MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
I love how your only option for a response is acting like a child.
Like this?
"Looks like it's working?"
How delusional ARE you guys? Really?
I love how your only option for a response is acting like a child.
"Looks like it's working?"
How delusional ARE you guys? Really?
China just announced their intentions for sanctions, and you're expecting NK to abide yesterday? Again, that's not how it works.
"Screaming like a baby"? Look, if you don't want to have a serious discussion, just say so.
Why hadn't the UN had an influence in eight years of The Obama?
I think it is hilarious. Strategy or not. Stop your fretting. Do you think we are going to war? Really?
Like this?
How is that acting like a child? You guys ARE delusional. You have been about Trump from the get-go.
I'm not going to tiptoe around that.
There you go, doubling down on childish.
I love how your only option for a response is acting like a child.
Okay so you don't want to answer the question. Noted.
Tweeting has little to do with anything. The UN Speech was clarion, and backed up with sanctions that bite.
It has to play out. Notably various other countries don't seem to have a problem w/Trumps speech
what "strategy" are you talking about? Warning of retalliation by an attack?I doubt there is a single country out there that enjoys watching these 2 infants recklessly one-up each other on the stupid rhetoric. It's hardly a surprise that few are willing to talk about it publicly - most likely want to just stay out of it.
I think we can judge what Trump is saying on its own merit. I don't think even his most ardent supporters would deny that it's a risky strategy, but is it a well-calculated risk? I think for it to be that, Trump would have to have a keen understanding of not only psychology in general, but of Kim's psychology...and I think that is very unlikely. I doubt Trump has even thought through the possible reactions he could get that much. It's almost like he's just playing to his base or something.
But, he's betting that Kim won't do something unpredictable & stupid. Would you bet on that?
what "strategy" are you talking about? Warning of retalliation by an attack?
Why would he not put lil Kim on notice?
well you need to be clear..what rhetoric? The UN speech or the tweets?The exaggerated, doomsday rhetoric. How much explanation to you need on this?
Nice try, but it's you being childish. Your side lost, so get over it and start acting like an adult.LOL - you have kind of a different standard for Trump on that.
Nice try, but it's you being childish. Your side lost, so get over it and start acting like an adult.
Talk about a nothing burger. That's your opinion, and it defies logic. The Obama appeases, China does nothing. Trump talks tough- China acts positively.That's a nothing burger of a response.
Bottom line: Trump's reckless words haven't affected China's actions at all. China - and the UN and the rest of the world - are just responding to the escalated threat from NK.
Talk about a nothing burger. That's your opinion, and it defies logic. The Obama appeases, China does nothing. Trump talks tough- China acts positively.
And they're doing that because of "rocket man" and "fire & fury"?
You guys shouldn't vote.
Looks like it's working, another Trump victory in the making:https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...c70b6f98089_story.html?utm_term=.8773a3bea9d2
Please explain, in detail, how China's actions are a direct result of Trump using language like "fire & fury"/"rocket man," and not a result of NK's increased activity and the UN's escalation of sanctions.
I'm all ears.
You want me to prove to you that Trump has some kind of magic switch that makes China do his bidding? That's not how it works.
They're doing it, what else matters?
Has any other president gotten China to act like this?