Gun Monkey Follies

[ULTRA MAGA]

Hey gumby, wailing "gun grabbber" proves nothing. You have to FACTUALLY and LOGICALLY make your case. Let us know when you do.

Let us know when you develop a logic tree so we can begin.

 

[Matt Dillon]

You fucking dipshit. The very first headline is false. The armalite rifle was never designed for military use. It's a ruger mini 14 with a scary looking stock that makes you piss your pants like a bitch. Call me a gun monkey if it makes you feel brave, then come and take mine personally soy boy. Tired of your fucking air.

An “assault weapon” refers to a semi-automatic firearm originally designed for military use. Assault weapons are uniquely lethal because of features including their rapid rate of fire and high muzzle velocity.​

Mini-14s are kinda ass.
The concept is great, M1-style action even, but a lot of 'em just don't get it.
You can get an M1 and a 20-30-round mag.
Or..a PCC.
M1 Carbines are better than Mini-14s.
I'd put them at SKS-level.
Not BAR in .308 level. POS Mauser level.

Ruger 9mm carbine, that's not bad, comparable price, most likely much more accurate, and the ammo is cheaper.
Idk what the fuck up is with Mini-14s, but it ain't good.

 

[Matt Dillon]

Your proud ignorance never ceases to amaze. For your education:

https://wooxstore.com/blogs/woox-journal/ar-15-rifle-history

Assault weapon | Military History and Science | Research Starters | EBSCO Research

<p>An assault weapon is a term used in the United States to describe certain semiautomatic firearms equipped with features like a detachable magazine and a pistol grip. Unlike assault rifles, which are fully automatic and can fire multiple rounds with a single trigger pull, assault weapons fire...

www.ebsco.com

Clinton cooked some bullshit up and got away with it, but shouldn't have, dork.
The thing back in them days was SKSs, with steel-cased ammo.
$200-$250 and you could have a gun and mags and ammo and all kinds of swag.
I could never get into it.
I like my bullets with brass casings, and big and American.
Belgian rifles.
SKSs fire just about every bit like a Kalashnikov.
The Democrat goober that shot up the Congressional baseball game had an SKS and probably aftermarket mag conversions too.
Remember him, dickweed?

GOP senator recalls 'burst of gunfire' at Virginia baseball field: 'People were dropping'

A routine early-morning baseball practice among Republican members of Congress today quickly turned into a terrifying scene as gunshots rang out at the field.

abcnews.com

 

[FastLane]

Now you had an ex-con on parole cutting loose with an assault weapon in Cambridge, MA. Fortunately only 2 people were injured, no fatalities. The perp was taken down by police fire, and is hospitalized... to stand trial when he's able.

The immediate question comes to mind ... how the hell does an ex-con on parole gets his hands on an assault weapon AND back up piece? Was that weapon formerly on the 1994 AWB list? Would a universal background check and registration of ALL weapons sales have prevented this?

More laws would not have prevented it. He was already in violation of the law when an ex con had an illegal weapon.

 

[Into the Night]

Reality Check​

There is no such thing, Zombie.

That statement is false.While the exact number is hard to quantify, multiple mass shootings have involved firearms obtained through private sales or gun shows, where background checks were not required under federal law.

Lie. Synthesis.

With one exception, the weapons used in mass shootings were stolen.
That one exception is the Las Vegas shooter, who obtained his weapons through purchase at a gun store. He also passed the background check.

Key facts​

Go learn what 'fact' means, Zombie. While you're at it, go learn what 'reality' means as well.

• Gun show loophole: Federal law does not require background checks for private sellers at gun shows. This gap has been documented by the ATF and Congressional Research Service.

The ATF doesn't even know how to load a gun. Argument from randU fallacy. The ATF itself is unconstitutional in it's attempts to ban and limit guns.

• Examples contradicting the claim:
  • 1999 Columbine High School shooting: Two of the four guns used were purchased at a gun show through private sellers without background checks.

Nope. All the guns were stolen.

• 2019 Odessa, Texas shooting: The shooter obtained his rifle via a private sale that bypassed a background check.

So? The seller was also convicted of selling guns without a license to sell guns. In other words, the shooter obtained the gun from another criminal.

Other cases: ATF investigations have linked firearms used in crimes to gun show transactions, though not all qualify as “mass shootings.”

Zero. Lie. Synthesis. Stop making shit up, Zombie.

So “ZERO, ever” is demonstrably wrong — there have been multiple cases.
...deleted remaining AI slop...

No. Zero.

 

[Into the Night]

You're lying as usual. Paddock had illegally converted 9 of his firearms to fully automatic.

Banning such conversions is unconstitutional.

You have to give it to someone who can make 300 yard shots with a fully automatic weapon. One needs intense training to do that - special forces - or FBI training....

True. A lotta bullets, but without training, you won't spit 'em straight.

A typical long range sniper uses a simple bolt action rifle. The reason is simple: no wasted energy on cycling the mechanism as an automatic or semiautomatic would.

 

[Into the Night]

And for every one they're convicted of you can bet your ass they committed at least 10 more. So when they whine about being innocent on the third strike you can be certain it's bullshit.



And execute them in the public square with tickets to blow parts off their bodies with "Assault weapons" like a dunk tank at the state fair.



Get medieval on their ass and make crime stop. Before you know it you'll run out of the 5% committing most of the crime and the world will be a better place.

If someone is convicted of 1st degree murder, that should be the death penalty right there. Why wait three times?

 

[Taichiliberal]

When did

What?

When was there a bill on the House floor to confiscate 400 million guns from 150 million legal gun owners?

If you can't produce the bill or even a proposal from the house representative or senator saying such, then that makes you just another gun monkey trolling lame propagandist memes.

 

[Taichiliberal]

More laws would not have prevented it. He was already in violation of the law when an ex con had an illegal weapon.

If his weapon was formally on the 1994 AWB list, then he would not have been able to purchase it if the GOP hadn't voted against renewing it.

 

[Into the Night]

When did

When was there a bill on the House floor to confiscate 400 million guns from 150 million legal gun owners?

If you can't produce the bill or even a proposal from the house representative or senator saying such, then that makes you just another gun monkey trolling lame propagandist memes.

Eric Swalwell, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, among other Democrats.

 

[Into the Night]

If his weapon was formally on the 1994 AWB list, then he would not have been able to purchase it if the GOP hadn't voted against renewing it.

The AWB list is unconstitutional.

 

[Lionfish]

When did

When was there a bill on the House floor to confiscate 400 million guns from 150 million legal gun owners?

If you can't produce the bill or even a proposal from the house representative or senator saying such, then that makes you just another gun monkey trolling lame propagandist memes.

Who said there was?

 

[Lionfish]

 

[Lionfish]

 

[Uncensored2008]

1. I asked you to copy and paste where I made a specific statement you accuse me off. Generally pointing at the OP and using a school yard reversal of my mocking of people of your mindset doesn't cut it.

You can't lie your way out of it gun grabber monkey. You made the claim that universal background checks would stop mass shootings.

2. Your opinions/accusations, generalized mis-characterizations are but a piss in the wind, as you seek to dodge the facts and subsequent questions that the OP puts forth.

A gun grabber monkey accusing others of mischaracterization is beyond the pale. You anti-civil rights thugs do nothing but fabricate and and distort.

3. Again, private sales are not regulated in a lot of states.

Nor should they be. A father selling a son Grampa's shotgun is no business of the state.

And of course as a gun grabber monkey you mischaracterize private sales, A legal private sale requires that the seller legally own the firearm for no less than 30 days and may not sell more than 3 firearms in any 30 day period.

The lie that you seeking to end civil rights tell is that "gun shows" are these massive "wink wink nod nod" dealers selling millions of machine guns like AK15's and AR-47's, which are far more deadly than nuclear bombs, to anyone who has cash.

Of course virtually no private sellers are going to pay for a booth at an actual gun show. Usually the seller isn't making more than $100 from the sale and isn't going to pop out $300 for a spot.

Save for ultra-rare, vintage firearms going for tens of thousands, virtually all the sellers are FFL holders.

Also, waiting periods an ID requirements vary.

There you are lying again. Valid government issued photo ID and the Instant Background Check are federal law - required in all 50 states. Perhaps you were thinking we meant voting - where ID is not needed because we don't care who you are as long as you vote (D)

This contributes to the "iron pipeline" of criminals using wrapons. Your final example proves my point. If the 1994 AWB was in effect, the Vegas shooter would not of had many of his weapons.

Bullshit. This "iron pipeline" is a gun grabber monkey myth propagated by the usual anti-civil rights groups. Even the link provided went back to a gun grabber group.

Just like the "gun show loophole," this is a lie you tell in your war to end civil rights.

So you can repeat your ignorant BS ad nausea, yet you cannot produce the law or proposal that pushed for mass confiscation or repeal of the 2nd Amendment. Carry on.

And you can continue lying.

But you who oppose the Bill of Rights are losing - and losing badly. We are beating you thugs back not only on the 2nd Amendment, but also your assaults on the 1st and 5th Amendments.

For instance, how is Rob Bonta's "Silence Nick Shirley" law that revokes the 1st Amendment going in California?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Hey gumby, wailing "gun grabbber" proves nothing. You have to FACTUALLY and LOGICALLY make your case. Let us know when you do.

Already done by me and half dozen others. You gun grabber monkeys post nothing but long debunked lies to try to promote your war against civil rights.

Besides, you thought it was cute to call those who support individual rights "gun monkeys."

A hypocrite on top of being a thug.

 

[ULTRA MAGA]

Mini-14s are kinda ass.
The concept is great, M1-style action even, but a lot of 'em just don't get it.
You can get an M1 and a 20-30-round mag.
Or..a PCC.
M1 Carbines are better than Mini-14s.
I'd put them at SKS-level.
Not BAR in .308 level. POS Mauser level.

Ruger 9mm carbine, that's not bad, comparable price, most likely much more accurate, and the ammo is cheaper.
Idk what the fuck up is with Mini-14s, but it ain't good.

I have a .556 and a .762 and I like both of them. They seem very reliable and the old problem of the barrel heating up and warping seems solved.

I did have an adventure with the trigger on the .762 when I first got it and decided to send it to these "experts" in Washington to have it smoothed out. They fucked it up royally and I had to fix it myself.