Harry, cows, and law breakers

indeed harry, it's not over. the response will be more severe from us next time.


That's right...I was just reading one big, BRAVE Tea Bagger's BRILLIANT idea!

He thinks if the Feds try anything, that Rancher Bundy and his militia buddies should put WOMEN on the front lines and let them die first!

Cowards...that's what these "patriots" are.

Cowards with guns who want to hide behind their women.
 
I think citizens taking up arms against the government for ridiculous, imagined threats, is a direct threat to my lifestyle and well being and I support the government's reigning in these domestic terrorists.
with all of the incidents you've seen my discuss or start threads on, do you believe that ANY of them are cause for using arms against those particular agents of the government?

Do you feel Timothy McVeigh was justified in his bombing of government property and employees?
yes. I simply disapprove of his target.
 
That's right...I was just reading one big, BRAVE Tea Bagger's BRILLIANT idea!

He thinks if the Feds try anything, that Rancher Bundy and his militia buddies should put WOMEN on the front lines and let them die first!

Cowards...that's what these "patriots" are.

Cowards with guns who want to hide behind their women.

you were dismissed earlier because of your own cowardice. go be a coward behind the badge and gun.
 
with all of the incidents you've seen my discuss or start threads on, do you believe that ANY of them are cause for using arms against those particular agents of the government?


yes. I simply disapprove of his target.

Who should have been the target?
 
ATF, FBI, anywhere without children. if he'd been more determined, he could have gone after Reno herself.

So, you support killing people just because their interpretation of the Constitution is different from yours, tell me, how are you any different from a Muslim terrorist?
 
you were dismissed earlier because of your own cowardice. go be a coward behind the badge and gun.

I understand your need to get rid of me as fast as possible.

No blustering coward wants someone hanging around reminding everyone how you are all show and no go, and how you advocate putting your women in front of you to use as a shield when the shooting starts.
 
So, you support killing people just because their interpretation of the Constitution is different from yours, tell me, how are you any different from a Muslim terrorist?

if you cannot see the difference in how I post about my constitutional beliefs, then you're just too blinded by your own partisan hackery.
 
if you cannot see the difference in how I post about my constitutional beliefs, then you're just too blinded by your own partisan hackery.

Which party would that be?

Basically, you are the same as a Muslim terrorists in that you kill people to advance your cause because your beliefs are not popular enough to be accepted by the majority.
 
Farmer Bundy is a sworn enemy of the United States of America. He is, by his own words, a "sovereign citizen". Constitutionally speaking, there is no such thing as any "sovereign citizen" but I don't suspect he has much understanding of the Constitution or the oxymoronic nature of his claimed citizenship status. Laughable at the very best.

Laughing at ignorance is always best for all involved!!!!!!!!
 
So, you support killing people just because their interpretation of the Constitution is different from yours, tell me, how are you any different from a Muslim terrorist?

There's a practical limit to interpretation. You can't honestly say "well no matter their actions, it's just how they read the Constitution", especially when the avenues for non-violent resistence are being removed daily.
 
Soooooooooo,,,,,,,,you support murdering of your fellow citizens in order to resolve your grievances with your ignorant-assed interpretation of the Constitution? Heads up, NSA!!!!!!!

Laughing at ignorance is always best for all involved!!!!!!
 
There's a practical limit to interpretation. You can't honestly say "well no matter their actions, it's just how they read the Constitution", especially when the avenues for non-violent resistence are being removed daily.

So, is it to the point where you are willing to take up arms in resistance and in the same manner as STY suggested?

I personally think that is irrational thinking. Our government has not reached the point where I feel that I need to point a gun at federal agents.
 
So, is it to the point where you are willing to take up arms in resistance and in the same manner as STY suggested?

I personally think that is irrational thinking. Our government has not reached the point where I feel that I need to point a gun at federal agents.

You're trying to tie a rebellion to a refusal to allow an unjust act to occur. They are not the same thing. Any time a federal agent threatens me unjustly is the time I will respond in kind. But on a bigger picture? We're at the tipping point. Where we go from here, while I can certainly guess, we don't actually know yet.

You'd also do well to note that in this instance no blood was shed and thus far has been peacefully resolved. Would that be the case had Bundy been left alone by his fellow freedom fighters?
 
Soooooooooo,,,,,,,,you support murdering of your fellow citizens in order to resolve your grievances with your ignorant-assed interpretation of the Constitution? Heads up, NSA!!!!!!!

Laughing at ignorance is always best for all involved!!!!!!

To whom, pray tell, are you talking?
 
You and just what unjust act are you talking about? The enforcement of law or the terrorists that prefer to deny the law? Idiot.

Laughing at ignorance is always the best for all involved!!!!!!
 
You and just what unjust act are you talking about? The enforcement of law or the terrorists that prefer to deny the law? Idiot.

Laughing at ignorance is always the best for all involved!!!!!!

Again, to whom are you speaking? I wouldn't have to ask if you'd use the quote feature.
 
Back
Top