HIgh Schools now banning MAGA hats!!!!

The murderous hatred of right-wingers here is really a spectacle to behold. Are your lives really that terrible that you carry that around, ready to burst out with the slightest provocation? I feel for you. Get help.

List the liberals who were murdered by "right-wingers."
 
Nearly every black person ever to run had more political experience and a more presidential temperament than Trump, as well as a stronger command of policy questions.

Your opinions aren't facts, are they?

Yet, before Obama, not one of them did very well in an election. And, yes, that includes some who were highly qualified.

Says who? Apparently the voters didn't think so. Are you laboring under the impression that skin color is a virtue that deserves to be rewarded?

For example, consider Carol Moseley Braun. She'd been a state-level politician for many years, then a US senator, then an ambassador to multiple countries. Even with the relatively less bigoted challenge of a Democratic primary, she barely even made a ripple.

I'd ask you to consider that holding multiple political positions may not be a qualification for being POTUS.

BTW, didn't she turn out to be an campaign crook and a deadbeat? Maybe the DEMOCRATS knew her better than you do,

I don't think you have any basis for making the claim that a DEMOCRAT primary is less bigoted than any other party's primary, do you?
 
No. At this point either you've gone back and reread and realized your error, or you've concluded you're probably wrong so you won't go back and check. Either way, I've put you in your place again, and that's nice.

No, you lied and aren't willing to accept the truth.

You don't have ability to put anyone in any place figuratively or literally. Any time you want to try, jump.
 
Nobody knows how anyone voted, because we have a secret ballot.

Yes, and we also have exit polls.

The funny thing is the two-faced approach to the question by right-wing schmucks. When they're trying to push the idea that black people are racists by way of high voter turnout among blacks when Obama ran, then they're implicitly leaning on exit-poll data that established high black turnout in those years. Then, when a much smarter poster points out that the same polls show that black turnout was simply continuing to rise at the same pace as it did in 2000 and 2004, suddenly we're supposed to reject those surveys. And then the wingnuts wonder why intelligent people laugh at them.
 
Last edited:
Judging by demographics, about half the victims of 9/11 would qualify. Religious conservatives tend to be a particularly violent variety of right-winger.

I'm sure you have proof of this, so lets see it.
 
Your opinions aren't facts, are they?

These opinions are backed up by the facts, as you know.

Says who?

Common sense. You'll have to take my word on that, for obvious reasons.

I'd ask you to consider that holding multiple political positions may not be a qualification for being POTUS.

Prior relevant experience is something that matters in any high-skill job. There's a reason that Trump is listed by presidential historians as the worst president in our history, and part of it is that he showed up with absolutely no idea what he was doing.

BTW, didn't she turn out to be an campaign crook and a deadbeat?

No.

I don't think you have any basis for making the claim that a DEMOCRAT primary is less bigoted than any other party's primary, do you?

Yes, I have very strong reason for doing so. Democratic primary voters have an actual track record of selecting women over men (both times Clinton got more popular votes), racial minorities over whites (Obama ), and even outside those examples have had multiple runs by various members of minority groups who were at least somewhat competitive (e.g., Jesse Jackson, Bernie Sanders). On the Republican side, by comparison, not only has every single winner ever been a white, male, Christian, but so have all the runners-up, and, as far as I can recall, all the third-stringers, too. Take 2016 as an example. The top four spots were all taken by white male Christians. The top-performing candidate who didn't meet that description got 0.3% of the delegates.

If it were just one primary, we could write that off as a meaningless coincidence. But 2012 was the same way. 2008, too. And 2000. And 1996. And 1992. And so on. Women and minorities in Republican presidential nomination races tend to wind up with support approximating a rounding error, like Herman Cain or Michele Bachman. That's not a coincidence. It's because a huge portion of the Republican electorate consists of bigots who won't even consider a candidate that isn't a white, male Christian.
 
Why should they incite violence? I thought you leftists were opposed to violence. I guess not...

I didn't say they should, I said it could easily happen.
You should have known this since I said in the same post that I don't agree with Antifa methods.
 
I'm sure you have proof of this, so lets see it.

Sure. Have you seen the election numbers for New York City? If so, then you're already aware that people in the New York area are disproportionately likely to vote for more liberal politicians.
 
These opinions are backed up by the facts, as you know. Common sense. You'll have to take my word on that, for obvious reasons. Prior relevant experience is something that matters in any high-skill job. Women and minorities in Republican presidential nomination races tend to wind up with support approximating a rounding error, like Herman Cain or Michele Bachman. That's not a coincidence. It's because a huge portion of the Republican electorate consists of bigots who won't even consider a candidate that isn't a white, male Christian.

All subjective opinion. Did you ever consider that primary voters might not be motivated by racism and/or sexism?
 
Sure. Have you seen the election numbers for New York City? If so, then you're already aware that people in the New York area are disproportionately likely to vote for more liberal politicians.

He asked for proof of your previous claim, not more claims unsupported by any verifiable evidence.
 
The mindset of those on the left seems to be it's OK to BE violent as long as you THINK that the other person is thinking about it.

It does seem that's their excuse. Then there are the uncorroborated claims that they don't condone violence. I don't find them credible. Do you?
 
. Did you ever consider that primary voters might not be motivated by racism and/or sexism?

Yes. And then I tested that against the data. Turns out Republican primary voters, especially, are strongly motivated by racism and sexism, to the point that nobody who wasn't a white man has EVER been remotely competitive in a Republican presidential primary.
 
Back
Top