How many eggs do Republucans have in the Trump Basket?

Amadeus said:
Yes, relative to what they were in the previous generation. Just look at how liberal America has become compared to what it was in, say, the 1800s. Or the 1950s. Or the 1990s. One thing is abundantly clear -- liberalism has incrementally prevailed.



Theocracy ends up on the conservative spectrum.
Click to expand...

only traditionally because religious values are what we have deviated from. if we moved towards it, you would be a conservative if you were against it. the terms themselves are meaningless. it's relative.
 
Threedee said:
Why would a liberal (meaning leftist) defend theocracy? One of the reasons why I cited 1790s France and 1920s Russia is because the left abolished religion in both instances. By comparison, modern leftists merely work toward incrementalism. As for actual liberals, Jefferson tended to be pro-religion, and utilized government resources toward that end. He naturally opposed the state churches established in MA and CT, as well as state constitutions which established "the Christian religion," such as VA.
Click to expand...

you missed my point completely.
 
The Zax said:
you missed my point completely.
Click to expand...

Well, I get where you're coming from with the post about relative conservatism, because that is a non-ideological sort of conservatism. However, most often these days we encounter movement conservatism of one form or another, which is undeterred by where society was, or is heading.
 
Thing1 said:
The main point is that Trump is redefining the GOP itself.

The party itself already seems lost, less than a year in. After 4 years, it won't be recognizable - which I know is what some (if not many) on the right want.

I can't help but think there will ultimately be a lot of regret for this. It's hard to see the new "Trumpian" party build the kind of lasting coalition that would be needed for real change. But who knows. I've been wrong before, right?
Click to expand...

you've been on a humble streak lately. much more chill. you must be getting laid more.
 
Amadumbass said:
The flame flickers brightly before it goes out. And even these ugly nationalists are generally more progressive than their parents. Look at the social and racial battles you're fighting now compared to those of the 1960s.
Click to expand...

There you go again with the moronic false narratives. Its apparent you live in a parallel universe of lies and distortions.

The only battle right now is against the ugly race hustling false narratives of the left.
 
LittleThingy said:
The main point is that Trump is redefining the GOP itself.

The party itself already seems lost, less than a year in. After 4 years, it won't be recognizable - which I know is what some (if not many) on the right want.

I can't help but think there will ultimately be a lot of regret for this. It's hard to see the new "Trumpian" party build the kind of lasting coalition that would be needed for real change. But who knows. I've been wrong before, right?
Click to expand...

Another laughably stupid prediction from LittleThingy. Meanwhile, the Democratic Party of the Jackass continues to implode with a complete lack of direction or leadership and continues to lose elections.
 
The Zax said:
you've been on a humble streak lately. much more chill. you must be getting laid more.
Click to expand...

Wrong; he's realizing the fake narratives he constantly parrots are actually false.

When you get so much so terribly wrong in such a short time, it is bound to humble even the most ignorant among us.
 
cawacko said:
Many of you here on the left like talking Republican issues but almost never talk about what's going on with your own party. I mean many look at Bernie Sanders as your leader. What's your future there?
Click to expand...

um no he is not idiot


the bernie people often were not even registered to vote.


The russian fake news program was directed at the bernie people as well as republicans.



when this all goes down guess who will look bad ?


Bernie the not really a democratic party memeber and his willingness to abide by the russian lies to aid his campaign and the entire republican party including this new trumpian sector of your party.


it may be NO ONE even wants to save the tainted name



the facts will come out in full


and the facts will out the fools
 
Thing1 said:
The main point is that Trump is redefining the GOP itself.

The party itself already seems lost, less than a year in. After 4 years, it won't be recognizable - which I know is what some (if not many) on the right want.

I can't help but think there will ultimately be a lot of regret for this. It's hard to see the new "Trumpian" party build the kind of lasting coalition that would be needed for real change. But who knows. I've been wrong before, right?
Click to expand...

remember me predicting the Retrumpagain party



here it is
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top