"Heavily armed man sparked a panic at a supermarket"

[SmarterthanYou]

These are the types of debates the Russo bot holes use

We have to accept for real the warnings our own American defenders like the FBI has been repeatedly told us as a nation

There are Russian computer programs being used to divide this great nation for the benefits of foreign opponents

It’s real folks

Everywhere on the internets

Including here

you sold me........everyone should start seeing a mental health expert, especially you.

 

[volsrock]

"Rico Marley was arrested as he emerged from the bathroom at a Publix supermarket in Atlanta. He was wearing body armor and carrying six loaded weapons – four handguns in his jacket pockets, and in a guitar bag, a semi-automatic rifle and a 12-gauge shotgun."

"Moments earlier, an Instacart delivery driver had alerted a store employee after seeing Marley in the bathroom, along with the AR-15-style rifle, which was propped against a wall."

"Clearly, visiting the grocery store with a trove of guns had frightened people?"

"In states with permissive gun laws, the police and prosecutors have limited tools at their disposal when a heavily armed individual's mere presence in a public space sows fear or even panic."

"Events such as the one involving Marley are examples of a problem already bedeviling police and prosecutors, sometimes from the moment an armed person is spotted in public. Police officers sometimes had mere seconds to determine whether a person with a gun either legally has the right or he's a madman – or both.

"For the average cop walking the street in America, it's a huge dilemma, knowing there have been countless active-shooter situations"

"Marley was released"

https://buffalonews.com/a-heavily-a...cle_d576ceaf-80d6-5a50-b62b-5015833a1d72.html

Only a matter of time before gun enthusiasts will be testing what few gun laws remain with similar type actions, welcome to MAGA America, where stopping on the way home to get a quart of milk takes on a whole new meaning

Do u live in Atlanta....why do u care

If so move to NK or China

 

[Nordberg]

you sold me........everyone should start seeing a mental health expert, especially you.

Warren Burger did it and you turned away.

 

[Street Glider]

Fuck you straight to hell shit bag

Your ideas of ”manly” are from a micro penis incel’s mind

Waving your penis replacement, deadly, created out of insane ideas of manhood isn’t doing the people around you much good

Your fixation on the size of another man's genitalia has been noted.

Is liking cock a new thing for you?

Thanks for proving you are too insane to process the proper use of a DEADLY WEAPON!

I probably know more about it than most, dipshit...

 

[Nordberg]

THIS is the exact reason why the framers denied the government any power over the arms of the people. It's so statists can't implement disarmament by claiming anyone wanting to own a gun is too nuts to own a gun.

The founders did not do that. If you are a member of a regulated militia that is designed to defend the state, then you are allowed a gun.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

That is not the, prior to Heller in 2008, no Supreme Court ever in the history of the country ever ruled in favor of the gun advocates version of the Second Amendment

so? lower federal courts, as well as state courts, have ruled that the individual right is clear and valid. If it were truly NOT a right as you claim, it would have been easy for the Supreme Court to decide so, but they did not. In fact, several Supreme Court opinions in other cases that do not concern the 2nd Amendment have referenced the right to bear arms as an individual right..........

and the Heller decision was pure Scalia, even he admitted he could not get beyond the prefatory clause but ignored anyways.

The 'prefatory' clause is irrelevant.......it states the reason that the individual right of the people to keep and bear their own private arms.

As far as the Founding Fathers, the gun advocate groups puts out lists of quotes from the Founders supposedly supporting gun ownership, but as I said, taking a simple quote or two from a speech or article by individuals who wrote endlessly throughout their lives is pulling it out of context. You won’t see those quotes in Scalia’s opinion, nor in Thomas’s sophomoric interpretation of history

then, by all means, post ONLY founding father quotes that specifically say that ONLY government regulated military units have the right to keep and bear arms............we'll wait.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

The founders did not do that. If you are a member of a regulated militia that is designed to defend the state, then you are allowed a gun.

wrong. it's the right of the people, not the right of a well regulated militia.

what is the well regulated militia?

 

[archives]

now look who is taking things out of context...........or at the very least, not providing context.

why is it that in all of the anti gun posturing, nobody wants SPECIFICS on who is doing the shooting but instead chooses to lump all of humanity in to the same group..........but any other topic, some people see the need to break things down in to race, gender, age, and economic status????????

let's be consistent about it, ok?

do you live in such a small town that you know EVERYONE??????? or do you see strangers in the store with you, but you just don't bother considering if they are armed or not?

Since nearly every state allows some form of carry, even Hawaii now, but only one person so far, If I can ask.....what state do you live in that nobody carries?

Not that it matters, but what difference does it make, they are all shooters, all American citizens, all with access to guns

I live in a city, city surrounded by suburbs, and I, nor all those people I mentioned, go thru life worrying some person next to them anywhere is carrying a gun, nor that they represent a threat for some reason.

And as far as carrying, yes the State permits carry, however, you have to show cause as to why you feel the need to carry, obtain a license to carry, and just feeling threatened someone else may have a gun won’t do it

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Not that it matters, but what difference does it make, they are all shooters, all American citizens, all with access to guns

which is exactly the reason why YOU should be carrying one. It's like a fire extinguisher. It's better to have it and never need it, than it is to need it and not have it.

I live in a city, city surrounded by suburbs, and I, nor all those people I mentioned, go thru life worrying some person next to them anywhere is carrying a gun, nor that they represent a threat for some reason.

ignorance is bliss, they say

And as far as carrying, yes the State permits carry, however, you have to show cause as to why you feel the need to carry, obtain a license to carry, and just feeling threatened someone else may have a gun won’t do it

so the state, as well as you, consider human lives unimportant............so then why are you worried about people and guns?

 

[archives]

so? lower federal courts, as well as state courts, have ruled that the individual right is clear and valid. If it were truly NOT a right as you claim, it would have been easy for the Supreme Court to decide so, but they did not. In fact, several Supreme Court opinions in other cases that do not concern the 2nd Amendment have referenced the right to bear arms as an individual right..........


The 'prefatory' clause is irrelevant.......it states the reason that the individual right of the people to keep and bear their own private arms.



then, by all means, post ONLY founding father quotes that specifically say that ONLY government regulated military units have the right to keep and bear arms............we'll wait.

So have many more State and lower Courts ruled the opposite prior to Heller, in fact, over two hundred plus years of Courts ruling to the contrary. And every SCOTUS up to Scalia did

Goes beyond reason, any prefatory clause gives meaning to what is to follow, the operative clause, it is never irrelevant. When the kid’s father says to him if you clean the garage I will give you five dollars it doesn’t mean the father is just going to hand over five dollars to the kid

All ready done it numerous times, not backtracking again, read Hamilton or Adams, even Madison in the Federalist papers, none of them felt blankely that the purpose of the Amendment was to give people guns

 

[archives]

which is exactly the reason why YOU should be carrying one. It's like a fire extinguisher. It's better to have it and never need it, than it is to need it and not have it.


ignorance is bliss, they say


so the state, as well as you, consider human lives unimportant............so then why are you worried about people and guns?

No, life is too short to be going around thinking every person next to me everywhere wants to shoot me

Can’t be that bliss, where I live has much lower gun violence than where you live, and all kinds of people live here

Quite the opposite, they are concerned about life, which is why they have strict gun laws, and the results are in the gun violence statistics, it is a safer State

 

[evince]

you sold me........everyone should start seeing a mental health expert, especially you.

Not a thing wrong with it idiot


That is how people keep mentally healthy


Check ups idiot



You dont understand how healthcare works huh?

 

[evince]

which is exactly the reason why YOU should be carrying one. It's like a fire extinguisher. It's better to have it and never need it, than it is to need it and not have it.


ignorance is bliss, they say


so the state, as well as you, consider human lives unimportant............so then why are you worried about people and guns?

Dear fucking idiot,


All the documented evidence says it’s the states with high access to guns that have high murder rates



Fuck you very much

 

[SmarterthanYou]

So have many more State and lower Courts ruled the opposite prior to Heller, in fact, over two hundred plus years of Courts ruling to the contrary. And every SCOTUS up to Scalia did

The Supreme Court, and yes, it is a valid COURT decision now, has cleared up at least that part of the BS confusion/idiocy over it.

Goes beyond reason, any prefatory clause gives meaning to what is to follow, the operative clause, it is never irrelevant. When the kid’s father says to him if you clean the garage I will give you five dollars it doesn’t mean the father is just going to hand over five dollars to the kid

All ready done it numerous times, not backtracking again, read Hamilton or Adams, even Madison in the Federalist papers, none of them felt blankely that the purpose of the Amendment was to give people guns

it doesn't GIVE people guns, it denies the new federal government from infringing on their right to guns...........Now all you have to do is show that the framers ONLY intended for government regulated military units to have guns........again, we'll wait.

and the whole 'done it numerous times', doesn't seem to stop you from wanting me to repost all of my claims................so put up or shut up.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

No, life is too short to be going around thinking every person next to me everywhere wants to shoot me

Can’t be that bliss, where I live has much lower gun violence than where you live, and all kinds of people live here

thinking every person next to me wants to shoot me is a BS assumption/generalization. we all know how that goes.

Quite the opposite, they are concerned about life, which is why they have strict gun laws, and the results are in the gun violence statistics, it is a safer State

again, avoiding the details and specifics of the violence............is that where you're going to plant your flag? since you didn't mention what state you live in, i'm not going to claim whether it is or isn't or what the actual reasons may be.

But it is ludicrous to claim that government and people like you are concerned about life while preventing most others from being able to defend it from people who want to take it, or abuse it.

 

[Celticguy]

Not the point, but close, now we have to wait till the Rambo wannabe does something before action can be taken, don’t think most Americans want to live in a world where one has to feel uneasy just visiting their local grocery store because some idiot wants to dress like he’s on his way to Rose Creek

Simple solution: conceal carry and the playing field is levelled !

 

[volsrock]

So your saying someone visibly armed to the teeth doesn’t present any concerns to people at the local grocery store, can’t wait to see how it plays out when the guy dressed like Rambo walks into a bar at midnight. Wouldn’t want to be a police officer in your reality

Do inner city gang members go though a background check to carry?

Shouldn't the access to carry be equal?

You can bet your pussy lips that 80% inner city black males between the ages of 17 an 30 in Saint Louis is carrying ...did they get a background check?

 

[Saint Guinefort]

"Rico Marley was arrested as he emerged from the bathroom at a Publix supermarket in Atlanta. He was wearing body armor and carrying six loaded weapons – four handguns in his jacket pockets, and in a guitar bag, a semi-automatic rifle and a 12-gauge shotgun."

"Moments earlier, an Instacart delivery driver had alerted a store employee after seeing Marley in the bathroom, along with the AR-15-style rifle, which was propped against a wall."

"Clearly, visiting the grocery store with a trove of guns had frightened people?"

"In states with permissive gun laws, the police and prosecutors have limited tools at their disposal when a heavily armed individual's mere presence in a public space sows fear or even panic."

"Events such as the one involving Marley are examples of a problem already bedeviling police and prosecutors, sometimes from the moment an armed person is spotted in public. Police officers sometimes had mere seconds to determine whether a person with a gun either legally has the right or he's a madman – or both.

"For the average cop walking the street in America, it's a huge dilemma, knowing there have been countless active-shooter situations"

"Marley was released"

https://buffalonews.com/a-heavily-a...cle_d576ceaf-80d6-5a50-b62b-5015833a1d72.html

Only a matter of time before gun enthusiasts will be testing what few gun laws remain with similar type actions, welcome to MAGA America, where stopping on the way home to get a quart of milk takes on a whole new meaning

I am curious when a card-carrying open-carry permit holder in an open-carry state walks into a store commits a mass shooting. I think it is actually a testimony to the general law-abiding nature of gun owners of the country of which there are apparently quite a few, that there haven't been more of this type. But I suspect in part it is because there simply hasn't been open carry for long enough across the country to capture the fraction of the "mass murder demographic" who also get a permit for open carry.

 

[Lionfish]

I am curious when a card-carrying open-carry permit holder in an open-carry state walks into a store commits a mass shooting. I think it is actually a testimony to the general law-abiding nature of gun owners of the country of which there are apparently quite a few, that there haven't been more of this type. But I suspect in part it is because there simply hasn't been open carry for long enough across the country to capture the fraction of the "mass murder demographic" who also get a permit for open carry.

Karen, in many places, open carry has been legal since this country was founded.

 

[Saint Guinefort]

Karen, in many places, open carry has been legal since this country was founded.

Please leave me alone. I actually had a point there to make and you clearly didn't even read the whole sentence, so your input is really not needed,wanted, or to be quite honest "taken seriously".

Thanks.