So tell us about even one of the many cases brought since the 2020 election where both sides did litigate the claim of widespread election fraud and the jury or trial court found that fraud occurred.
Georgia Grand Jury Report - No Election Fraud
- Thread starter LurchAddams
- Start date
So tell us about even one of the many cases brought since the 2020 election where both sides did litigate the claim of widespread election fraud and the jury or trial court found that fraud occurred.
They're not going to give up the big lie. They're like a dog with a bone. To do otherwise would be to admit how unpopular their ideas are.
We've been down this road before, haven't we? Guess #TRE45ON is counting on the fact that his minions are too ill-informed to understand that this grand jury was not the indicting kind, only the recommendation kind. And that it was charged with (among other things) determining if there was widespread election fraud. He's not in the least exonerated, not yet.
Till they run out of the money of the Gullibles, that's how many.
Good because there is a ham sandwich down the street at Mara Lago that needs indicting.
I hope so, but I'm thinking they'd take the 5th rather than lie under oath.
Aha! I predicted this!
Your point?
You water carriers for Trump are so predictable. If a grand jury comes back with results you don't like, they're "unconstitutional" and "fake" and "biased." We've all noticed, on the other hand, the deafening silence from you Reichwingers when their results are something to your liking. So tell us, O Savant One, just what exactly is "unconstitutional" about grand juries?
The Grand Jury is saying the lying under oath already happened.
Indeed they did.
I've held that position for over 35 years. I held it on Amazon. Trump has nothing to do with my position on Grand Juries. It has nothing to do with politics. There is no representation at a Grand Jury, a simple convincing isn't difficult to conclude an indictment. All because there wasn't enough evidence to make a legal arrest.
Savant? Yep! There's a little bit if that in me. You know it
evince
Truthmatters
Time to go after people who are spreading the lies of foreign enemies in an attempt to destroy our democracy
evince
Truthmatters
I've held that position for over 35 years. I held it on Amazon. Trump has nothing to do with my position on Grand Juries. It has nothing to do with politics. There is no representation at a Grand Jury, a simple convincing isn't difficult to conclude an indictment. All because there wasn't enough evidence to make a legal arrest.
Savant? Yep! There's a little bit if that in me. You know it
You are the enemy of America
But they wouldn't hand an indictment to Durham. Which proves, once again, what a total shame that investigation was.
Beat me to it, dammit.
Joe Capitalist
Racism is a disease
Yup. Republiclowns have conveniently found different things they can tell themselves that allow them NOT to come to terms with the truth.
The truth scares the shit out of Republiclowns. it makes them all butthurt.
Clearly Durham didn’t ask for one, because then would have been forced to prosecute a case that had no good evidence.
Here is the larger question. Who are the 18 people that were recommended for indictment. That's a LOT of people. Eastman, Flynn, Rudy, Bannon, Clark, maybe the fake electors? That is a LOT of people.