Hillary never said all allegations of sex assault should be believed!

PostmodernProphet said:
so was Hillary....as a matter of fact, didn't she get fired from the Warren Commission investigation for not telling the truth?.......
Click to expand...

I suppose you really mean the Watergate investigation, and no, she didn't get fired for lying. You have no mas pantalones.

no-mas.jpg


A pair of articles published during Hillary Clinton's run for the presidency in 2008, one by Northstar Writers Group founder Dan Calabrese and one by Jerry Zeifman himself, asserted that Zeifman was Hillary's supervisor during the Watergate investigation and that he eventually fired her from the investigation for "unethical, dishonest" conduct. However, whatever Zeifman may have thought of Hillary and her work during the investigation, he was not her supervisor, neither he nor anyone else fired her from her position on the Impeachment Inquiry staff (Zeifman in fact didn't have the power to fire her, even had he wanted to do so), his description of her conduct as "unethical" and "dishonest" is his personal, highly subjective characterization, and the "facts" on which he bases that characterization are ones that he has contradicted himself about on multiple occasions.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/zeifman.asp
 
Jarod said:
You idiots know HRC never said all allegations of sexual assault should be believed, she said all victims of sexual assault should be believed, Clearly, she does not believe those who alleged sexual assault by her husband are actually victims of sexual assault.

You fuckers are blinded by the color of your teams jersey!
Click to expand...

The fact is that most women whose husbands are accused of being sexual predators don't believe they are, there are many very public examples of this Jerry Sandusky, Herman Cain, Bill Cosby. Wives tend to believe their husbands over the victims. Doesn't make them right, it just makes them loyal.
 
Rana said:
The fact is that most women whose husbands are accused of being sexual predators don't believe they are, there are many very public examples of this Jerry Sandusky, Herman Cain, Bill Cosby. Wives tend to believe their husbands over the victims. Doesn't make them right, it just makes them loyal.
Click to expand...

Sandusky and Spermin' Herman were Republicans, weren't they?
 
Jarod said:
You idiots know HRC never said all allegations of sexual assault should be believed, she said all victims of sexual assault should be believed, Clearly, she does not believe those who alleged sexual assault by her husband are actually victims of sexual assault.

You fuckers are blinded by the color of your teams jersey!
Click to expand...

The pot says that kettle is black!

Hypocrite much, Jarod?
 
So do the Cons on this thread disagree with HRC on this subject and think someone who IS a victim of sexual abuse should not be believed if they speak out?

Wow!
 
christiefan915 said:
I suppose you really mean the Watergate investigation, and no, she didn't get fired for lying. You have no mas pantalones.

no-mas.jpg


A pair of articles published during Hillary Clinton's run for the presidency in 2008, one by Northstar Writers Group founder Dan Calabrese and one by Jerry Zeifman himself, asserted that Zeifman was Hillary's supervisor during the Watergate investigation and that he eventually fired her from the investigation for "unethical, dishonest" conduct. However, whatever Zeifman may have thought of Hillary and her work during the investigation, he was not her supervisor, neither he nor anyone else fired her from her position on the Impeachment Inquiry staff (Zeifman in fact didn't have the power to fire her, even had he wanted to do so), his description of her conduct as "unethical" and "dishonest" is his personal, highly subjective characterization, and the "facts" on which he bases that characterization are ones that he has contradicted himself about on multiple occasions.

http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/zeifman.asp
Click to expand...

so he did not like her, considered her dishonest and unethical, but he didn't have the power to fire her?......wow, that certainly changes nothing, doesn't it.......
 
Jarod said:
It boiled your "argument" down to its basic element.
Click to expand...

Yes. You indeed repeated what I stated to you, but with more whine. Using a candidates own words against them is magic. It makes the true partisans come out in their full apologist regalia.
 
Damocles said:
Yes. You indeed repeated what I stated to you, but with more whine. Using a candidates own words against them is magic. It makes the true partisans come out in their full apologist regalia.
Click to expand...

Her words were not what you pretended they were... Embarrassing for you!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top