Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
is it your claim that the economy has always improved since obama took office? that it has never declined?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Generic Presidential Ballot
- Thread starter Canceled2
- Start date
is it your claim that the economy has always improved since obama took office? that it has never declined?
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
I get this is a fun topic to discuss but it is 17 months before the election. We don't even know who all is running for the Republicans yet. And don't 'generics' always tend to trend higher than a real person?
yes. iirc, at this time obama wasn't really on the radar.....i believe many thought hillary would win
is it your claim that the economy has always improved since obama took office? that it has never declined?
It is my contention that the economy is better since Obama took office.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
The economy was only beginning to get "bad" when Oblama took office. The point being, his policies have not improved the economy to any kind of degree that real "success" can be claimed. The second bailout, that was ALL Oblama, has not provided one iota of economic turn-around...not one-we stll have record unemployment and are still facing foreclosures and still shedding jobs and still watching states verge on bankruptcy! Indeed it can be argued his policies have hindered growth.
McCain it can likewise be argued may have helped the economy-no one knows nor can know- This is all about Oblama's failed economic policies. This race is all about that- ALL of it.
so the economy did not turn bad under bush??
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
It is my contention that the economy is better since Obama took office.
immediately upon taking office or did the economy continue its downward spiral?
is it your contention obama is the reason the economy has picked up?
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
One could make the case that 6 to 9 months before he got elected that the stock market got scared as soon as it was clear Obama would beat Mcain.
But could one back up that claim?
immediately upon taking office or did the economy continue its downward spiral?
Yes, the economy immediately began to rebound as of January 20, 2009. Are you a fucking moron?
is it your contention obama is the reason the economy has picked up?
Yes, Obama is the reason the economy has picked up. What the fuck is the matter with you?
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
Yes, the economy immediately began to rebound as of January 20, 2009. Are you a fucking moron?
Yes, Obama is the reason the economy has picked up. What the fuck is the matter with you?
with you, i never know. your worship of all things left is your downfall....a simple "no" would have sufficed mr. grumpy
But could one back up that claim?
surely you are aware of how to pull a several years chart of the market?
with you, i never know. your worship of all things left is your downfall....a simple "no" would have sufficed mr. grumpy
I think Obama's handling of the economy sucks ass. It just that the Republicans are orders of magnitude worse.
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
surely you are aware of how to pull a several years chart of the market?
Funny, I thought that you made the claim. I also wonder how a stock trend would prove your statement "the stock market got scared as soon as it was clear Obama would beat Mcain."
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
make the case not equal to prove not much regarding the economy is open to proof
So you were bullshitting.
So you were bullshitting.
this shit is really that much over your head, you must be still in college
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
this shit is really that much over your head, you must be still in college
Are you Toppy's troll?
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
The dude's a fucking idiot.
FAIL.
Bye.
FAIL.
Bye.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
I think Obama's handling of the economy sucks ass. It just that the Republicans are orders of magnitude worse.
of course they are....because they aren't liberals
LOL
too predictable, and i bet you just don't like that obama didn't spend MORE with the stimilus...and you believe tarp was a failure....right?
of course they are....because they aren't liberals
LOL
No. It's because their ideas for "fixing" the economy are fucking awful.
too predictable, and i bet you just don't like that obama didn't spend MORE with the stimilus...and you believe tarp was a failure....right?
It is fairly predictable that a liberal would support left-wing policies and oppose right wing dogma (calling them policies isn't justifiable). Obama should have spent more and differently and we should be spending more right now instead of cutting. And TARP was fine. The failure was not implementing robust policies to reform the financial sector and in failing to do anything to resolve the foreclosure crisis.