Based Chad
Was it me?
Because being under investigation does not indicate guilt.
Vote on him.
Let him be scotus. Continue the investigation. If he's found guilty then impeach him at that point. That seems fair to me.
Ford Testimony
- Thread starter anatta
- Start date
Because being under investigation does not indicate guilt.
Vote on him.
Let him be scotus. Continue the investigation. If he's found guilty then impeach him at that point. That seems fair to me.
Did you believe Cosby's victim?
and you- yours.
emotions betray truths. they cloud an ability to discern strictly by examination.
Much like TDS itself they are not rational. The woman now says she travels extensively by air.
Why be polite to racist piece of dog shit like him?
Watching Conservatives, who spent the last few weeks doing everything they could to oppose an investigation, call for an investigation now is one of those :
: moments.
Good idea, the FBI investigation should be reopened.
It sure did when Trump made that very argument about Clinton in 2016.
After an investigation. Why would you vote on someone without an investigation into serious allegations against him? All you're saying is that those allegations have no bearing on what you ultimately want. So why not just say that you support Brett even if he raped someone?
Don't understand the logic here; if he's found guilty of crimes serious enough to warrant impeachment, why wouldn't you investigate those allegations first, before making a terrible mistake?
Your argument makes absolutely no sense at all.
Just on HER
cancel2 2022
Canceled
She hoped to do it anonymously but that didn't work out for her.
On the allegations.
That's very easy; the liberal left are desperate. They are willing to destroy anyone, smear anyone and attack anyone to prevent Trump from pursuing his agenda and getting this nominee through.
I have one for you; if this man is not is not qualified to sit on the Supreme Court, who is?
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
Not sure if you understand how investigations like this work.
Either you are naive, or dishonest. These attack dogs will do ANYTHING to prevent this man from getting on the bench. They believe that Roe v Wade is under threat and no effort is too much.
Again; if Kavanaugh does not have the qualifications to sit on the bench, then who is? If this were a serious issue, why did Democrats wait until the last minute, of the last hour, of the last day to bring forth these many allegations?
It is dishonest and deranged to think this is a serious matter and not a political hatchet job.
that would be HER background check, yes...Kav's already had 6
It's very easy to figure out that she is lying; everyone named has clearly stated they were never at the party. She can't remember when, where or who. She can't find anyone to corroborate her claims.
It seems that the ONLY person who remembers the even as she claims is HER. What would the FBI investigate? The same witnesses who say she is lying about them?
Try to be honest for once in your pathetic loser life.