It's in the OP that's what this thread is about and what's being discussed all over the news. I said in the OP that this would be THE story until election day and I was right, Clinton is toast, choke on it.
FBI to Indict Clinton
- Thread starter Face Your
- Start date
It's in the OP that's what this thread is about and what's being discussed all over the news. I said in the OP that this would be THE story until election day and I was right, Clinton is toast, choke on it.
evince
Truthmatters
Althea
Althea told me...
It's a lot deeper than that. Breitbart's funding comes from this guy.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/19/us/politics/robert-mercer-donald-trump-donor.html
It's been a revolving door between Mercer and Trump's campaign.
This will be a great few days for Clinton. I can't wait for Giuliani to be pressured for his sources inside the Breitbart wing of the FBI
zappasguitar
Well-known member
You are so full of shit!
If you'd bother to read other threads you'd know that Brett Baier has now RETRACTED HIS EARLIER CLAIM AND ADMITTED HE WAS WRONG.
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?74655-BREAKING-NEWS-Brett-Baier-is-FULL-OF-SHIT!
ROFL...In...Your...FACE!!
Althea
Althea told me...
I have him blocked. Let me know when he shows you his proof.
Some in the DOJ said that the FBI meeting was the strangest meeting they've ever attended.
Althea
Althea told me...
Kelly Ann Conway was hysterical last night when confronted with Baier's retraction. She was asked if Trump would correct his claims from yesterday's White Power gatherings, where he claimed 'an indictment is imminent'.
Conway...after being told she was punked by Breitbart:
"Yea, but....Clinton"
zappasguitar
Well-known member
The only proof he's got is his "Its in the OP...it's in the OP"
IOW...he's got NOTHING!
zappasguitar
Well-known member
I saw that...it was a thing of beauty!
The frenzied desperation of rabid Trumpkins will continue to grow over the next few days as it becomes apparent their messiah is doomed to failure.
We should witness Trumpkins doing some pretty embarrassing stuff before Tuesday!
Althea
Althea told me...
Again...I wanna see Giuliani's smug little smile turn back into that shitty face he had at the Al Smith dinner.
Does ANYONE fact check anything that they serve up?
Then again...Breitbart is running the campaign. They'll have their base.
Everyone else is laughing.
Sources for what? He didn't say anything about the FBI he said a surprise which could mean anything, this has nothing to Breitbart, Trump or anything else, it has to do with the ongoing year long FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation pay for play, there is no Breibart wing of the FBI you fucking nutjob there is the honest wing of the FBI which is sick of the Clinton corruption and obstruction infiltrating the highest echelons of the DOJ and FBI which is shielding her criminal activities. We have AG Loretta Lynch who got her first job from Bill Clinton meeting secretly with Clinton on the back of her plane while Hillary was under FBI investigation. Or how about the head of the DOJ's Clinton investigation assistant AG Peter Kadzik who is best friends with Clinton’s campaign manager John Podesta who was caught by wikileaks red handed giving a heads up to Podesta that his boss Hillary was coming under FBI investigation? Or how about the head of the FBI Clinton investigation Terry McAuliffe whose wifes campaign the Clinton’s donated half a million dollars to?
You're a laughable shill Giuliani doesn't have anything to do with this, neither does Trump or Breibart so save your fucktarded talking points for the Daily Kos circle jerk comments section they won't fly here.
There was no retraction you dumb cunt there was a clarification on the process the indictment would take moron:
“I want to be clear — I want to be clear about this,” he explained. “I pressed the sources again and again what would happen [if Hillary Clinton wins]. I got to the end of that and said, ‘They have a lot of evidence that would likely lead to an indictment.’”
“But that’s not, that’s inartfully answered,” Baier continued. “That’s not the process. That’s not how you do it. You have to have a prosecutor. If they don’t move forward with a prosecutor with the DOJ, there would be, I’m told, a very public call for an independent prosecutor to move forward.”
“There is confidence in the evidence, but for me to phrase it like I did, of course that got picked up everywhere, but the process is different than that.”
So like I said from the get barring DOJ interference there will be an indictment, he didn't retract anything he elaborated on the process which will lead to the indictment.
There was no retraction despite the lying title from raw story go eat some yellow snow you lying faggot:
“I want to be clear — I want to be clear about this,” he explained. “I pressed the sources again and again what would happen [if Hillary Clinton wins]. I got to the end of that and said, ‘They have a lot of evidence that would likely lead to an indictment.’”
“But that’s not, that’s inartfully answered,” Baier continued. “That’s not the process. That’s not how you do it. You have to have a prosecutor. If they don’t move forward with a prosecutor with the DOJ, there would be, I’m told, a very public call for an independent prosecutor to move forward.”
“There is confidence in the evidence, but for me to phrase it like I did, of course that got picked up everywhere, but the process is different than that.”
So like I said from the get barring DOJ interference there will be an indictment, he didn't retract anything he elaborated on the process which will lead to the indictment.
You already tried that in this thread and owned you with your own source with a bullshit title, he made no retraction whatsoever you lying faggot:
“I want to be clear — I want to be clear about this,” he explained. “I pressed the sources again and again what would happen [if Hillary Clinton wins]. I got to the end of that and said, ‘They have a lot of evidence that would likely lead to an indictment.’”
“But that’s not, that’s inartfully answered,” Baier continued. “That’s not the process. That’s not how you do it. You have to have a prosecutor. If they don’t move forward with a prosecutor with the DOJ, there would be, I’m told, a very public call for an independent prosecutor to move forward.”
“There is confidence in the evidence, but for me to phrase it like I did, of course that got picked up everywhere, but the process is different than that.”
So like I said from the get barring DOJ interference there will be an indictment, he didn't retract anything he elaborated on the process which will lead to the indictment.
Yes the FBI sources saying she will be indicted is in the OP.
They remained anonymous because they aren't supposed to divulge information on an ongoing investigation but they are sick of DOJ stonewalling.
Althea
Althea told me...
Here's a good review of the state of the Breitbart wing of the FBI, and their illegal actions.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...nces-could-be-immense/?utm_term=.227645b1d26e
There is no Breibart wing of the FBI you fucking nutjob there is the honest wing of the FBI which is sick of the Clinton corruption and obstruction infiltrating the highest echelons of the DOJ and FBI which is shielding her criminal activities. We have AG Loretta Lynch who got her first job from Bill Clinton meeting secretly with Clinton on the back of her plane while Hillary was under FBI investigation. Or how about the head of the DOJ's Clinton investigation assistant AG Peter Kadzik who is best friends with Clinton’s campaign manager John Podesta who was caught by wikileaks red handed giving a heads up to Podesta that his boss Hillary was coming under FBI investigation? Or how about the head of the FBI Clinton investigation Terry McAuliffe whose wifes campaign the Clinton’s donated half a million dollars to?