Grand Collusion to Bring Down Trump

anatta said:
your honesty is appreciated
Click to expand...

No problem. Hell if not someone brilliant at least next time pick Wells or or anybody who knows the joint well enough not to bump into walls or forget to sign laws. Trump is a boob newb with mental problems.
 
anatta said:
questions begin to pile up.

1. What was the FBI's relationship with the British spy who was so wired into Russian intelligence?

2. Did the FBI use the information Steele dug up to expand its own investigation of Russia-Trump "collusion"?
Did the FBI pass what Steele unearthed to the White House and the National Security Council?

3. Did the Obama administration use the information from the Steele dossier to justify unmasking the names of Trump officials that had been picked up on legitimate electronic intercepts?

++

John Podesta and DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz claimed they did not know that Perkins Coie had enlisted Fusion GPA or the British spy to dig up dirt on Trump.

Yet, when Podesta testified, the lawyer sitting beside him in the committee room was Marc Elias of Perkins Coie, who had engaged Fusion GPS and received the fruits of Steele's undercover work.
++

we have Free Beacon neocons, never-Trump Republicans, the Hillary Clinton campaign, the DNC, a British spy and comrades in Russian intelligence, and perhaps the FBI/Deep State, all working with secret money and seedy individuals to destroy a candidate they could not defeat in a free election.
Click to expand...

4. And most important. Are the allegations true or not?

BFD on the attorney, Elias. Just another diversionary tactic by you panicked Trumptards
 
domer76 said:
4. And most important. Are the allegations true or not?
Click to expand...
that's what we need to find out. It's bizarre the FBI would want to to continue paying for just "opposition research"
Equally weird is why they took the Steele dossier synopsis to POTUS Trump in a 2 page briefing.

Recall what Clapper initially said about it:

Clapper:
the IC has not made any judgment that the information in this document is reliable, and we did not rely upon it in any way for our conclusions. However, part of our obligation is to ensure that policymakers are provided with the fullest possible picture of any matters that might affect national security.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/443835/donald-trump-james-clapper-kompromat-statemen
Click to expand...

Clapper is a known 2x liar. I wouldn't tust anything he says as far as I could throw him.
A couple days ago he changed his tune:

Former DNI: Steele Dossier Not Fake, Uncorroborated Parts 'Yet to be Determined'
https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politi...not-fake-uncorroborated-parts-yet-determined/
Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said Wednesday that "fake" is not "an accurate characterization for the entirety" of the Steele dossier, and "what has not been corroborated has yet to be determined."

"I think with respect to the dossier itself, the key thing is doesn't matter who paid for it. It's what the dossier said and the extent to which it was -- it's corroborated or not. We had some concerns about it from the standpoint of its sourcing which we couldn't corroborate," he added. "But at the same time, some of the substantive content, not all of it, but some of the substantive content of the dossier, we were able to corroborate in our Intelligence Community assessment which from other sources in which we had very high confidence to it."
Click to expand...
Clapper is part of the grand collusion I mentioned earlier.
He's a lying POS who only cares about Russiaphobia, knee capping Trump, and protecting the Deep State.

Hence his crap about "it doesn't matter who paid for it." It matters greatly.

The FBI offering to pay for it means they are apt to defend it's accuracy.
By defending it, and refusing to call it out as the salacious trash it is -tells me they very well used it as a basis for the "Russian Collusion " intelligence investigation they had going on -and still do parallel to Mueller's SC.

Basically the FBI uses fake news by saying the whole thing isn't utterly fallacious to drive their anti-Trump agenda
 
anatta said:
that's what we need to find out. It's bizarre the FBI would want to to continue paying for just "opposition research"
Equally weird is why they took the Steele dossier synopsis to POTUS Trump in a 2 page briefing.

Recall what Clapper initially said about it:



Clapper is a known 2x liar. I wouldn't tust anything he says as far as I could throw him.
A couple days ago he changed his tune:


Clapper is part of the grand collusion I mentioned earlier.
He's a lying POS who only cares about Russiaphobia, knee capping Trump, and protecting the Deep State.

Hence his crap about "it doesn't matter who paid for it." It matters greatly.

The FBI offering to pay for it means they are apt to defend it's accuracy.
By defending it, and refusing to call it out as the salacious trash it is -tells me they very well used it as a basis for the "Russian Collusion " intelligence investigation they had going on -and still do parallel to Mueller's SC.

Basically the FBI uses fake news by saying the whole thing isn't utterly fallacious to drive their anti-Trump agenda
Click to expand...

I recommend anti psychotic meds as well as a nice long vacation to start with.
You are thoroughly unhinged.
 
anatta said:
oh please.
Border control is hardly "white nationalist ". Illegals take the shit agriculture jobs -but they also depress wages
in areas like carpentry.
A sane immigration policy based on skill sets/enforced guest workers as Trump proposed, as well as keeping out repeat criminals
is what is needed.

Buchanan has been a slayer of neo-cons since the Iraq war- if not before- while the rest of America
was caught up in 'yellow ribbon fever'
Click to expand...

What really depresses wages in careers like carpentry is the destruction of trade unions. Now any contractor can hire non-union workers -- often illegals as you pointed out -- with little or no repercussions. When the trades were unionized members had to go through training programs, and in some cases be vouched for by a current member.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
What really depresses wages in careers like carpentry is the destruction of trade unions. Now any contractor can hire non-union workers -- often illegals as you pointed out -- with little or no repercussions. When the trades were unionized members had to go through training programs, and in some cases be vouched for by a current member.
Click to expand...
I'm not an expert on that. But that makes sense enough.
There are too many anti-union forces however in the world, and with globalization
( and because companies look at workers as costs) I don't think that can change back.

Border control is an imperfect answer, but it's the best I can think of
( along with a guest worker immigration visa that is enforced)
 
anatta said:
I'm not an expert on that. But that makes sense enough.
There are too many anti-union forces however in the world, and with globalization
( and because companies look at workers as costs) I don't think that can change back.

Border control is an imperfect answer, but it's the best I can think of
( along with a guest worker immigration visa that is enforced)
Click to expand...

Yeah, I don't think that unions are coming back. Reagan took care of that, as did globalization as you pointed out. Interesting though how we didn't need a wall when unions were strong.

I don't think that a wall is the answer either. Maybe if we start punishing employers who hire illegals instead? It does little good to round up workers and ship them back; the same employers will just find new ones to take their places -- unless there is a penalty for doing so. Guest worker programs are a good idea, but Trump's base will never go for that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top