zappasguitar
Well-known member
And there it was...TWELVE WHOLE POSTS into the debate thread HE created...Yurtsie spews the now familiar profanity his every post contains and runs like the coward we all knew he was.
Last edited:
LOL? ? Nah, not really.
How about you formulate an opinion and then share it!
Or you can fail at humor for a few posts and then try again.
You don't debate by handing your opponent a newspaper article and then expecting them to refute the author.
Starting to get it yet?
Actually you can if there was no rule specifying that it couldn't be done prior to the debate start...
Actually you can if there was no rule specifying that it couldn't be done prior to the debate start...
And there it was...TWELVE WHOLE POSTS into the debate thread HE created...Yurtsie spews the now familiar profanity his every post contains and runs like the coward we all knew he was.
lol...so a head to head debate, according to zappa, means you use someone to debate for you
thats funny!
I have given many opinions. Go find them yourself, I'm not your mommy.
We are still waiting for something of substance from you Yurt. So far all you've done is sit in the peanut gallery and throw peanuts and whine.
It can mean just that if you do not specify beforehand what exactly the rules are...
...which you did not do btw.
so a one on one debate is not really a one on one, its a one and whomever else the person uses to debate for him
LOL
zappa thinks a head to head debate is actually a link contest where neither side actually has to debate their position, rather, than can simply use other people's thoughts as their own
![]()
Is that what I think??
Actually...
...It can be if the rules specify.
For instance...
You plagiarized the documentary "Grass" for your debate about legalization of marijuana, so your debate wasn't one on one...it was you and the writers of that documentary vs. your opponent.
But since the rules didn't say you COULDN'T utilize material and info from other sources, people let it slide.
Why can't you admit you rushed into this and didn't properly establish the ground rules in your haste to belittle Bfrgn?
I didn't claim you had plagiarized anything...
And its the liberal assholes that created the problem...Personal? You are focusing on the wrong word...it is RESPONSIBILITY.
It IS MY business if you don't have health insurance and get hit by a semi, have a heart attack or your appendix bursts...you WILL get treatment, and there WILL be a bill. If you can't pay it, everyone else who has insurance PAYS YOUR bill. It adds over $1,000 per year to everyone's policy premium.
Thats exactly the way you pinheads demanded it be...now you got it and whine about it....why did you demand it in the first place..
You are the poster boy for personal IRresponsibility... a health care welfare queen...
And its the liberal assholes that created the problem...
Who was responsible for doctors bills 50 years ago?
Was it your neighbor that paid YOUR bill....?
If I can't pay for the treatment, I shouldn't be getting the treatment..same as any other commodity....I can't afford a Porsche and I don't expect you to buy me one....why the hell should you expect me to buy you a heart transplant....
If you liberals insist on taking care of everyone in the world, then pay for it yourselves, or don't insist....
lol, so you actually haven't debated??...i threw out the debate topic, i'm waiting to respond to your opening statement....if you can show me where you gave it, i'll gladly respond.
perhaps if you stopped whining, we could get on with this....
Yurt, what I have posted compared to you would be War & Peace and the 26 volumes of the Warren Report vs. your blank piece of paper.
I already said that I don't know if it is constitutional. Anyone who says they know for sure is a liar. I speculate based on previous cases, Justices Scalia and Roberts may disappoint all the folks on the right who are now staunch advocates for personal irresponsibility...health care welfare queens.
Let's hear from you Yurt...time to end all your obfuscation and stalling.
Trying. But it take more than 1 to debate somethingIs anyone actually debating on this thread?
Trying. But it take more than 1 to debate something
And its the liberal assholes that created the problem...
Who was responsible for doctors bills 50 years ago?
Was it your neighbor that paid YOUR bill....?
If I can't pay for the treatment, I shouldn't be getting the treatment..same as any other commodity....I can't afford a Porsche and I don't expect you to buy me one....why the hell should you expect me to buy you a heart transplant....
If you liberals insist on taking care of everyone in the world, then pay for it yourselves, or don't insist....