You're going to hell, its 6,000 years old if you have any respect for the bible.
I've never heard any Christian I know, claim the universe is 6000 years old. Not saying there aren't some out there, but I've never met one. I also know several theologians and biblical history scholars, and none of them interpret anything in the Bible about the Earth being only 6000 years old. So apparently, your source of information is incorrect.
30% in 100 years? Is that something that might associate with the fact that man has industrialized more than ever, in the history of the world, in the last 100 years?
It might, if we hadn't ever seen CO2 levels this high, but we have. Botanists say that most plant life on Earth evolved in a much richer concentration of CO2, and up until about the past 10,000 years, were actually 'starving' for carbon dioxide. Now, I don't think there was much industrialization going on back when plants evolved, but if you have some evidence to suggest that was the cause, I am all ears!
Come on, to claim that man is not contributing to the carbon buildup that is going on is to plug your ears. Not the first time for you, not the third, or 150th, but still, if you don't think that the industrialization at the scale that its been going for generations and the scale at which it is accelerating is causing any climate problems at all, then what's the point? You're just taking the polar opposite, and looking like a jackass in the process.
I don't know that man-made CO2 is causing "climate problems" as you claim. I do know that every living mammal to ever inhabit the earth for all of history, produced CO2 and released it into the atmosphere, you are doing that very thing right this moment as you read this post. It is impossible for mammals to avoid this, as they process O2 into CO2 to live. I also know that plant life requires CO2 to live, it process it into O2. Whether man-made CO2 has an effect on climate, I don't know, and neither do you. Even IF that were the case, you don't know that reducing it will reverse the effects or change an inevitable outcome. You want to spend trillions of dollars which doesn't belong to you, in order to do something that may not even be necessary, and I oppose that... I think our money can be better used for other purposes. No fingers in the ears, not ignoring what you have to say, I just disagree with your assessment because there is no basis for it.
Belching megatons of pollution into the air every single day is going to affect our enviornment and out climate. Why has this become a political football? Because of morons on the left who want to regulate everything, and reactionist sub morons on the right who allow them the elicit knee-jerk reactions from retards like you!!!
Now we've jumped to "pollution" and not carbon dioxide! And it is ME who is having 'knee jerk reactions' here? Carbon dioxide is a natural element, a part of nature, one of the more abundant natural elements in the universe. For you to consider it "pollution" is just a flat out fraudulent lie, but what else can we expect from your bunch of fanatics?
You have no basis in science to support your view. It doesn't exist anymore, the information you relied on was found to be fraudulent. Yet you want to maintain your argument without any factual basis for it, or science back it up. Perhaps you should consider forming a Church? Because that is what you now have with this movement, a FAITH!
