Harry, cows, and law breakers

NOVA

U. S. NAVY Veteran
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid hasn't been very vocal about the cattle battle showdown in recent days, but says "it's not over."

Reid tells News4's Samantha Boatman his take on the so-called cattle battle in southern Las Vegas. "Well, it's not over. We can't have an American people that violate the law and then just walk away from it. So it's not over," Reid said.

http://tinyurl.com/mr7mjsv

It obvious just what side Harry in on...

someone ought to introduce him to Obama, Hillary Clinton, Eric Holder, Kathleen Sebelius, Lois Lerner , James Clapper and a host of others in
the administration that routinely break the law.
 
147179_600.jpg


:rofl2:
 
The thing I don't understand about the Bundy supporters, if they don't acknowledge the USA government, why do they display the stars and stripes? It baffles me.


They fancy themselves the true Patriots and would be fiercely loyal to a proper United States government, it's just that the government in power now ain't.
 
i'm sure that they are, if they are monitoring my facebook page unconstitutionally.

If you made it public, it isn't unconstitutionally. If you have it set to private, then it is, unless they view you as a domestic terrorist whose activities need to be monitored. HLS could have gotten a warrant because of your statements on this forum.
 
If you made it public, it isn't unconstitutionally. If you have it set to private, then it is, unless they view you as a domestic terrorist whose activities need to be monitored. HLS could have gotten a warrant because of your statements on this forum.

i'm amused at the pro DHS and police statists when they view American citizens as threats, as compared to the unconstitutional treatement of non american citizens declared 'enemy combatants'. depending upon who's president that is.
 
i'm amused at the pro DHS and police statists when they view American citizens as threats, as compared to the unconstitutional treatement of non american citizens declared 'enemy combatants'. depending upon who's president that is.

All domestic terrorists will be given trials to determine guilt. The prisoners of GITMO are held without trials.

When surveilence is done according to the letter of the law, I have no problem with it. It is just when it is done illegally that I have issues.
 
All domestic terrorists will be given trials to determine guilt. The prisoners of GITMO are held without trials.

When surveilence is done according to the letter of the law, I have no problem with it. It is just when it is done illegally that I have issues.

are you then able to discern what are direct threats to someone or something in particular, or just generalized statements of potential violence in response to certain actions that you take offense to?
 
are you then able to discern what are direct threats to someone or something in particular, or just generalized statements of potential violence in response to certain actions that you take offense to?


I think citizens taking up arms against the government for ridiculous, imagined threats, is a direct threat to my lifestyle and well being and I support the government's reigning in these domestic terrorists.

Do you feel Timothy McVeigh was justified in his bombing of government property and employees?
 
Back
Top