How does DOUBLING everyone's tax sound?

[Onceler]

no wonder you're such a failure...you don't have to start a small business with debt
you like debt, you said yourself, you supported huge debt at least twice. why lie about it?

:lol:

Gotta love that simplistic Yurtsie way of debating.

Okay, Yurtsie - for those poor small business guys & gals who actually do have to take out loans & start w/ debt...do you think they "like" the actual debt?

Yes or no will do on that one. This is actually really fun....

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

you made a stupid comment and now you're throwing out red herrings to cover up for your idiocy

yawn

 

[Onceler]

LOL - didn't think you could answer.

Too bad, Yurtsie. To conclude, people who have to add to debt, or who support measures that do, do not "like" the debt.

Thanks for finally admitting that; exhausting, as usual....

 

[Cancel 2018. 3]

typical boring canned onceler response...instead of honestly admitting you made an incorrect and stupid comment...throw red herrings and claim someone "admits" something when they did not admit anything...

all you have are lies and canned moronic statements

how smart you are onceler

 

[Onceler]

Are you really interested in continuing this beatdown?

Yes, Yurtsie - not all small businesses have to start with debt. I've gotta remember next time that when you're floundering, you'll hone in on anything to change the topic & avoid further embarassment.

As for dumb comments - yes, it's dumb to say that someone "likes debt," because they support a measure that will add to debt. By that criteria, I'd wager that almost every American "likes debt," including you.

LOL - really dumb, Yurtsie...

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

Consider the finding of a 2008 study by Congress's Government Accountability Office: In 2005, it found, about 1 in 4 large corporations paid no corporate income tax.

That's despite an official tax rate that calls for firms to pay 35 percent of their earnings to the federal government.

The reasons (not enumerated in the GAO study) include that many companies had no net profits to be taxed. But tax policies that corporations have lobbied for over the years also played a role in the outcome. Tax credits, overseas tax-shelter strategies, and tax benefits for stock-option awards to executives are among the key factors reducing corporate taxes.

"If we're going to have welfare for needy corporations," says tax expert Robert McIntyre, the oil industry is "not on the list." But he pushes that logic a step further: Why have tax policies that amount to welfare for corporations, he wonders, especially at a time when the federal government is running gaping deficits?

Arguments for corporate tax reform are being heard more loudly this year from tax specialists who are both liberal (Mr. McIntyre is director of the left-leaning Citizens for Tax Justice) and conservative. Such reform is viewed now as a crucial part of any serious effort to curb federal deficits over the long term.

​

The official corporate tax rate of 35 percent is higher than rates in other advanced economies, because of tax cuts in those nations over the past three decades. But when it comes to the amount of money that companies actually pay in taxes, a 2007 US Treasury study found that American companies pay less in taxes than their counterparts based overseas.

US companies in the period from 2000 to 2005 paid taxes equal to 13.4 percent of their "operating surplus" (one way to measure profits), the study found. In advanced industrial nations overall, taxes totaled 16.1 percent of operating surplus.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politi...reap-tax-breaks.-Is-picking-on-Big-Oil-unfair

​

​

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

Um... YES... it does.... the total deficits of all previous Presidents is equal to the national debt at the time Bush left office ditzie.... that number again is over $10 Trillion. Yes, Obama has been bad. Yes, his average deficit dwarfs what the left got pissy about under Bush (despite the fact that Bush's largest deficit was with a Dem led Congress). But the FACT remains that Obama has not even come close to matching all of his predecessors combined. If he continues on his current pace, then yes... he likely will have doubled the debt should he be President for two terms. But that is not a FACT ditzie, that is a GUESS. We don't even know if he is going to be re-elected. I also do not disagree that his policies are going to be detrimental (especially the health care fiasco) to the future budgets/debt.... but we don't know how detrimental.

Bottom line is this.... He has NOT done what you said was 'FACT'. That much we do know.

Look, you fucking ignorant retard, I explained it to you once, but apparently you have a reading comprehension problem. Let me go over this really slowwwwly for you.... What you are failing to account for, is OBAMACARE!! You know, that massive $10 trillion boondoggle Obama sacked us with last year? Did you forget about that? Did you think the funding for it was magically pulled out of Nancy Pelosi's ass? Does the cost of that not fall on President Obama? In your retarded state, do you somehow think the national debt already includes the cost of Obamacare? So fucking add $10 trillion more on to Obama's tab, what do you get, fucktard? I come up with Obama has outspent ALL PREVIOUS PRESIDENTS COMBINED! Now shut the fuck up unless you have something intelligent to say... (which I doubt!)

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

Every post you make under the Confederate flag probably gains Obama votes, Dix.

Keep up the good work.

Maybe so... since that would probably be the only thing approaching a sane reason to vote for Obama!

 

[Bonestorm]

Basically, Dixie thinks Obama should have ended the wars, terminated the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit and repealed the Bush tax cuts (among other Bush policies) immediately upon taking office.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

Look, you fucking ignorant retard, I explained it to you once, but apparently you have a reading comprehension problem. Let me go over this really slowwwwly for you.... What you are failing to account for, is OBAMACARE!! You know, that massive $10 trillion boondoggle Obama sacked us with last year? Did you forget about that? Did you think the funding for it was magically pulled out of Nancy Pelosi's ass? Does the cost of that not fall on President Obama? In your retarded state, do you somehow think the national debt already includes the cost of Obamacare? So fucking add $10 trillion more on to Obama's tab, what do you get, fucktard? I come up with Obama has outspent ALL PREVIOUS PRESIDENTS COMBINED! Now shut the fuck up unless you have something intelligent to say... (which I doubt!)

I know you are desperate to spin this ditzie, but the above is just sad. You do not add what MIGHT happen and proclaim it to have already happened. I would also love to see your source for 'Obamacare will add $10 Trillion to the debt'.... because while it will indeed add to the debt, I have not seen any stats that say it will be that high.

that said, since your panties are in such a bunch as it is given that I have once again shown you to be an idiot...... what the hell.... 1/3

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

I know you are desperate to spin this ditzie, but the above is just sad. You do not add what MIGHT happen and proclaim it to have already happened. I would also love to see your source for 'Obamacare will add $10 Trillion to the debt'.... because while it will indeed add to the debt, I have not seen any stats that say it will be that high.

that said, since your panties are in such a bunch as it is given that I have once again shown you to be an idiot...... what the hell.... 1/3

I've not SPUN anything here... it appears that's what YOU are trying to do! You want to conveniently forget to count the single largest entitlement program in the history of the world, which is Obama's signature 'accomplishment.' Just completely ignore that, and he has still rung up a massive debt the likes we have never seen in American history. Take Obamacare completely out of the equation, and he still ranks as the highest spending president of all time.

Several analytical sources have calculated the cost of Obamacare over the next 20 years, you are welcome to do your own research, I am finding their estimates to be between 7 and 10 trillion dollars. And no, that isn't already included in the national debt, and won't be counted until the money is allocated somewhere down the road. In fact, the bulk of that cost will not kick in for 10 more years, because it had to be set up that way for the CBO to score it as they did, and for Democrats to claim it "reduced the deficit!" But.... it does still count as Obama spending! When you add that to the unprecedented spending already, his total is greater than all other presidents combined. That's what I stated, that's what I stand by.

 

[Guns Guns Guns]

I've not SPUN anything here... it appears that's what YOU are trying to do! You want to conveniently forget to count the single largest entitlement program in the history of the world, which is Obama's signature 'accomplishment.' Just completely ignore that, and he has still rung up a massive debt the likes we have never seen in American history. Take Obamacare completely out of the equation, and he still ranks as the highest spending president of all time.

Several analytical sources have calculated the cost of Obamacare over the next 20 years, you are welcome to do your own research, I am finding their estimates to be between 7 and 10 trillion dollars. And no, that isn't already included in the national debt, and won't be counted until the money is allocated somewhere down the road. In fact, the bulk of that cost will not kick in for 10 more years, because it had to be set up that way for the CBO to score it as they did, and for Democrats to claim it "reduced the deficit!" But.... it does still count as Obama spending! When you add that to the unprecedented spending already, his total is greater than all other presidents combined. That's what I stated, that's what I stand by.

I thought you Tea-tards were going to repeal Obamacare, Dix?

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

I thought you Tea-tards were going to repeal Obamacare, Dix?

Even IF that transpires, or even if you want to completely ignore Obamacare, like Supertard does, Obama still holds the title for Most Fiscally Irresponsible President, and no one else even comes close.