How do you have a world without war with sociopaths running countries?

Status
Not open for further replies.
and the idiots have played the far left so well as to warp the ideas of what is right.


the far left is going to help the right wing win this one and the chemical use stay in play.

WHY??????


what the hell do you think you are doing GOOD for mankind?
 
we are proving the world that Its ok to chemically poisen the people you don't want to live so you can retain power.


The right in this country WANTS to repete what Ronny Reagan and Bush were willing to do.

BREAK the rules against chemical weapons.


Yet they want Obama to be punished for stopping the world wide hated use of chemicals to kill people.

You only care that they were gassed. You don't care that they were murdered. In fact you don't even care that they were gassed. You care that your boy has looked foolish. Party over principle. That is you to a tee baby
 
and the idiots have played the far left so well as to warp the ideas of what is right.


the far left is going to help the right wing win this one and the chemical use stay in play.

WHY??????


what the hell do you think you are doing GOOD for mankind?


Desh; charity begins at home. How many more of OUR children need to die in a fruitless effort to effect change in a culture of death? You do realise that the ME is a culture of death right?

We can't change that no matter what we sacrifice.
 
This is why I put you on ignore.
I thought perhaps with a matter of such grave import as this, you might have some valid input, so I checked you out again.

Clearly I was wrong, and Billy was right, you are not worth it.

Before I re-list you though, do you actually disagree with the comments of the last decent republican?


Well ILA, do you have a reply or should you just be ignored as most of the sane people here think?
This is your chance to show whether you add value or not.
 
The world

THE ENTIRE WORLD

decided that chem weapons were evil beyond all other "weapons".




WHY???????
 
This is why I put you on ignore.
I thought perhaps with a matter of such grave import as this, you might have some valid input, so I checked you out again.

Clearly I was wrong, and Billy was right, you are not worth it.

Before I re-list you though, do you actually disagree with the comments of the last decent republican?

Well, when I hear liberals describe what they consider a "decent" republican, it always makes me leery. Typically it means a republican that is more leftist aka Teddy Roosevelt.

As far as Eisenhower's claim of the "military industrial complex", I don't deny that there are those who have a vested interest at keeping a nation at war. Countries have been doing that for years. That is why the Founders devised our system so that Congress had to "VOTE" to declare war. Ironically enough, the last time they did that was a war that led to Eisenhower becoming President. So, that military industrial complex sure had hand in Eisenhower's career.


However, OBOMBA is the boss. He wanted to sit in the big chair. He spend a billion dollars to do it. You are implying that there are forces out of his control. Which implies that he is feckless and a mere figure head. Is that what you mean to imply? If so, you only serve to enforce my opinion of the big eared loser.

Carry on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top