Fl voter laws tossed by judge

anatta said:
Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican, said the law significantly strengthened voter integrity in Florida. He said he anticipated Judge Walker would side with the left-leaning groups trying to block the law based on the court’s prior decisions.

“This is a judicial equivalent of pounding the table, and I think it was performative partisanship,” Mr. DeSantis said at a press conference. “I think that that’s going to be reversed on appeal. The only question is how quickly it gets reversed on appeal, but it’s not going to be able to withstand scrutiny.”
Click to expand...



Who are the judges it’s going to be appealed too?



Let’s remember trump appointed judges shat on trumps lies repeatedly in th election lies his team tried to file
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
You might want to spend 15 minutes and read the US Constitution.
Click to expand...

???....do you disagree?......if so, provide documentation that this has been removed from the constitution.....
Article I, Section 4, Clause 1: The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of choosing Senators.
Click to expand...
 
PostmodernProphet said:
so we are clear that in this instance the judge fucked up?....if not, identify the applicable circumstances......
Click to expand...

Why would right leaning judges decide against the constitution?



Not even trump appointed judges lied for his causes



They won’t in this either
 
evince said:
Why would right leaning judges decide against the constitution?



Not even trump appointed judges lied for his causes



They won’t in this either
Click to expand...

as I said, identify the circumstances which permit this left leaning judge to violate the constitutional requirements for setting the rules for elections.......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
???....do you disagree?......if so, provide documentation that this has been removed from the constitution.....
Click to expand...

Did you only read the first phrase of what you quoted? Or is your ability to understand the English language stunted?

Here. Let me help you by giving you the judge's interpretation of that section of the Constitution. I'll bold the relevant sections including the sections the judge himself highlighted.

On this point, this Court’s analysis starts, and ends, with the text: “The Times,
Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be
Case 4:21-cv-00186-MW-MAF Document 665 Filed 03/31/22 Page 279 of 288

prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time
by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.”
U.S. Const. art. I, § 4, cl. 1 (emphasis added).
The Constitution’s text could not be clearer: Congress gets the final word. This
principle is nearly old as the Union itself. See Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee, 14 U.S. (1
Wheat) 304, 343 (1816) (“It is imperative upon the state legislatures to make laws
prescribing the time, places, and manner of holding elections for senators and
representatives, and for electors of president and vice-president. And in these, as
well as some other cases, congress have a right to revise, amend, or supercede the
laws which may be passed by state legislatures.”). Article I, the Court recognized,
places state legislatures, “in some respects, under the control of congress.” Id. And
Congress has determined that, at times, preclearance is necessary. See 52 U.S.C.
§ 10302(c). Defendants’ argument lacks merit
Click to expand...

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/21564733/ndfl-voting.pdf
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top