For all you R's who blindly trust the oil Companies...

And if we had elected people who desired to actually police this industry instead of not inforcing the exsisting laws then maybe it would have worked out better.

When you hire idiots who think their job is a joke you get these types of results.

Want better inforcement of the exsisting laws then dont hire people who think government IS the problem.
Are you saying that the elected officials currently in power, and those in 1998 when those safety measures were supposed to be installed, had no urge to police this industry? I'm sorry, it is the Executive who has the power to police... It's unfortunate that your heroes have such obvious feet of clay.

Why do you think Clinton thought that "government is the problem" and therefore didn't have his own administration actually ensure that the laws were followed? I never heard Clinton say that "government is the problem"...

And what I said should be done now... That is also within the power of the executive. Enforcement is their purview. His US Attorneys should be laying out the cases right now...
 
the top 40 spills in the world were not here, that shoots to shit desh's retarded statement about it being gov fault. In fact hiring industry experts is the way to go. Miss Jackson head of EPA even said it would be industry experts that stop the flow and clean up the oil. I bet she doesn't have a clue how too.
Shouldn't we have most of the top 40 spills if our gov is soo bad and we use 25% of the worlds oil? foolish libtards
 
This rig was started in 1998 and was put into production in 2001. Since then it has drilled new holes.

There is now evidence it may actually drilled beyond its legal drilling rights.

Whoever was inspecting it may have been been paid off or fooled by the company.

Do you remember the SEC guys under the Bush team?

How many inspectors were watching porn instead of inspecting?

What deal did Cheney work out with these assholes that we were not allowed to see or hear?
 
the us is among the best at not spilling, the top 40 spills aren't here but we use 25% of the oil. WE need to do much better but we are already good.
 
This rig was started in 1998 and was put into production in 2001. Since then it has drilled new holes.

There is now evidence it may actually drilled beyond its legal drilling rights.

Whoever was inspecting it may have been been paid off or fooled by the company.

Do you remember the SEC guys under the Bush team?

How many inspectors were watching porn instead of inspecting?

What deal did Cheney work out with these assholes that we were not allowed to see or hear?
So, more than a year after the new guys took office, and their perfection spread throughout everything we have them running around trying to convince people they were "on it from the first day!"

They have no offer of any solution, they didn't catch these people who were "tricking" them...

Yeah, the perfection of government under those who believe in it with all their hearts is a lamentable fantasy that is harmful and foolish. It doesn't take Rs to show that government is inefficient and incapable, it proves that time and again regardless of who is in charge.

People who believe in the government like they think others believe in the companies (we don't), are constantly on the wrong side of the argument. The perfect government with supermajorities and everything, wasn't capable of seeing through the ruse. To the contrary, they were so fooled as to allow drilling where even the Rs hadn't....
 
So I have a question for those of you who belive that the price of oil is simply set by supply and demand.... and not fixed by the oil companies/government.


Why when one ship of oil spilled its load, the Exxon Valdze, did the price of gas JUMP within a few days, yet when this rig exploded and was rendered unoperational.... not a blip?


Could it be that they already have the price of oil at the breaking point and cant get away with it just now?

1) The price of oil spiked after the rig exploded. Over the last two days it has come back down in value due to the spike in the dollar (caused by the flight from EU)

2) You are a fucking retard.
 
This rig was started in 1998 and was put into production in 2001. Since then it has drilled new holes.

There is now evidence it may actually drilled beyond its legal drilling rights.

Whoever was inspecting it may have been been paid off or fooled by the company.

Do you remember the SEC guys under the Bush team?

How many inspectors were watching porn instead of inspecting?

What deal did Cheney work out with these assholes that we were not allowed to see or hear?

Lets see.... under the Clinton SEC

1) Enron was occurring
2) World Com was occurring
3) Global Crossing was occurring
4) Maddoff was occurring
5) Qwest was occurring

Under the Bush SEC

1) Maddoff was occurring
2) Enron was busted
3) World com was busted
4) Global crossing was busted
5) Qwest was busted

Now, do provide us with all of your evidence that they were drilling new holes and drilling in areas they weren't supposed to.
 
toppy....

I spoke to one of my clients who is a geologist. He said the most likely cause of the explosion was due to the 'drilling muds not being the right weight and that they likely hit an over pressurized zone in the thick sediment.'
 
toppy....

I spoke to one of my clients who is a geologist. He said the most likely cause of the explosion was due to the 'drilling muds not being the right weight and that they likely hit an over pressurized zone in the thick sediment.'

that could be, there is also a lot of talk of Halliburton doing a shitty cement job.
 
Lets see.... under the Clinton SEC

1) Enron was occurring
2) World Com was occurring
3) Global Crossing was occurring
4) Maddoff was occurring
5) Qwest was occurring

Under the Bush SEC

1) Maddoff was occurring
2) Enron was busted
3) World com was busted
4) Global crossing was busted
5) Qwest was busted

Now, do provide us with all of your evidence that they were drilling new holes and drilling in areas they weren't supposed to.

Since this is how you think care to dispute any of this Desh?

What President signed the deregulating Glass-Steagal in 1999?

What President signed the massive new regulations Sarbenes-Oxley in 2002?
 
And Jarod why do you purposefully put inflamitory (sp) titles on your threads? For example we all know one of the people you are talking about is Topspin who is obviously not a Republican. It is sort of a rhetorical question because I know you are doing it to flame I guess I'm curious why you enjoy flaming so much?
 
If you are not an R with blind trust, I am not talking about you... so dont be so sensative....!
 
I'm a turbo-lib and have nearly blind trust in big oil.
But i drive a car

I drive a car, but I also live .37 miles from work and walk many days.

I am for the government making excessive amounts of insenatives for the development of alternative fuel sources, and I have supported the use of my tax dollars for the R&D into alternative fuel sources.

I belive that the money we poured into Iraq would have delt a bigger blow to the terrorists had it been used to promote alternative sources of energy and energy independence.
 
Back
Top