Honest question for Confederate flag lovers: Why are you so proud of losing?

[USFREEDOM911]

And you have this amusing need to have the last word.... think I'll put you on ignore so you can get all frustrated and take it out on the 50 cats you have down in Mom's basement...

Liberal posters have stated that putting someone on IA is the act of a coward.

 

[Howey]

Liberal posters have stated that putting someone on IA is the act of a coward.

Proof even I can be wrong once in a blue moon.

 

[Steelplate]

Ahhh....that's better...you know, it's too fucking bad that people have to be shitheels.

Someday, I'll find a forum where people can talk, debate and even argue rationally. Until then, this one will do....minus an aforementioned shitheel and her alias.

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

Wow...read a lot in a short post, didn't you? No...the problem is not "their skin". I've addressed the problems.... you just don't want to hear it....but let me fucking recap.

Well, I am asking you what is their problem "to begin with" that can't be overcome, and that's the only thing I am getting so far.

Education. The way our education system works is at the local level....based on local taxes collected....therefore wealthy neighborhoods who can afford to pay higher taxes get the best teachers...because they can pay more and those neighborhoods are desirable locations to live...that slowly declines into our inner city slums, where the poorest people live and have lived for decades. They don't have a pot to piss in and they can't afford quality educators.they get the dregs of academics and some good teachers who want to make a difference... at least till they get burned out....and it's been that way for decades, so the parents of current students don't have the skills to help them achieve.

Again, this has not been the case in our public education system for about 50 years. I can reel off a rather long list of federal programs implemented since 1965, to mitigate the circumstances of poor communities with regard to public schools. Programs specifically targeted to minority families and their children, billions of dollars in scholarships provided by the public and private sector for minorities. Billions more spent revitalizing urban neighborhoods, helping with housing costs, food costs, and health care. A Head Start program to essentially provide free child care, free school lunches, even midnight basketball programs.

But the one thing we just can't seem to fix, is that darn black skin problem they have! As long as their skin continues to keep being black, we will always be dealing with people who just can't do anything about the conditions they were born with, and it's up to us to provide things for them, in order that they might be "equal" to those of us without this black skin problem.

But you don't want to hear that.

I wanted to hear how black people "to begin with" have some problem they can't overcome, and the only thing we've established so far is, they have black skin that white people aren't cursed with. They have desegregated schools, all kinds of government programs to help them, but it's never enough because it doesn't make them white. Being that they aren't white, they can't be expected to have the wherewithal to improve their communities, and it's unfair of white folks to assume they could do this, they are black people, after all... right?

You also don't want to hear that businesses don't want to invest there for the same reasons.

Well, again... we've passed all kinds of laws to incentivize business in areas of urban renewal, but what can we expect? Business obviously doesn't care that black people can't find jobs because of their skin. We should pass some kind of law that forces business to hire more black people... oh wait... Well... we should do MORE of that, right? Since, obviously, "to begin with" they are born with black skin, therefore, are incapable of competing in the job market with people who don't have the skin problem.

You don't want to hear that poverty = desperation. Desperation= a desire for escape=drug and alcohol abuse=addiction=crime=violence and gangs and shootings and further decay.

You're right... and these black skin people can't help this because... well... they have that skin problem! Poor white people have no trouble overcoming these adversities, because they must be more intelligent or superior in some way, they are white! And let's face it, since they have black skin, they can't be expected to achieve very much without our help. Of course, for the sake of making this argument, we can completely forget about all the upper-middle class and wealthy black neighborhoods around the country, because they don't help make this point at all. We can dismiss the countless examples of black people who came from abject poverty to become super-wealthy, someone forgot to tell them that black skin people can't achieve these levels of success. No... we need to keep propagating the myth that all black skin people are poor and can't help it because of their skin.

It has nothing to do with skin tone and everything to do with lack of opportunity and shitty living conditions.

As I have articulated, they have the same opportunity as everyone else. We made this the law of the land about 48 years ago, and we've instituted hundreds of special programs to help mitigate the disadvantages and living conditions. That only leaves their skin problem, which obviously keeps them poor, disadvantaged, and unable to ever achieve success.

If roles were reversed, we'd have inner city slums of us white people shooting each other in the street, while well to do black people would be bitching about taxes and working class black people would be bitching about the first Caucasian in the White House.

I can't imagine. But I am curious about this "roles" business you mention. Does different color skin make you assume a different "role" in life? I guess I can kinda see that, being they are obviously black and unable to compete equally with white folks because of it. I suppose when black children come to the realization their skin is always going to be black, they just resign themselves to being poor the rest of their lives and letting white liberals care for them, because hey... they can't help their condition. Right?

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Ahhh....that's better...you know, it's too fucking bad that people have to be shitheels.

Someday, I'll find a forum where people can talk, debate and even argue rationally. Until then, this one will do....minus an aforementioned shitheel and her alias.

Instead of speaking in asswipe, could you translate your post to english.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Instead of speaking in asswipe, could you translate your post to english.

Allow me. He is tired of getting his ass kicked by conservatives so he is going to go run and hide under HowAIDS skirt. He is looking for a forum where everyone will agree with him and take his talking points as the starting premise for every discussion. A "reasonable" republican to him is one that abandons all principle and sides with leftards.

In short. He is every other liberal you have come across on a message board

 

[Justin Time]

From 1882-1968, 4,743 lynchings occurred in the United States. Of these people that were lynched 3,446 were black. The blacks lynched accounted for 72.7% of the people lynched. These numbers seem large, but it is known that not all of the lynchings were ever recorded. Out of the 4,743 people lynched only 1,297 white people were lynched. That is only 27.3%. Many of the whites lynched were lynched for helping the black or being anti lynching and even for domestic crimes.

http://www.chesnuttarchive.org/classroom/lynchingstat.html

and in 2008, with the support of southern states, America elected its first black President

In 2012, again with support of southern states, America re-elected that same President

It is amazing to watch liberals, who claim to hate any kind of racism, turn a blind eye towards the racism (that came from the left) toward those blacks who did not support Obama in the last election

The disgusting racial slurs leveled at Stacy Dash and Mia Love were ignored by Obama supports and the liberal media

When Michael Steele ran for the Senate in 2006 elected Democrats in MD used racial slurs and "justified" those comments by saying race trumps party

When it comes to any conservative black, the left shows what real racism really is

Does the name Dr Ben Carson mean anything to you?

 

[canceled.2021.1]

and in 2008, with the support of southern states, America elected its first black President

In 2012, again with support of southern states, America re-elected that same President

It is amazing to watch liberals, who claim to hate any kind of racism, turn a blind eye towards the racism (that came from the left) toward those blacks who did not support Obama in the last election

The disgusting racial slurs leveled at Stacy Dash and Mia Love were ignored by Obama supports and the liberal media

When Michael Steele ran for the Senate in 2006 elected Democrats in MD used racial slurs and "justified" those comments by saying race trumps party

When it comes to any conservative black, the left shows what real racism really is

Does the name Dr Ben Carson mean anything to you?

Can Obama really count? He is half white and the darky that is in him didnt experience US style slavery.

But, lets be honest. The liberals are over the porch monkeys. They have moved to the wetbacks as a preferable minority to pander to.

One has to wonder how the tar babies will take being kicked to the curb fr Paco the house painter.

 

[Justin Time]

Can Obama really count? He is half white and the darky that is in him didnt experience US style slavery.

But, lets be honest. The liberals are over the porch monkeys. They have moved to the wetbacks as a preferable minority to pander to.

One has to wonder how the tar babies will take being kicked to the curb fr Paco the house painter.

Yes Obama does count

and the history of liberal racism toward black conservatives is a fact as well as disgusting

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Yes Obama does count

and the history of liberal racism toward black conservatives is a fact as well as disgusting

True. But in liberal fantasy land any black conservative is nothing more than an Uncle Tom and sell out to their race because they ain't "down wit da struggle".

I do remember when ole Jessa Jackson was caught on a hot mic saying he wanted to castrate Maobama. That was truly funny. Now Jessas boy is finished as a politician. There is justice.

 

[Justin Time]

True. But in liberal fantasy land any black conservative is nothing more than an Uncle Tom and sell out to their race because they ain't "down wit da struggle".

I do remember when ole Jessa Jackson was caught on a hot mic saying he wanted to castrate Maobama. That was truly funny. Now Jessas boy is finished as a politician. There is justice.

Yes liberal racism is away of life and it is acceptable behavior

But liberals will deny this as they will claim to be the "tolerant" ones

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Yes liberal racism is away of life and it is acceptable behavior

But liberals will deny this as they will claim to be the "tolerant" ones

As let's not forget the lie that liberals tell themselves regarding their racist past. Instead of acknowledging it they simply claim (without proof) mind you that all if the democrats who were racist became republicans. Of course they can only point to one Senator that actually switched parties but hey. Liberals never let facts get in the way of one of their lies.

 

[Justin Time]

Sometime liberals admit and try to defend their blatant racism

From 2005

Black Democratic leaders in Maryland say that racially tinged attacks against Lt. Gov. Michael S. Steele in his bid for the U.S. Senate are fair because he is a conservative Republican.

Such attacks against the first black man to win a statewide election in Maryland include pelting him with Oreo cookies during a campaign appearance, calling him an “Uncle Tom” and depicting him as a black-faced minstrel on a liberal Web log.

Operatives for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) also obtained a copy of his credit report — the only Republican candidate so targeted.

But black Democrats say there is nothing wrong with “pointing out the obvious.”

“There is a difference between pointing out the obvious and calling someone names,” said a campaign spokesman for Kweisi Mfume, a Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate and former president of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People.

State Sen. Lisa A. Gladden, a black Baltimore Democrat, said she does not expect her party to pull any punches, including racial jabs at Mr. Steele, in the race to replace retiring Democratic U.S. Sen. Paul S. Sarbanes.

“Party trumps race, especially on the national level,” she said. “If you are bold enough to run, you have to take whatever the voters are going to give you. It’s democracy, perhaps at its worse, but it is democracy.”

Delegate Salima Siler Marriott, a black Baltimore Democrat, said Mr. Steele invites comparisons to a slave who loves his cruel master or a cookie that is black on the outside and white inside because his conservative political philosophy is, in her view, anti-black.

“Because he is a conservative, he is different than most public blacks, and he is different than most people in our community,” she said. “His politics are not in the best interest of the masses of black people.”

During the 2002 campaign, Democratic supporters pelted Mr. Steele with Oreo cookies during a gubernatorial debate at Morgan State University in Baltimore.


Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2005/nov/1/20051101-104932-4054r/#ixzz2Rld5xMB3
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Sometime liberals admit and try to defend their blatant racism

From 2005

What is more amazing to me is not the left wings racism. That extends all the way back to when the democrats created the KKK and gun control as a way to control those uppity negros.

What is surprising is that Steele sells out in MSNBC as his response. So apparently the left wing bullying tactics work.

 

[Justin Time]

What is more amazing to me is not the left wings racism. That extends all the way back to when the democrats created the KKK and gun control as a way to control those uppity negros.

What is surprising is that Steele sells out in MSNBC as his response. So apparently the left wing bullying tactics work.

Liberals have selective memory when it comes to the 1960's and the Civil Rights bill

Me Steele is one of those R's who thinks if you place nice with liberals they will be nice to you. I wonder if he also set out cookies and mike on Christmas Eve for Santa?

 

[Howey]

Does the name Dr Ben Carson mean anything to you?

Does to me! He's the new token black conservative who made such a fool of himself last month his alma mater wouldn't even let him give the commencement address at their graduation!

He should make Uncle Herman proud.

 

[maineman]

Blacks voted republican in overwhelming margins prior to the middle of the last century. Now, they vote overwhelmingly democratic. Blacks didn't change... the parties did. Republicans can bring up the KKK and try to tie the democratic party of today to the democratic party of yesterday all they want. It's a desperate move to mask the fact that the policies and allegiances of THEIR party have changed and clearly, blacks in America are not buying that bullshit.

 

[DamnYankee]

Blacks voted republican in overwhelming margins prior to the middle of the last century. Now, they vote overwhelmingly democratic. Blacks didn't change... the parties did. Republicans can bring up the KKK and try to tie the democratic party of today to the democratic party of yesterday all they want. It's a desperate move to mask the fact that the policies and allegiances of THEIR party have changed and clearly, blacks in America are not buying that bullshit.

You've always treated blacks special though. Before it was as slaves, then they were objects to terrorize, then segregate, and finally to deny civil rights. The Republican Party has been consistent in defeating you. Now you treat blacks special by giving them freebies. It was a brilliant move.

 

[DamnYankee]

From 1882-1968, 4,743 lynchings occurred in the United States. Of these people that were lynched 3,446 were black. The blacks lynched accounted for 72.7% of the people lynched. These numbers seem large, but it is known that not all of the lynchings were ever recorded. Out of the 4,743 people lynched only 1,297 white people were lynched. That is only 27.3%. Many of the whites lynched were lynched for helping the black or being anti lynching and even for domestic crimes.

http://www.chesnuttarchive.org/classroom/lynchingstat.html

Democrat Party terrorism was aimed at Republicans.

 

[NOVA]

Blacks voted republican in overwhelming margins prior to the middle of the last century. Now, they vote overwhelmingly democratic. Blacks didn't change... the parties did. Republicans can bring up the KKK and try to tie the democratic party of today to the democratic party of yesterday all they want. It's a desperate move to mask the fact that the policies and allegiances of THEIR party have changed and clearly, blacks in America are not buying that bullshit.

Not exactly accurate....people change, everyone changes, thats just the normal state of things. Thats no. 1

Then, you say the parties changed....? Yes, but it was the Democrats that changed, not so much the Republicans....
Gernerally, the Republican have always been for personal freedom and still are....
They have been for personal responsibility, and still are....
They have been for less gov. intrusion, less taxation, free trade, strong military, civil rights and most importantly, the Constitution, and they are still.

The Democrats, being the party of slavery and bigotry, aristocracy of the rich in the south, etc. saw the folly of their ways a mere 60 or so years ago and slowly
did a turn around....swinging from one extreme to the other.....
They became the party of a new brand of socialism and forced social engineering of the populace......by force of governmental law.....
They constantly seek higher taxation to finance as much welfare giveaways as possible, in effect, bribing a larger portion of the population for votes.
They demonize one group of citizens against others to create an enemy to blame for mistakes, the rich, corporations, Republicans, or even individuals as we've seen.

They use the words and meaning of our own Constitution, meanings that stood for well over 2 centuries, to create either new freedoms our of thin air, or
to restrict freedoms that were in effect since the document was written...claiming the words don't mean what they say....a new interpretation as they see things..
They dilute the freedoms our son's and daughters, have died for by bestowing those rights and freedoms on just about anyone that can sneak across our borders....
The list is long, but this is enough to make my point.

The parties have changed.....the Republicans are basically the Party of Lincoln and Washington and the founding fathers.....

The Democrats have been 'born again' in the last few decades into a new party.....a dangerous party, chipping away at the
customs and values on which this nation was built....slowly eroding away the foundations of the US.