Fl voter laws tossed by judge

1. Florida’s elections officials don’t want S.B. 90. The new restrictions make their jobs unnecessarily harder.



Let’s just look at this one a minute


The entire election system in Florida doesn’t like the laws


They said it cost money and effort to the people and the system and is unnessesary
 
The people the state chose and pay to run the elections per the constitution say the law sucks ass


And does nothing to protect elections




Does that give you ANY pause?
 
evince said:
https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/...election-/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS




A federal judge on Thursday struck down portions of Florida’s new election law, siding with liberal groups opposed to the restrictions on drop boxes for mail-in ballots and third-party voter registration.

U.S. District Judge Mark Walker declared most of the law unconstitutional. He wrote that voting rights in the U.S. are “under siege” because of racial gerrymandering of congressional districts.
Click to expand...

Judges aren't allowed to legislate from the bench like that. That ruling will be thrown out and that judge should be impeached for trying to do something so far out of his purview as what he did there.

The state legislature is who determines election laws in every state.
 
Now this one



2. Don’t forget — voter suppression laws are bad because they harm voters. There is a real impact on real people.




The real IMPACT


It keeps LEGAL voters from their rights


It stops NO FRAUD


but it keeps legal American voters from being able to vote



That is unconstitutional
 
Matt Dillon said:
Judges aren't allowed to legislate from the bench like that. That ruling will be thrown out and that judge should be impeached for trying to do something so far out of his purview as what he did there.

The state legislature is who determines election laws in every state.
Click to expand...


The system tasks judges with determining theses cases


It’s why they have a bench to sit on



You being an idiot who doesn’t understand the laws doesn’t effect the actual system putin ass butterer
 
evince said:
https://www.democracydocket.com/news/three-trial-takeaways-floridas-voter-suppression-law/



1. Florida’s elections officials don’t want S.B. 90. The new restrictions make their jobs unnecessarily harder.



2. Don’t forget — voter suppression laws are bad because they harm voters. There is a real impact on real people.



3. The GOP’s dominant voter fraud claims don’t find the same footing in the courtroom.

Throughout the trial, the state defendants continued to make implications that the civil and voting rights organizations challenging this law were committing various crimes. In response, the plaintiffs filed a motion to preclude the defendants from making such unfounded implications: “Defendants’ repeated insinuations of illegal or criminal conduct are inappropriate, offensive, and time-wasting. Such questions, and the answers they are attempting to solicit, are irrelevant.”

In this trial, the GOP defendants (and intervenors Republican National Committee and National Republican Senatorial Committee) continued their desperate search to find voter fraud where none exists. Plaintiff expert witnesses testified to the non-existence of such fraud, citing a conservative database that only identified 15 instances of possible fraud from the millions of votes cast in Florida between 2003 and 2020.
Click to expand...

Oh there was wayyy more fraud than that going on. Loading up buses with migrant farm workers and paying them $20 a pop to go vote for one.

In 2016 they had caravans of packed minivans with people from out of state to go vote.

How dare the Democrat voter fraud be stopped! It needs to stop. :|
 
Matt Dillon said:
Oh there was wayyy more fraud than that going on. Loading up buses with migrant farm workers and paying them $20 a pop to go vote for one.

In 2016 they had caravans of packed minivans with people from out of state to go vote.

How dare the Democrat voter fraud be stopped! It needs to stop. :|
Click to expand...


Um cock gobble master,


Every judge threw those baseless lies right out of court like sixty times

Do you ever get tired of cracken spooge in your mouth?
 
evince said:
The system tasks judges with determining theses cases


It’s why they have a bench to sit on



You being an idiot who doesn’t understand the laws doesn’t effect the actual system putin ass butterer
Click to expand...

Judges can't just ban changes to election laws for the next 10 years like that buttnugget tried to do.

Especially not when the state legislature passed it. :nono:

That is unconstitutional.
 
evince said:
https://www.democracydocket.com/news/three-trial-takeaways-floridas-voter-suppression-law/



1. Florida’s elections officials don’t want S.B. 90. The new restrictions make their jobs unnecessarily harder.



2. Don’t forget — voter suppression laws are bad because they harm voters. There is a real impact on real people.



3. The GOP’s dominant voter fraud claims don’t find the same footing in the courtroom.

Throughout the trial, the state defendants continued to make implications that the civil and voting rights organizations challenging this law were committing various crimes. In response, the plaintiffs filed a motion to preclude the defendants from making such unfounded implications: “Defendants’ repeated insinuations of illegal or criminal conduct are inappropriate, offensive, and time-wasting. Such questions, and the answers they are attempting to solicit, are irrelevant.”

In this trial, the GOP defendants (and intervenors Republican National Committee and National Republican Senatorial Committee) continued their desperate search to find voter fraud where none exists. Plaintiff expert witnesses testified to the non-existence of such fraud, citing a conservative database that only identified 15 instances of possible fraud from the millions of votes cast in Florida between 2003 and 2020.
Click to expand...




Try reading the case breakdown



And you will know why everyone agrees you suck major league at debate
 
Matt Dillon said:
Judges can't just ban changes to election laws for the next 10 years like that buttnugget tried to do.

Especially not when the state legislature passed it.
Click to expand...

Um idiot


The Republican Party was under one for like 35 years not long ago


It was taken right up to the SCOTUS and left in place until the court got packed and roberts said that racism doesn’t exist anymore because Obama got elected


I don’t think he can make that case anymore


Because that is exactly what this case proves


That the Republican Party is a pack of racist fucking cheaters
 
evince said:
https://www.democracydocket.com/news/three-trial-takeaways-floridas-voter-suppression-law/



1. Florida’s elections officials don’t want S.B. 90. The new restrictions make their jobs unnecessarily harder.



2. Don’t forget — voter suppression laws are bad because they harm voters. There is a real impact on real people.



3. The GOP’s dominant voter fraud claims don’t find the same footing in the courtroom.

Throughout the trial, the state defendants continued to make implications that the civil and voting rights organizations challenging this law were committing various crimes. In response, the plaintiffs filed a motion to preclude the defendants from making such unfounded implications: “Defendants’ repeated insinuations of illegal or criminal conduct are inappropriate, offensive, and time-wasting. Such questions, and the answers they are attempting to solicit, are irrelevant.”

In this trial, the GOP defendants (and intervenors Republican National Committee and National Republican Senatorial Committee) continued their desperate search to find voter fraud where none exists. Plaintiff expert witnesses testified to the non-existence of such fraud, citing a conservative database that only identified 15 instances of possible fraud from the millions of votes cast in Florida between 2003 and 2020.
Click to expand...

Read it


Actually debate the facts here


We all know you can’t and wont
 
evince said:
1. Florida’s elections officials don’t want S.B. 90. The new restrictions make their jobs unnecessarily harder.



Let’s just look at this one a minute


The entire election system in Florida doesn’t like the laws


They said it cost money and effort to the people and the system and is unnessesary
Click to expand...





2. Don’t forget — voter suppression laws are bad because they harm voters. There is a real impact on real people.
 
evince said:
Try reading the case breakdown



And you will know why everyone agrees you suck major league at debate
Click to expand...

I know what I see with my own two eyes, bitch!

And the girl I was buying the washing machine from said that's what they were doing.

Pretty sure she was the migrant camp whore.
 
evince said:
1. Florida’s elections officials don’t want S.B. 90. The new restrictions make their jobs unnecessarily harder.



Let’s just look at this one a minute


The entire election system in Florida doesn’t like the laws


They said it cost money and effort to the people and the system and is unnessesary
Click to expand...



The people the state chose and pay to run the elections per the constitution say the law sucks ass


And does nothing to protect elections




Does that give you ANY pause?
 
Matt Dillon said:
I know what I see with my own two eyes, bitch!

And the girl I was buying the washing machine from said that's what they were doing.

Pretty sure she was the migrant camp whore.
Click to expand...

I’m sure a judge would be impressed with that level of documentation
 
Should I go get the decades of USA court documentation of the Republican Party getting caught cheating in elections



You do know what Watergate is right?



It’s the building the republicans Robbed to steal the files the Democratic Party had in their offices so Nixon could cheat in an elections


I’ll go get some of the many other cases


You can’t do that


The Dems don’t have a like record
 
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_New_Hampshire_Senate_election_phone_jamming_scandal


The 2002 New Hampshire Senate election phone jamming scandal involved the use of a telemarketing firm hired by that state's Republican Party (NHGOP) for election tampering. The tampering involved using a call center to jam the phone lines of a get out the vote (GOTV) operation. In the end, 900 calls were made for 45 minutes of disruption to the Democratic-leaning call centers.

During that state's 2002 election for the United States Senate seat being vacated by Republican Bob Smith, the NHGOP hired GOP Marketplace, based in northern Virginia, to jam another phone bank being used by the state Democratic Party and the firefighters' union for efforts to turn out voters on behalf of then-Governor of New Hampshire Jeanne Shaheen on Election Day. John E. Sununu, the Republican nominee, won a narrow victory. In addition to criminal prosecutions, disclosures in the case have come from a civil suit filed by the state's Democratic Party against the state's Republican Party (now settled).

Four men were convicted of, or pleaded guilty to, federal crimes and sentenced to prison for their involvement. One conviction was reversed by an appeals court. James Tobin, freed on appeal, was later indicted on charges of lying to the FBI during the original investigation.
 
https://www.nytimes.com/1986/10/25/us/gop-memo-tells-of-black-vote-cut.html



A Federal judge today released a memorandum in which a Republican official said the party's program to pare the voting rolls in the name of ''ballot integrity'' ''could keep the black vote down considerably'' in a Louisiana Senate primary.

The memorandum, prepared by Kris Wolfe, a Middle Western regional director for the Republican National Committee, was sent to Lanny Griffith, the committee's regional director for the South. It was obtained by the Democratic National Committee in a $10 million lawsuit against the Republican committee over the ''ballot integrity'' program.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top