Hillary Clinton broke the law

The defending of Hillary's actions on the email / server issue from any angle was once baffling to me, as to how anyone that wanted to be taken seriously otherwise would dare bother.

But as it turns out we now know that basically she could have shot someone, got in her car and ran them over, filmed the entire incident and still liberals would have somehow defended it by saying just maybe it was a body double.
I've never seen anything like this latest display of denial in the name of political affiliation.

At least as a Trump supporter I was able to admit his shortcomings but defend that they were not a threat to the business of the office for which he was seeking.
 
coolbreeze said:
The defending of Hillary's actions on the email / server issue from any angle was once baffling to me, as to how anyone that wanted to be taken seriously otherwise would dare bother.

But as it turns out we now know that basically she could have shot someone, got in her car and ran them over, filmed the entire incident and still liberals would have somehow defended it by saying just maybe it was a body double.
I've never seen anything like this latest display of denial in the name of political affiliation.

At least as a Trump supporter I was able to admit his shortcomings but defend that they were not a threat to the business of the office for which he was seeking.
Click to expand...

What is ironic and highly hypocritical is that these same liberals who defend EVERYTHING Hillary does will demand that Trump voters criticize him at every turn. Well, when they live up to their own standards I will take them seriously.
 
I Love America said:
What is ironic and highly hypocritical is that these same liberals who defend EVERYTHING Hillary does will demand that Trump voters criticize him at every turn. Well, when they live up to their own standards I will take them seriously.
Click to expand...

It's worse than that, libs accuse Trump of shit that they have no evidence of, turn it into a narrative, then comment on the narrative. Listen to NPR once in a while- it's exactly how several JPP libs operate.
 
I Love America said:
Here is a fact for you to chew on and respond to.



Now I am sure that people will hang their collective hats on the fact that the FBI didn't prosecute as if that completely absolves the act.

So I ask the question, does a lack of prosecution mean that Clinton, Abedin and Weiner acted appropriately and legally?
Click to expand...

No prosecution = NO CRIME!

I know you oh so desperately wish it were otherwise, but thems the facts.

:rofl2:
 
I Love America said:
I just want one of them to explain how it isn't a crime for classified information being on the laptop of a pedophile without clearance to receive said classified information.

I mean usually, the crowd of Thingy, GayRod and Zipperhead are at the head of the pack in defending Her Thighness. I double checked and I don't have any thread bans in effect, so one must wonder
Click to expand...

OH, last night's radio talk show had more then it just being on his laptop.

Evidently it got there by his wife sending it to him, so he COULD THEN PRINT IT OUT FOR HER.

Don't you need a special clearance level to print out CLASSIFIED INFORMATION and isn't there a protocol for how it's to then be handled? :dunno:
 
Right said:
Comey said it was a crime, but he would not prosecute Clinton because he could not prove intent. No, this isn't a logical stand, but that was his stand nevertheless.
Click to expand...

Isn't there a sailor in prison right now for talking a selfie of himself on a submarine and behind, on the picture, was a classified piece of equipment?
I don't think they needed "INTENT" to prosecute him.
 
coolbreeze said:
Hillary and her pervert husband should have both been in jail long ago.
Now they are both old, ragged and very inconsequential, to anything really.

So let them get old in peace. Consider it an olive branch to cupcakes everywhere
Click to expand...

FUCK THAT

Once she admits to her crimes, all of them, then we can talk about a suspended sentence.

:evilnod:
 
coolbreeze said:
Hillary and her pervert husband should have both been in jail long ago.
Now they are both old, ragged and very inconsequential, to anything really.

So let them get old in peace. Consider it an olive branch to cupcakes everywhere
Click to expand...

Lol. Love the irony in making fun of Hillary and Bill's ages, when the doddering old fart residing at Mar-a-Lago the WH is older than both of them.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
No prosecution = NO CRIME!

I know you oh so desperately wish it were otherwise, but thems the facts.

:rofl2:
Click to expand...

He even says they found new emails but they weren't important enough to change his previous decision. In this case new didn't mean smoking gun, as cons so desperately hoped.
 
I Love America said:
They are really struggling with how to defend this. Hillary always asked Huma to print classified material out because she didn't want to handle it the right way. But of course since there is no email from Hillary to Hummer saying "I am doing this to avoid FOIA" Comey thinks there isn't intent.

Of course Comey thinks he can read Putin's mind, but he can't discern Hillary's
Click to expand...
EXCELLENT POST OF THE DAY!
 
christiefan915 said:
He even says they found new emails but they weren't important enough to change his previous decision. In this case new didn't mean smoking gun, as cons so desperately hoped.
Click to expand...
No smoking gun needed, already in plain site .
There is no way of getting around this: According to Director James Comey (disclosure: a former colleague and longtime friend of mine), Hillary Clinton checked every box required for a felony violation of Section 793(f) of the federal penal code (Title 18)

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/437479/fbi-rewrites-federal-law-let-hillary-hook
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/437479/fbi-rewrites-federal-law-let-hillary-hook
Click to expand...
 
Sailor said:
If she is not charged with anything though, it is all really just window dressing.
Click to expand...
Sure, we all know that. Same with this Russia collusion 'investigation' except less so. Dims can't even speculate on a potential crime committed. Their window dressing is cardboard and aluminum foil with the russian thing.

Hillary on the other hand has been committing crimes (or skirting the law) since her one time, miraculous cattle futures 'investment', and it's in plain sight. Not enough honest people care. Because she's a high profile politician who's been running for president since '92 nobody's going to prosecute her like they would any other private citizen else it reeks of political retribution- and she knows that.
I'm no big fan of Trump, but for all his faults he doesn't compare to hrc in regard to criminal activity.
I'm certainly no fan of hrc but I'll give her this: she's a smart and wily criminal that seems to have a great instinct for knowing just how far she can go without getting indicted.
 
christiefan915 said:
Lol. Love the irony in making fun of Hillary and Bill's ages, when the doddering old fart residing at Mar-a-Lago the WH is older than both of them.
Click to expand...

EZ mistake, as Trump looks younger. All the lying the Clintons have done leads to a stressful existence. lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top