Giuliani admits that he lied about election fraud

PostmodernProphet said:
nope.....just pointing out that while the credibility of the US Attorney's office is twice that of yours, it still is less than acceptable.....meanwhile you still seem to be acknowledging that no one has even put her under oath to answer these important questions.....
Click to expand...

So show us what you have, that counter the "FINDINGS' of the republican US attorney who actually investigated it and found they were "official lock boxes"?

If you want to claim he is wrong and you are right what is that based upon? What do yo have to show he was lying and you have proof?
 
PostmodernProphet said:
nope.....just pointing out that while the credibility of the US Attorney's office is twice that of yours, it still is less than acceptable.....meanwhile you still seem to be acknowledging that no one has even put her under oath to answer these important questions.....
Click to expand...

What are the important questions; just two or three will do?
 
BartenderElite said:
I can see that it doesn't matter how much evidence people post completely debunking the "suitcases under desks" claim, which was comical to begin with.

Big Lie believers have their story - and they're sticking to it.

One thing I know for sure: neither Trump nor Giuliani looked into the facts of this for a single second before deciding to turn the lives of selfless election workers upside down. Because they were just so mad about losing.
Click to expand...

I think you will see it is only the bottom feeders of MAGA who still believe these most ridiculous debunked lies. There are others who are maga but smart enough to move to other points.

PostModernIdiot is always, 100% of the time, in the shallow end of the pool with the dumbest of the dumbest, especially is we are discussing anything with legal issues.
 
Our election system makes it impossible to flood a precinct with votes. You hand them your info. They check the signature if your name is in the precinct ledger book. Only people assigned to that precinct can vote. If it is approved, they hand you a ballot. If a bunch are dropped off, or carried in, they cannot be counted. Their names are not in the book. After the polls close, you collect all the votes and make sure they match the number have voted. You do not take the voting information to the clearing house until they match.
 
Nordberg said:
Our election system makes it impossible to flood a precinct with votes. You hand them your info. They check the signature if your name is in the precinct ledger book. Only people assigned to that precinct can vote. If it is approved, they hand you a ballot. If a bunch are dropped off, or carried in, they cannot be counted. Their names are not in the book. After the polls close, you collect all the votes and make sure they match the number have voted. You do not take the voting information to the clearing house until they match.
Click to expand...

All investigations have proved that, while voter fraud exists, it's rare and has not altered the outcome of any state or federal elections. Small towns and HOAs could easily be more corrupt.

The 2020 was one of the most examined elections this or the last century yet the nutjobs want us to believe it "was rigged". LOL
 
QP! said:
So show us what you have, that counter the "FINDINGS' of the republican US attorney who actually investigated it and found they were "official lock boxes"?

If you want to claim he is wrong and you are right what is that based upon? What do yo have to show he was lying and you have proof?
Click to expand...
I haven't even seen the proof that some Republican US attorney actually investigated it and found they were official lock boxes......what do you have to show you aren't lying?......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
when can we expect the results of that investigation.....it appears that in addition to the four counting votes, you need to investigate one county official from the most Demmycrat county in Georgia and an unnamed state inspector of unknown political stance.......I thought you said it would require a conspiracy of tens of thousands to change the results of the election....
Click to expand...

The fact that Rudy admitted he lied about the whole thing makes this a moot point.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
Fact: (as can easily be observed on video) The observers left.....whether you believe the observers were told or not, they obviously were not there.....the counting resumed on four cases of ballots that were removed from under a table, which was NOT where the other cases of ballots were brought from.....it WAS done in the early hours when the observers were not present.....it was during that same period when there was a swing of ballots that was in Biden's favor........why DON'T you want her questioned under oath about that?......
Click to expand...

She would have been questioned under oath if Rudy had not admitted he lied making the trial unnecessary. He did not want all the facts to come out in the trial plus he knew he would lose since he could not prove his lies were true.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I haven't even seen the proof that some Republican US attorney actually investigated it and found they were official lock boxes......what do you have to show you aren't lying?......
Click to expand...

In addition to the mountains of evidence against it presented on this thread, which you continue to ignore: the "national election rigging" would have to be a real Keystone Kops operation to forget that, oh no! There were cameras recording things when they brought out the "secret suitcases" that they so stealthily "hid" under desks in a public place.

I often wonder if you guys can hear yourselves when you make these accusations.

These particular accusations hurt innocent people. Just an FYI.
 
Flash said:
She would have been questioned under oath if Rudy had not admitted he lied making the trial unnecessary. He did not want all the facts to come out in the trial plus he knew he would lose since he could not prove his lies were true.
Click to expand...

the fact that she violated both state law and the US constitution in processing ballots that night is not excused because this case was settled......you as well as I should demand those facts come out.......
 
BartenderElite said:
In addition to the mountains of evidence against it presented on this thread, which you continue to ignore: the "national election rigging" would have to be a real Keystone Kops operation to forget that, oh no! There were cameras recording things when they brought out the "secret suitcases" that they so stealthily "hid" under desks in a public place.

I often wonder if you guys can hear yourselves when you make these accusations.

These particular accusations hurt innocent people. Just an FYI.
Click to expand...
sorry....no one ever said they were intelligent....they did put Biden in office after all..........and the fact you won't investigate their actions doesn't justify an unconstitutional election.....(the "innocent people" line was good for a laugh by the way)......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
sorry....no one ever said they were intelligent....they did put Biden in office after all..........and the fact you won't investigate their actions doesn't justify an unconstitutional election.....(the "innocent people" line was good for a laugh by the way)......
Click to expand...

You'll never change your mind on it. But they are innocent, and Trump & Giuliani were lying, desperately.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I wonder how much we'll all have to pay because you put the Pale Faced Pedophile in the Oval Office with an unconstitutional election.......
Click to expand...

You make false assumptions. I did not vote for Biden.

The election would only have been unconstitutional if Trump had succeeded in blocking the constitutional process of verifying electors. The false electors were a bust, the court cases were a bust because none of them presented any evidence, his begging for votes from Georgia was a bust, the attack on the Capitol was a bust, and now Rudy's admission of lying about the Georgia election proves those claims were false. That proves there was never any evidence of fraud. In Mark Meadow's new book he says his son could only find a small hand full of "dead" voters, not the 5,000 claimed by Trump. I am still waiting for any JPP posters to name one U. S. county that had more votes than registered voters proving another Trump lie.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I haven't even seen the proof that some Republican US attorney actually investigated it and found they were official lock boxes......what do you have to show you aren't lying?......
Click to expand...

I have video of the republican US attorney speaking in his own words about the FINDINGS of his investigation, which was that it was an 'official lock box'. That is what shows i am not lying.


So again, I ask you again ..."If you want to claim he is wrong and you are right what is that based upon?" ...


What actual proof do you have that it was suitcases? What is your source?
 
BartenderElite said:
In addition to the mountains of evidence against it presented on this thread, which you continue to ignore: the "national election rigging" would have to be a real Keystone Kops operation to forget that, oh no! There were cameras recording things when they brought out the "secret suitcases" that they so stealthily "hid" under desks in a public place.

I often wonder if you guys can hear yourselves when you make these accusations.

These particular accusations hurt innocent people. Just an FYI.
Click to expand...

I give PostModernIdiot a break on that one as that is exactly how republi'can' derps would do it.

Because they are painfully dumb and are continually doing and saying the most stupid things, they assume others would do the same.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top