Cite it. Because I never heard of that. Post that evidence.
Wow. Read a book.
Cite it. Because I never heard of that. Post that evidence.
Wow. Read a book.
Cite it. Because I never heard of that. Post that evidence.
So, you lied.
https://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-justice-department-white-house-20161123-story.html
How can you seriously claim you've never heard of this precedent? That blows my mind.
No, you are just completely ignorant. Not my fault.
As usual, ask someone to substantiate their claim and they write insults.
Read the article I posted, This is common knowledge. It is long standing protocol. You shouldn't lecture your superiors on things you know nothing about. There are many times I think to myself that I wish you'd get off my side. You are a bull in a china shop. Educate yourself instead of shooting your mouth off and you'll do a lot better.
Not reading the link. Present the evidence. A link is only for a citation of text you post.
Now you're trolling.
So you wish to remain willfully ignorant. Okay, suit yourself. You should learn to admit when you're wrong. it goes a long way to establishing credibility.
Block me. I won't miss you that much. I promise.
Fuck you.
I accept your unconditional surrender. You are flat out wrong. Period. Full stop. You've just entered the realm where the Trumptards live, pal.
Look, telling someone to read a link is not making an argument. So, that's all you have. No need to continue.
"Long-standing protocol dictates that the FBI and Justice Department operate free of political influence or meddling from the White House. That’s one reason that the FBI director serves a 10-year term and does not turn over the reins as presidential administrations come and go. It also means that presidents are not supposed to supervise, initiate or stop law enforcement investigations."
I suspect you are too entrenched to admit that you're wrong. Again, suit yourself.
Bye.
And that from a lawyer who DEFENDED Trump in the first impeachment trial. I guess sedition was a bridge too far, even for him.
Yes, I'm aware of that. Please, don't try lecturing me. There is a long standing tradition of Presidents not interfering in the function of DOJ, because that would give the DOJ the appearance of a political tool of the President. I'm surprised you weren't aware of that. Shameful.
Nope. The next coup will be non-violent and completely legal. States will install the next President. The vote will be a sham.