Southern Chicken
Verified User
What he didn't conclude was whether or not the President should be indicted, and the reason he didn't conclude that was because he didn't think he could thanks to DOJ rules.
Starting to get it
What he didn't conclude was whether or not the President should be indicted, and the reason he didn't conclude that was because he didn't think he could thanks to DOJ rules.
Read the Mueller report and find out. Hint* Do a search in the document on the word conclusion.
So Dershowitz is dumb according to you?
Starting to get it
wrong, can't indict a sitting president ya ignoramus
Yes, you are starting to get it.
So before, you said Mueller couldn't make a case...but the part you left out, was that he couldn't make a case because of the DOJ rules.
So once again, you were caught telling a lie. You weren't being entirely truthful. You were leaving out exculpatory information and you did that expressly to push what you know is a false, sophistic narrative.
Why do you feel compelled to do that?
Do you have something personal at stake here that is causing you to compromise your own ethics (!) for your ego's sake? Cuz that's what it looks like.
You didn't read the report, so what the fuck are you talking about?
I didn't say no such thing. I said he didn't make a conclusion. Liar
I read and understood the report. Liar
I read and understood the report. Liar
I read and understood the report. Liar
I read and understood the report. Liar
I read and understood the report. Liar
I read and understood the report. Liar
I read and understood the report. Liar
What he couldn't conclude was whether or not the President broke the law.
[/B][/I]
Ask John deanThen please explain why Trump ordered McGahn to fire Mueller?
Neat-o! Then you can please explain why Trump ordered his son to lie about the reason for the June 2016 Trump Tower Meeting with Russians?
Same page here but instead of couldnt, i would say He didn't conclude whether or not the President broke the law. The conclusion of the report was left up to the AG.
What he couldn't conclude was whether or not the President broke the law...and he couldn't conclude that partly because Drumpf refused to sit down to an interview with him, but also because of DOJ's rules against indicting a President for felonies.
The conclusion of the report was left up to the AG.