Former FBI Director James Comey indicted on charges of lying to Congress, obstruction of justice

FastLane said:
Watch. The federal assistant AG in a state is mostly an administrative job. Their assistants do the trials.
Click to expand...
Why did none of those assistants conduct the grand jury indictment but it was the acting US Attorney that had just been apppointed?

The problem is that experienced litigators know they can't lie to the court. That makes it hard to prosecute a case where the evidence is weak.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
Comey is going to claim people lie to congress all the time and nothing is done to them. Well - he got that right.
Click to expand...
Why would Comey make that argument? He can simply provide the court all of the statements by Trump and others to show vindictive prosecution.

The funniest part of this will be when the court grants Comey the right to subpoena Trump to ask him if he had any contact with the DOJ about Comey. Once Trump is under oath, he will be fair game for almost any question.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Why did none of those assistants conduct the grand jury indictment but it was the acting US Attorney that had just been apppointed?

The problem is that experienced litigators know they can't lie to the court. That makes it hard to prosecute a case where the evidence is weak.
Click to expand...
This will probably come out as the most ham-handed prosecution in history :)

The sad thing is that we're trusting the security of our nation to these people.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Why would Comey make that argument? He can simply provide the court all of the statements by Trump and others to show vindictive prosecution.

The funniest part of this will be when the court grants Comey the right to subpoena Trump to ask him if he had any contact with the DOJ about Comey. Once Trump is under oath, he will be fair game for almost any question.
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure trump will never testify, even if subpeona'd. SCOTUS is pretty protective of trump.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Why did none of those assistants conduct the grand jury indictment but it was the acting US Attorney that had just been apppointed?

The problem is that experienced litigators know they can't lie to the court. That makes it hard to prosecute a case where the evidence is weak.
Click to expand...
Sorry, moron. You're gonna have to face the fact that Comey has been indicted. It's heading to trial.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Why would Comey make that argument? He can simply provide the court all of the statements by Trump and others to show vindictive prosecution.
Click to expand...
Apparently not.
Poor Richard Saunders said:
The funniest part of this will be when the court grants Comey the right to subpoena Trump to ask him if he had any contact with the DOJ about Comey. Once Trump is under oath, he will be fair game for almost any question.
Click to expand...
Nope. You have no idea how court rules are set, do you?
 
LurchAddams said:
This will probably come out as the most ham-handed prosecution in history :)

The sad thing is that we're trusting the security of our nation to these people.
Click to expand...
I'll trust restoring security to Trump, since you idiot Democrats want to keep the riots, arson, and violence going, and you want to harbor illegal aliens.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top