Into the Night
Verified User
You have no proof. "RQAA" just makes you look like even more of a fool than we already know you are.
Oh, no. I used up my one response to you and it's only 5am.
Too bad. See you tomorrow!
RQAA.
You have no proof. "RQAA" just makes you look like even more of a fool than we already know you are.
Oh, no. I used up my one response to you and it's only 5am.
Too bad. See you tomorrow!
the chain of custody of too many ballots is unproveable. the elections are now a farce.
People just sell them to the Democrats to fill in as they wish. All voting must be in person and same day with paper ballots and all counting done by humans with cameras filming every ballot they examine.
Chain of custody? In order for a ballot to count it is directed to the precinct on the envelope. Once there, it is checked for a signature match.. https://www.parascript.com/solutions-by-industry/government/vote-by-mail-signature-verification/ If it is accepted the voter's name in the precinct book is marked as VOTED. Therefore, no other votes can be accepted for that name. If the name is not in the precinct book, it is redirected to that precinct. If no such name is in the book and it is in the precinct on the envelope, the authorities are called. Your "thinking" is farcical. Conspiracy nuts are bad for the country. You should be ashamed.

If a person lived in an apartment and moved to another state. Their ballot would be sent to their apartment and could be fraudulently used.In my experience, it was automatic. It was the first step after checking to see if the voter was in the logbook. Note of course, if they do not check signatures in this specific case, there is still one vote per person whose name is in the precinct logbook. A pile of votes does not matter. Checking the name in the logbook assures that.
The elections process is checked after every election.
in person, day of, no computer voting is best.
People just sell them to the Democrats to fill in as they wish. All voting must be in person and same day with paper ballots and all counting done by humans with cameras filming every ballot they examine.
People just sell them to the Democrats to fill in as they wish. All voting must be in person and same day with paper ballots and all counting done by humans with cameras filming every ballot they examine.

If a person lived in an apartment and moved to another state. Their ballot would be sent to their apartment and could be fraudulently used.
Nobody on either side should receive a ballot that does not belong to them. It has happened multiple times.That must happen millions of times in an election, and I suppose only Dems move. Do you really think that scenario has relevance? It has been noted that rich people with several homes could get more than one ballot. But of course, before the next election, they would get a summons.
it used to be that way. All paper ballots and counted by humans. But that didn't work very well either since the counters had their own political biases and would deliberately miscount. So we went to machines because "machines have to do what they're programmed to do." HAHAHA Another failure.
Elections don't work.
lets eliminate mail in balloting. now the 200,000 members of the military cant vote. The nine million or so Americans living abroad cant vote. The infirmed, elderly, hospitalized, institutionalized cant vote.
Sounds like a wonderful idea.
Chain of custody? In order for a ballot to count it is directed to the precinct on the envelope. Once there, it is checked for a signature match.. https://www.parascript.com/solutions-by-industry/government/vote-by-mail-signature-verification/ If it is accepted the voter's name in the precinct book is marked as VOTED. Therefore, no other votes can be accepted for that name. If the name is not in the precinct book, it is redirected to that precinct. If no such name is in the book and it is in the precinct on the envelope, the authorities are called. Your "thinking" is farcical. Conspiracy nuts are bad for the country. You should be ashamed.

why do you hate election security?
Why do you hate people voting?
mail in should be minimized. thats more secure.
that's an undeniable truth.
Mail in voting has been used regularly in several states for years with no issues. All you have is another excuse to keep people from voting.
there are issues.