Hillary never said all allegations of sex assault should be believed!

Its clear I was excluded from the other thread on this subject for fear that I was going to point this out.

Wrong; you were probably excluded because they now you are a prolific liar and strawman pontificator. They shouldn't ban you, they should welcome your bloviating as more evidence how dumb Democrats really are.
 
Only those who truly are victim should be believed. Those who are pretending to be victims should not be believed, do you disagree?
yes.....this underscores the stupidity of her comments......because you HAVE to believe those who are pretending are truly victims if you have to believe what they say.....or, there is no reason to believe what any of them say unless you have external proof they are victims......either way, her statements become meaningless......
 
Who shall be the decider of who the true victims are? Are the women claiming to have been sexually assaulted two decades after the fact to be believed? Are they true victims? Why would anyone wait two decades to make such claims?

This is why you're a Democrat; you're a clueless low information dullard who parrots the dimwitted talking points you've gullibly been fed.

You mean women who sit on their allegations, like Juanita Broddrick or Ginnifer Flowers?
 
In a normal year Id agree with you. But the R's are trying to nominate an incredible whackjob, so HRC has a chance.

biglaugh7_zpsd701e485.gif
 
ISIS is a JV team compared to the group that took down the Twin Towers and killed more than 3000 American civilians. Please show me where ISIS has done something comparable to us. ISIS's territory that it controls is contained, and that is what BHO said.

I was critical of Obama on the "you can keep your doctor" that was clearly untrue, some doctors died, some retired, some quit practicing medicine...

But clearly HRC did not say that all allegations of sexual abuse should be believed, she said all victims of sexual abuse should be believed. Do you disagree?

In order to be declared a victim one first has to make an allegation don't they?
 
Nope, a victim is a victim even if she tells nobody.


But, if she tells nobody then there is nothing to believe is there? In order for a victim to be believed, first that victim has to make an allegation. Before you can believe someone, someone has to tell you something. Are you saying you can believe someone was a victim of sexual assault in the absence of hearing, seeing or reading something about it?

You really are a shitty lawyer
 
Back
Top