How can you have honest elections when half the ballots are MAIL-INS??

the chain of custody of too many ballots is unproveable. the elections are now a farce.

Chain of custody? In order for a ballot to count it is directed to the precinct on the envelope. Once there, it is checked for a signature match.. https://www.parascript.com/solutions-by-industry/government/vote-by-mail-signature-verification/ If it is accepted the voter's name in the precinct book is marked as VOTED. Therefore, no other votes can be accepted for that name. If the name is not in the precinct book, it is redirected to that precinct. If no such name is in the book and it is in the precinct on the envelope, the authorities are called. Your "thinking" is farcical. Conspiracy nuts are bad for the country. You should be ashamed.
 
People just sell them to the Democrats to fill in as they wish. All voting must be in person and same day with paper ballots and all counting done by humans with cameras filming every ballot they examine.

I hope idiots like you fucking die, and your ass grows together, thinking you have been fucked up the pooper chute by the Democrats!

I don't give a FUCK about your obvious paranoid schizophrenia and tiny-fisted little sissy fits anymore!

You don't like it- TRY STORMING THE CAPITAL BUILDING AGAIN! I DARE YOU!

Nothing would give me any more pleasure than to watch you get shot through through your slack-jawed fucking neck by the Capital Police for breaking and entering!
 
Chain of custody? In order for a ballot to count it is directed to the precinct on the envelope. Once there, it is checked for a signature match.. https://www.parascript.com/solutions-by-industry/government/vote-by-mail-signature-verification/ If it is accepted the voter's name in the precinct book is marked as VOTED. Therefore, no other votes can be accepted for that name. If the name is not in the precinct book, it is redirected to that precinct. If no such name is in the book and it is in the precinct on the envelope, the authorities are called. Your "thinking" is farcical. Conspiracy nuts are bad for the country. You should be ashamed.

:blah:
 

In my experience, it was automatic. It was the first step after checking to see if the voter was in the logbook. Note of course, if they do not check signatures in this specific case, there is still one vote per person whose name is in the precinct logbook. A pile of votes does not matter. Checking the name in the logbook assures that.
 
In my experience, it was automatic. It was the first step after checking to see if the voter was in the logbook. Note of course, if they do not check signatures in this specific case, there is still one vote per person whose name is in the precinct logbook. A pile of votes does not matter. Checking the name in the logbook assures that.
If a person lived in an apartment and moved to another state. Their ballot would be sent to their apartment and could be fraudulently used.
 
in person, day of, no computer voting is best.

it used to be that way. All paper ballots and counted by humans. But that didn't work very well either since the counters had their own political biases and would deliberately miscount. So we went to machines because "machines have to do what they're programmed to do." HAHAHA Another failure.


Elections don't work.
 
People just sell them to the Democrats to fill in as they wish. All voting must be in person and same day with paper ballots and all counting done by humans with cameras filming every ballot they examine.

lets eliminate mail in balloting. now the 200,000 members of the military cant vote. The nine million or so Americans living abroad cant vote. The infirmed, elderly, hospitalized, institutionalized cant vote.
Sounds like a wonderful idea.
 
If a person lived in an apartment and moved to another state. Their ballot would be sent to their apartment and could be fraudulently used.

That must happen millions of times in an election, and I suppose only Dems move. Do you really think that scenario has relevance? It has been noted that rich people with several homes could get more than one ballot. But of course, before the next election, they would get a summons.
 
That must happen millions of times in an election, and I suppose only Dems move. Do you really think that scenario has relevance? It has been noted that rich people with several homes could get more than one ballot. But of course, before the next election, they would get a summons.
Nobody on either side should receive a ballot that does not belong to them. It has happened multiple times.
 
it used to be that way. All paper ballots and counted by humans. But that didn't work very well either since the counters had their own political biases and would deliberately miscount. So we went to machines because "machines have to do what they're programmed to do." HAHAHA Another failure.


Elections don't work.

it was better under hand human counted sans machina.
 
lets eliminate mail in balloting. now the 200,000 members of the military cant vote. The nine million or so Americans living abroad cant vote. The infirmed, elderly, hospitalized, institutionalized cant vote.
Sounds like a wonderful idea.

why do you hate election security?
 
Chain of custody? In order for a ballot to count it is directed to the precinct on the envelope. Once there, it is checked for a signature match.. https://www.parascript.com/solutions-by-industry/government/vote-by-mail-signature-verification/ If it is accepted the voter's name in the precinct book is marked as VOTED. Therefore, no other votes can be accepted for that name. If the name is not in the precinct book, it is redirected to that precinct. If no such name is in the book and it is in the precinct on the envelope, the authorities are called. Your "thinking" is farcical. Conspiracy nuts are bad for the country. You should be ashamed.

Ok, pollyanna.
:okjen:

lie to me harder.
 
there are issues.

There are issues with any type of voting, the system isn't perfect, yet you cannot find and document any substantial fraud in mail in ballots. Lets face it, the Republican Party is in the minority, and the more people they can keep from voting, the better their chances are.
 
Back
Top