydroxychloroquine were much less likely to die."

THERE IS NO UPDATE ON hydroxychloroquine THAT HAS CHANGED. And if you had of posted the OPed in it's entirety, instead of just one sentence from the oped that plays into your narrative, you would have understood that the OPed was not about giving hydroxychloroquine a go.

No one CARES about the other 99% of the article with CNN rushing in to spin and lie about the devastating fact revealed in this statement (that the drug works, and has this entire time). Intelligent people go out of their way to filter out the noise, spin, and CNN propaganda and just look for what's there. YOU, on the other hand, pay attention only to their attempts to spin this devastating revelation as something other than what it is and then hysterically accuse others of lying for looking only at the true part.

Hint: You have to be capable of independent thought to read articles critically like this. The fact that you're hyperventilating over me not buying their irrelevant spin that attempts to portray the findings as the exact opposite of what they obviously mean...removes all doubt that you are one of the cattle that thinks what you're TOLD to think.



You being stupid doesn't make me a liar.

Try again.

 

[artichoke]

Because I don't believe it was stolen.

But you do.

But not enough for you to do anything about it, choosing instead to goad people into taking the action you're too scared to take.

Pathological LV426 Lunacy #1

Problems with the moronic fallacy you are relentlessly spamming this site with about how only domestic terrorists can object to election theft:

-It is invalid logic. It is an ad hominem fallacy (trying to shift the debate to attacking the debater personally instead of attacking their argument) as well as a non-sequiter fallacy (the logic simply does not follow).

-You don't get to arbitrarily invent rules about how people are allowed to respond to a given problem and then psychotically harass them about it for 50 pages straight on a thread that has nothing to do with your absurd fallacy in the first place. Different people can have different solutions to the same problem. Not that it is any of your business how anyone chooses to respond to election theft.

-But even playing along with the obviously stupid and invalid "logic" that if you didn't attack the Capitol Building, then you cannot possibly disagree with the election being stolen, what about poor people, people who live far away, injured people, sick people, people who just had a death in the family, people who had jury duty or who were in jail? Can THEY not have attacked the Capitol Building and still have some random online idiot's permission to disagree?

-It is an idiotic attempt to taunt, goad, and troll anyone who disagrees with election theft. No one is ever going to think this ridiculous line of reasoning is compelling. It is completely ineffective and makes you look childish, obnoxious, and dense.

-By this garbage logic, every Democrat is a coward for peddling the most hysterical conspiracy theories about President Trump being a secret Russian agent and them not responding by invading the White House. Even addressing something so clearly ludicrous seems beneath anything to which any member of this site should ever be expected to subject themselves.

 

[LV426]

Pathological LV426 Lunacy #1

Problems with the moronic fallacy you are relentlessly spamming this site with about how only domestic terrorists can object to election theft:

-It is invalid logic. It is an ad hominem fallacy (trying to shift the debate to attacking the debater personally instead of attacking their argument) as well as a non-sequiter fallacy (the logic simply does not follow).

-You don't get to arbitrarily invent rules about how people are allowed to respond to a given problem and then psychotically harass them about it for 50 pages straight on a thread that has nothing to do with your absurd fallacy in the first place. Different people can have different solutions to the same problem. Not that it is any of your business how anyone chooses to respond to election theft.

-But even playing along with the obviously stupid and invalid "logic" that if you didn't attack the Capitol Building, then you cannot possibly disagree with the election being stolen, what about poor people, people who live far away, injured people, sick people, people who just had a death in the family, people who had jury duty or who were in jail? Can THEY not have attacked the Capitol Building and still have some random online idiot's permission to disagree?

-It is an idiotic attempt to taunt, goad, and troll anyone who disagrees with election theft. No one is ever going to think this ridiculous line of reasoning is compelling. It is completely ineffective and makes you look childish, obnoxious, and dense.

-By this garbage logic, every Democrat is a coward for peddling the most hysterical conspiracy theories about President Trump being a secret Russian agent and them not responding by invading the White House. Even addressing something so clearly ludicrous seems beneath anything to which any member of this site should ever be expected to subject themselves.

You need a time out.

 

[LV426]

No one used the hydroxychloroquine supplies in Oklahoma, obviously, because Democrats lied about it and convinced everyone it was poison knowing full well that it was the cure...hence the entire point of the thread, dumb-ass.

So you're saying you and Trump convinced them to buy those doses, but then Democrats (who have no power in Oklahoma) convinced Oklahoma to not use any of the doses they just bought?

So why would they listen to Trump, but then not listen to Trump?

 

[LV426]

-It is invalid logic. It is an ad hominem fallacy (trying to shift the debate to attacking the debater personally instead of attacking their argument)

Not what ad hominem is, you stupid bastard (<-THAT is ad hominem).

And your lack of action on 1/6 is wholly relevant to this debate because it speaks to your sincerity.

You say you sincerely believe the election was stolen, but you didn't do anything about it even though the magnitude of what you're alleging requires personal action on your part.

So you ran your big mouth, trying to convince other people to do the things you're too chickenshit to do yourself.

 

[Bulletbob]

Now that it's no longer necessary for Democrats to keep us from instantly and effortlessly brushing off COVID with an already known 50-year cure, they have finally stopped intentionally lying about it and started admitting that it likely worked all along...but they weren't willing to take the chance of that turning out to be true until now, so they just lied through their teeth non-stop about it being proven ineffective or even harmful.

But now that Resident Biden has been installed in place of the election winner, there's no longer any reason to prevent this nothing virus from being tossed aside, so they admit the truth...

CNN: "Their study of 2,541 hospitalized patients found that those given hydroxychloroquine were much less likely to die."

View attachment 20107

---

For the record, this is not new. We've known all along that it works on COVID. Democrats just lied about it incessantly until everyone was afraid to take it:

A New Study Shows, Again, That Hydroxychloroquine Works

Study finds hydroxychloroquine helped coronavirus patients survive better

Thousands of Doctors: Yes, Hydroxychloroquine Works Against Wuhan Coronavirus

Yale epidemiologist says hydroxychloroquine could save up to 100K lives if used for coronavirus

Also for the record, this was posted early on in this crisis, when Democrats first started murdering people with this deliberate lie that kept them from taking medicine they needed:

"Thousands of doctors admit Hydroxychloroquine works quickly and effectively against COVID, and that they would prescribe it for their own family members, yet Democrats repeatedly lied about it, attacked President Trump for pointing out how promising it was early on (before being forced to admit he was right), tried to smear him (the President who refuses his own salary) as trying to personally profit from it, and even falsely blamed him when random people absurdly tried ingesting non-medicinal Hydroxychloroquine with fatal results. Their intentional lies about this treatment cost thousands of people their lives."​

---

Democrats knew they were lying. They just didn't care. They knowingly killed people to score partisan points. So my question is, how many American citizens needlessly had to die for Democrats to carry out this deranged nutjob vendetta against a president they simply couldn't handle being beaten by (again)? Do we even have a way of calculating how many innocent people died THIS TIME so Democrats could rig things for themselves?

They already routinely volunteer Americans up to be raped, robbed, and murdered by illegal immigrants and un-vetted terror state "refugees" (put in OUR back yards, not theirs) at every turn so they can import a foreign electorate to work around the American people. They routinely sacrifice our lives so they can kneel in submission to their brownshirt lynch mobs (BLM, Antifa) as we get escalating waves of robberies, beatings, extortion, arson, and murder, and as we get thrown in prison for self-defense and cops get falsely persecuted for enforcing the law. They destroyed our children's education to keep President Trump's record-breaking economy crippled during a 99% survival rate virus outbreak.

Apparently literally nothing is more important than Democrat power. Screw our rights, our lives, our children's future, our country, and everything else we hold dear.

Democrats have elections to rig and steal.

by using it your chances of survival was 200 percent better

 

[Concart]

Trumptards claim Hydroxychloroquine is the cure for the disease that Trumptards claim is imaginary.

How fucking stupid can you get?

 

[Concart]

by using it your chances of survival was 200 percent better

Take a math class you fucking moron.

 

[Concart]

Is that what I did? Please, by all means, show us what "context" can undo this quote from CNN:

"Their study of 2,541 hospitalized patients found that those given hydroxychloroquine were much less likely to die."





No one CARES about the other 99% of the article with CNN rushing in to spin and lie about the devastating fact revealed in this statement (that the drug works, and has this entire time). Intelligent people go out of their way to filter out the noise, spin, and CNN propaganda and just look for what's there. YOU, on the other hand, pay attention only to their attempts to spin this devastating revelation as something other than what it is and then hysterically accuse others of lying for looking only at the true part.

Has this entire time?

ROTLFMFAO!!! You didn't bother to read anything that you posted, did you?

Conveniently omitted was THIS statement in the CNN article (which incidentally is now almost a year old).

"It's a surprising finding because several other studies have found no benefit from hydroxychloroquine, a drug originally developed to treat and prevent malaria. President Donald Trump touted the drug heavily, but later studies found not only did patients not do better if they got the drug, they were more likely to suffer cardiac side effects."

Oops. You are a fucking clown.

 

[Bulletbob]

Take a math class you fucking moron.

learn to read and check things before you open your mouth and make a fool out of yourself.

https://www.news-medical.net/news/2...ival,,in any study of any intervention so far.

 

[Concart]

learn to read and check things before you open your mouth and make a fool out of yourself.

https://www.news-medical.net/news/2...ival,,in any study of any intervention so far.

In a handful of VENTILATED patients. Over 80% of those patients die.

 

[Bulletbob]

In a handful of VENTILATED patients. Over 80% of those patients die.

read the article

 

[Concart]

read the article

I did. Apparently you did not. Suit yourself.

 

[christiefan915]

Now that it's no longer necessary for Democrats to keep us from instantly and effortlessly brushing off COVID with an already known 50-year cure, they have finally stopped intentionally lying about it and started admitting that it likely worked all along...but they weren't willing to take the chance of that turning out to be true until now, so they just lied through their teeth non-stop about it being proven ineffective or even harmful.

But now that Resident Biden has been installed in place of the election winner, there's no longer any reason to prevent this nothing virus from being tossed aside, so they admit the truth...

CNN: "Their study of 2,541 hospitalized patients found that those given hydroxychloroquine were much less likely to die."

View attachment 20107

---

For the record, this is not new. We've known all along that it works on COVID. Democrats just lied about it incessantly until everyone was afraid to take it:

A New Study Shows, Again, That Hydroxychloroquine Works

Study finds hydroxychloroquine helped coronavirus patients survive better

Thousands of Doctors: Yes, Hydroxychloroquine Works Against Wuhan Coronavirus

Yale epidemiologist says hydroxychloroquine could save up to 100K lives if used for coronavirus

Also for the record, this was posted early on in this crisis, when Democrats first started murdering people with this deliberate lie that kept them from taking medicine they needed:

"Thousands of doctors admit Hydroxychloroquine works quickly and effectively against COVID, and that they would prescribe it for their own family members, yet Democrats repeatedly lied about it, attacked President Trump for pointing out how promising it was early on (before being forced to admit he was right), tried to smear him (the President who refuses his own salary) as trying to personally profit from it, and even falsely blamed him when random people absurdly tried ingesting non-medicinal Hydroxychloroquine with fatal results. Their intentional lies about this treatment cost thousands of people their lives."
​

---

Inane. Nobody stopped doctors from prescribing hydroxychloroquine, or people from taking it.

 

[christiefan915]

No one said that. Try to keep up.

What was claimed was that they relentlessly lied and scaremongered everyone into being afraid to take the drug that would have saved their life. In criminal court, you would literally be convicted of murder if you stood over someone having a heart attack and lied to them about their heart medication being poison.

That's what Democrats did. Knowingly. For selfish, partisan gain. You people are the most reprehensible scumbags ever.

So Democrats are reprehensible, selfish scumbags that nobody should ever pay attention to, except about hydroxychloroquine.

 

[artichoke]

You need a time out.

Clever comeback.

Hint: Don't relentlessly spam people with the same 4 moronic fallacies over and over and then act like they're being weird when they make a template for copying and pasting for the next fifty times you spam them with it.

So you're saying you and Trump convinced them to buy those doses

Never said anything like that. Learn how to read, imbecile.

SCIENCE convinced them to buy those doses. Anti-science Democrat scaremongering kept anyone from buying it, so it sat there.

but then Democrats (who have no power in Oklahoma) convinced Oklahoma to not use any of the doses they just bought?

And we're back to you saying obviously moronic things. People refusing to buy something means it does not get bought. You can comprehend THAT much, right?

Not what ad hominem is, you stupid bastard (<-THAT is ad hominem).

BOTH are, you ACTUALLY stupid bastard.

And I quote (from literally the very first thing that comes up on Google):

"Ad hominem is a logical fallacy that involves a personal attack: an argument based on the perceived failings of an adversary rather than on the merits of the case."​

Nothing about that indicates that it has to be name-calling, dumb-ass. As usual, this is just you doing what you do best. Being provably wrong.

Next.

And your lack of action on 1/6 is wholly relevant to this debate because it speaks to your sincerity.

You say you sincerely believe the election was stolen, but you didn't do anything about it even though the magnitude of what you're alleging requires personal action on your part.

So you ran your big mouth, trying to convince other people to do the things you're too chickenshit to do yourself.

Pathological LV426 Lunacy #1

Problems with the moronic fallacy you are relentlessly spamming this site with about how only domestic terrorists can object to election theft:

-It is invalid logic. It is an ad hominem fallacy (trying to shift the debate to attacking the debater personally instead of attacking their argument) as well as a non-sequiter fallacy (the logic simply does not follow).

-You don't get to arbitrarily invent rules about how people are allowed to respond to a given problem and then psychotically harass them about it for 50 pages straight on a thread that has nothing to do with your absurd fallacy in the first place. Different people can have different solutions to the same problem. Not that it is any of your business how anyone chooses to respond to election theft.

-But even playing along with the obviously stupid and invalid "logic" that if you didn't attack the Capitol Building, then you cannot possibly disagree with the election being stolen, what about poor people, people who live far away, injured people, sick people, people who just had a death in the family, people who had jury duty or who were in jail? Can THEY not have attacked the Capitol Building and still have some random online idiot's permission to disagree?

-It is an idiotic attempt to taunt, goad, and troll anyone who disagrees with election theft. No one is ever going to think this ridiculous line of reasoning is compelling. It is completely ineffective and makes you look childish, obnoxious, and dense.

-By this garbage logic, every Democrat is a coward for peddling the most hysterical conspiracy theories about President Trump being a secret Russian agent and them not responding by invading the White House. Even addressing something so clearly ludicrous seems beneath anything to which any member of this site should ever be expected to subject themselves.

 

[artichoke]

by using it your chances of survival was 200 percent better