No, that was an ethics oversight report. And remember - you're in this thread lying because the corrupt thug was exposed in the Congressional hearing. Even CNN had to call out Smith for his fascist actions.And it is still one person, want to hear what my barber thinks, he’s one person
Wrong again, your “proof” was an op ed from the National Review written by some guy named “Michael Fragoso,” two paragraphs, which also cited Grassley as some sort of expert on the matter, says it allNo, that was an ethics oversight report. And remember - you're in this thread lying because the corrupt thug was exposed in the Congressional hearing. Even CNN had to call out Smith for his fascist actions.
When you've lost CNN - it should clue you in that you're not going to lie your way out of this;Wrong again, your “proof” was an op ed from the National Review written by some guy named “Michael Fragoso,” two paragraphs, which also cited Grassley as some sort of expert on the matter, says it all
Keep trying, throwing shit out there, even the worse duck hunter gets lucky if he keeps shooting at the flock
Ah, no, Smith wanted a quick trial because he knew he had a case so why would he wait? He also knew if Trump was elected it would kill his case, so it made sense to commenceWhen you've lost CNN - it should clue you in that you're not going to lie your way out of this;
View: https://x.com/overton_news/status/2014427383647150223?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2014427383647150223%7Ctwgr%5E5a822dfb3575f241b055b7de51f090c77a2727db%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftownhall.com%2Ftipsheet%2Fmattvespa%2F2026%2F01%2F23%2Fcnns-top-legal-analyst-zeroes-in-on-where-the-gop-cornered-jack-smith-yesterday-n2669945
ROFLAh, no, Smith wanted a quick trial because he knew he had a case so why would he wait? He also knew if Trump was elected it would kill his case, so it made sense to commence
Yes we did, and that Committee led to charges forwarded the AG that resulted in Smith’s investigation. If Trump’s Judge in Florida, and his Supreme Court, hadn’t weighed in a trial would have proceeded, as Smith confirmed, he had a caseUh, didn't we have Jan 6 committee hearings, Russia Russia Russia committee hearings, and now that shit....Note to Democrats...STOP BEING A FUCKIN DAY LATE AND FUCKIN DAY SHORT ON SHIT AND THEN DO SOMETHING BESIDES WASTE TAX PAYER FUCKIN MONEY ON SHIT THAT GOES NO FUCKIN WHERE.
Given all you got is acronyms, your done, time to get back on the radioROFL
Smith tried to crush our democracy.
He failed.
The Constitution to you is a punchline you sorry bitch. You also brought up the "rule of law"!If not for the Constitution, you democrats could imprison and execute anyone in your way.
But we do have a supreme court, and a Constitution. The rule of law did indeed thwart the plans of fascist thugs like Smith and Garland. The dream you hold of turning America into North Korea died when Obama lost the 2024 election.
Standard Disclaimer: Yes, the name on the ticket was Harris, but everyone knew who ran the country when veggie Joe was wandering around talking to dead people. Kam-Kam was every bit as vacuous as brain dead Biden. Obama wanted a 4th term.
Which acronym did you not grasp?Given all you got is acronyms, your done, time to get back on the radio
Not just belonging in prison, but belonging there for a lifetime. What a sad fucking piece of shit that a-hole is and has been.ROFL
The hearing today proved beyond all question that Jack Smith belongs in prison.
Tell that to your invasion-allowing politicians that took an oath to The Constitution.Then obey the rulings!
ROFL
Smith tried to crush our democracy.
He failed.
Graduated from acronyms, in junior high, and you can repeat the lie as much as you like but it isn’t going to make it any more validWhich acronym did you not grasp?
Smith tampered with the 2024 election by attempting to throw the opposition candidate in prison. He has a lot in common with Pol Pot.