Hillary didn't get a convention bump.

You posted this early, she had more bump to go:

RJ0lKVX.png


Hillary's was larger than Trumps.
 
Seahawk said:
I understand post convention bumps to be where your numbers are higher than previous pollings.

She went down during the pub convention, then naturally went back up during hers and really, her rise was probably due more to Trump being a retard than her convention.

Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Regardless of the reason she saw in increase in her polling numbers and a significant drop in Trumps polling numbers.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Regardless of the reason she saw in increase in her polling numbers and a significant drop in Trumps polling numbers.
Click to expand...

And Trump starting going way down when he bashed Khan. Her bump really doesn't have much at all to do with her convention. It is just my opinion. I posted a graph after the convention and it showed she merely was back to where she was before the GOP convention.

We'll see in thirty days. I suspect Trump will pull off a massive retard move or three and hillary will continue to rise.
 
Seahawk said:
And Trump starting going way down when he bashed Khan. Her bump really doesn't have much at all to do with her convention. It is just my opinion. I posted a graph after the convention and it showed she merely was back to where she was before the GOP convention.

We'll see in thirty days. I suspect Trump will pull off a massive retard move or three and hillary will continue to rise.
Click to expand...

You're just desperate to prove you were somehow right that the Dem convention was a flop, though pretty much everyone - including conservatives - have said otherwise.

Hillary 100% got a convention bump. It's 100% desperation to ascribe the polls this week to Khan.
 
Thing1 said:
You're just desperate to prove you were somehow right that the Dem convention was a flop, though pretty much everyone - including conservatives - have said otherwise.

Hillary 100% got a convention bump. It's 100% desperation to ascribe the polls this week to Khan.
Click to expand...

Republican Trumptards may say anything in their desperation.
 
Thing1 said:
You're just desperate to prove you were somehow right that the Dem convention was a flop, though pretty much everyone - including conservatives - have said otherwise.

Hillary 100% got a convention bump. It's 100% desperation to ascribe the polls this week to Khan.
Click to expand...

Where did I say it was a flop?

Her rise didn't have much to do with convention, but Trump bashing Khan. You of course want desperately to believe it was because of her convention, I understand. You have gone full Hillary in the past few weeks. Any semblance of non partisanship has flown your coop.
 
Seahawk said:
Where did I say it was a flop?

Her rise didn't have much to do with convention, but Trump bashing Khan. You of course want desperately to believe it was because of her convention, I understand. You have gone full Hillary in the past few weeks. Any semblance of non partisanship has flown your coop.
Click to expand...

She'll be a better President than Trump, by a mile. Her convention was great - you made fun of my posts the whole time, but many conservatives agreed w/ me. And the polls certainly did.

You were wrong. I was right.
 
Thing1 said:
She'll be a better President than Trump, by a mile. Her convention was great - you made fun of my posts the whole time, but many conservatives agreed w/ me. And the polls certainly did.

You were wrong. I was right.
Click to expand...

What are you talking about? Wrong about what?

Still, Clinton’s sudden surge seems to reflect more than a simple post-convention boost.

Not only are her numbers rising, but the polls also show a major recent drop in support for Trump amid a cacophony of controversy that includes ongoing feuds with the Gold Star parents of a fallen Muslim American soldier as well as members of the GOP’s top brass, reports of chaos and frustration within both Trump’s campaign and his party, and a growing list of prominent Republicans publicly defecting to the Clinton camp.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/post-convention-clinton-surges-polls-000000651.html?nhp=1

I just found someone else who shares my opinion about her rise in the polls.
 
You were down on the Dem convention the whole time. You thought it was some sort of disaster, and that it was all about the "boos" (which very few heard after the 1st day).

It's hilarious you're trying to downplay it now. If it's a big "win" for you that Hillary's huge jump in the polls is all about Khan, have at it. Either way, the race is over, unless there is some October surprise.

But this is a convention bump. That was one of the better conventions I've ever seen. The Dems have a lot of very good orators.
 
Thing1 said:
You were down on the Dem convention the whole time. You thought it was some sort of disaster, and that it was all about the "boos" (which very few heard after the 1st day).

It's hilarious you're trying to downplay it now. If it's a big "win" for you that Hillary's huge jump in the polls is all about Khan, have at it. Either way, the race is over, unless there is some October surprise.

But this is a convention bump. That was one of the better conventions I've ever seen. The Dems have a lot of very good orators.
Click to expand...

How am I wrong about the boos and the chair of the DNC party resigning over corruption? That was a disaster for the Dems. But like most loyal Dems, you did your best to pretend it was no big deal and then went on a love fest about how great the rest of the convention was. You still think it was great despite that huge controversy. Has that ever happened before? I don't think so.

As to the bump, I've said it is my opinion and I'm not the only who thinks her "bump" wasn't so much due to the convention, but Trump acting like a retard. You're entitled to your belief, but one thing is crystal clear, you are completely biased.
 
Seahawk said:
How am I wrong about the boos and the chair of the DNC party resigning over corruption? That was a disaster for the Dems. But like most loyal Dems, you did your best to pretend it was no big deal and then went on a love fest about how great the rest of the convention was. You still think it was great despite that huge controversy. Has that ever happened before? I don't think so.

As to the bump, I've said it is my opinion and I'm not the only who thinks her "bump" wasn't so much due to the convention, but Trump acting like a retard. You're entitled to your belief, but one thing is crystal clear, you are completely biased.
Click to expand...

Sure thing. It's not biased to think the Dem convention was a success. It was, clearly.

It's biased to try to deny that. I'm not the one doing that.
 
Thing1 said:
Sure thing. It's not biased to think the Dem convention was a success. It was, clearly.

It's biased to try to deny that. I'm not the one doing that.
Click to expand...

So the whole booing and corruption resulting in the chair resigning, meh, no big deal. Yeah, you're not partisan.
 
Seahawk said:
So the whole booing and corruption resulting in the chair resigning, meh, no big deal. Yeah, you're not partisan.
Click to expand...

Do you think it was a big deal in the media? Do you think it affected the polls one iota?

You keep focusing on what I think. I'm objective on that, because I see the impact for what it was. Nil.
 
Seahawk said:
She is almost right back where she was preconventions. So Trump sunk her and then when it was her turn, she simply went back to where she almost was.

That is not a bump, it is at best a rebound and when viewed as a whole, she is still less than she was prior to the convention.
Click to expand...

she is where she was preconvention, but that IS her bump.....next week she will come back down and we will see where we really are......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top