Fl voter laws tossed by judge

https://www.nytimes.com/1986/10/25/us/gop-memo-tells-of-black-vote-cut.html



A Federal judge today released a memorandum in which a Republican official said the party's program to pare the voting rolls in the name of ''ballot integrity'' ''could keep the black vote down considerably'' in a Louisiana Senate primary.

The memorandum, prepared by Kris Wolfe, a Middle Western regional director for the Republican National Committee, was sent to Lanny Griffith, the committee's regional director for the South. It was obtained by the Democratic National Committee in a $10 million lawsuit against the Republican committee over the ''ballot integrity'' program.



Reagan cheated
 
They have already been caught catching the republicans cheating in elections



Over and over and over and over

Dont be naughty now,.....you know your minders will bring out the "jacket" and give you the happy shot like they always do when you get rowdy.
 
The state passed laws in violation of laws that Congress had passed superseding the legislature's ability to discriminate against black voters.

there was no discrimination against black voters.......perhaps discrimination against people the demmycrats allowed to vote illegally in 2020, but cheaters are not a protected class.......the idiot judge will be overturned......
 
ROFLMAO. That is what you are claiming is the factual basis? It seems you have failed to address the facts presented on any of the other 288 pages.

For instance you failed to include why the court states that the Florida legislature has attacked the voting rights of black constituents for 20 years. The court provides evidence of that some of which I have already included here.
the court stated that because he's a partisan hack........it wasn't evidence, it was his own prejudice.......his conclusion was that, due to history, a conservative legislature is 'per se' discrimination.....he did not address how drop boxes limit only black votes.......he will be overturned......
 
Those are the three main points in simple English for you to understand



Why would any judge side against those salient points?

because the most salient point is that the Florida legislature passed a law and one federal district judge doesn't have the authority to change what the legislature did, simply because he claims Florida has a history of discrimination.......the issue he has to decide is if THIS statute discriminates........since it applies the same to every voter in the state it obviously does not..........
 
And they were found by the judge to be unconstitutional and backed by false claims of fraud that NEVER EXISTED


Their “facts” were found desperately lacking by the judge


Now what you pathetic lying fool

idiot......the fact that is not lacking is that the state legislature set a rule for a state election and federal judges can't change that rule because they are pissed off........he will be overturned you pathetic lying fool......
 
An Obama appointed judge made this ruling. Given their track record on things like this, expect this to be overturned in appeal.
 
https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/...election-/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS




A federal judge on Thursday struck down portions of Florida’s new election law, siding with liberal groups opposed to the restrictions on drop boxes for mail-in ballots and third-party voter registration.

U.S. District Judge Mark Walker declared most of the law unconstitutional. He wrote that voting rights in the U.S. are “under siege” because of racial gerrymandering of congressional districts.

Not a lawyer, but any idea what a higher court would do?

FWIW, I agree with the Judge, but our laws remain the law even if abused but not broken.
 
https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/...election-/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS




A federal judge on Thursday struck down portions of Florida’s new election law, siding with liberal groups opposed to the restrictions on drop boxes for mail-in ballots and third-party voter registration.

U.S. District Judge Mark Walker declared most of the law unconstitutional. He wrote that voting rights in the U.S. are “under siege” because of racial gerrymandering of congressional districts.

Good as in thumbs down to the enemy from within.
 
the court stated that because he's a partisan hack........it wasn't evidence, it was his own prejudice.......his conclusion was that, due to history, a conservative legislature is 'per se' discrimination.....he did not address how drop boxes limit only black votes.......he will be overturned......

Perhaps you should read the ruling before you claim something isn't addressed in the ruling when it clearly is.
 
Back
Top