FBI to Indict Clinton

Face said:
You might even say I'm deplorable but the fact remains that Hillary is going to prison and this story just destroyed any chance at her Presidential bid.
Click to expand...

That is the Fox News hope. They only have believers in the GOP. No one who may be swayed by invented news listens to Fox. Their reputation precedes them.

You are deplorable. You are a deplorable racist scum bag.
No one here at JPP would dispute that fact.
 
Face said:
Once again it is CNN and MSNBC that were proven to have actively colluded with a Presidential campaign, and yes Fox has conservative talk show hosts like Hannity and O'Reilly just like MSNBC has , but Bret Baier is not a commentator he is a journalist.
Click to expand...

Rachel Maddow has a phd


she is a rodes scholor
 
Leonthecat said:
There are no journalists at Fox News.
Journalists wouldn't report made up news.
Click to expand...

Again you are thinking of MSNBC and CNN who again have been proven to have colluded with the Clinton campaign, would you care to provide similar evidence of Fox collusion? No? Thought not. This is not made up news he has not one but two sources from the FBI investigations of the Clinton Slush Fund Foundation. You're done it's over, your candidate and half her staff are going to prison, better luck with your treason next time.
 
evince said:
Rachel Maddow has a phd


she is a rodes scholor
Click to expand...

And that makes her not a left wing political hack how exactly? Do you understand the difference between a journalist and a commentator? You don't do you? This is why we need voting tests to stop low information IQ deficient niggers like you.
 
Leonthecat said:
That is the Fox News hope. They only have believers in the GOP. No one who may be swayed by invented news listens to Fox. Their reputation precedes them.

You are deplorable. You are a deplorable racist scum bag.
No one here at JPP would dispute that fact.
Click to expand...

Once again it is CNN and MSNBC that were proven to have actively colluded with a Presidential campaign, and yes Fox has conservative talk show hosts like Hannity and O'Reilly just like MSNBC has Rachel Maddow, but Bret Baier is not a commentator he is a journalist.

This is why we need voting tests, genetically IQ deficient niggers like you don't even know the difference between journalism and commentary.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
ROFL...Brett Baier?

As if citing the opinion of another partisan talking head with CDS lends credence to your idiotic claims.

No wonder no one takes your posts seriously.
Click to expand...


and now at last, the TRUTH comes out!

Oops: Fox anchor retracts claim of ‘likely’ Clinton indictment after conservatives sites go wild
 
Face said:
And that makes her not a left wing political hack how exactly? Do you understand the difference between a journalist and a commentator? You don't do you? This is why we need voting tests to stop low information IQ deficient niggers like you.
Click to expand...

look you rat dicked racist scum



she is 1000 times more qualified
 
ZappasGuitar said:
and now at last, the TRUTH comes out!

Oops: Fox anchor retracts claim of ‘likely’ Clinton indictment after conservatives sites go wild
Click to expand...

Yep just as I thought a misleading title from the laughable raw story propaganda mill, here is what he actually said and it is not a retraction:


“I want to be clear — I want to be clear about this,” he explained. “I pressed the sources again and again what would happen [if Hillary Clinton wins]. I got to the end of that and said, ‘They have a lot of evidence that would likely lead to an indictment.’”

“But that’s not, that’s inartfully answered,” Baier continued. “That’s not the process. That’s not how you do it. You have to have a prosecutor. If they don’t move forward with a prosecutor with the DOJ, there would be, I’m told, a very public call for an independent prosecutor to move forward.”

“There is confidence in the evidence, but for me to phrase it like I did, of course that got picked up everywhere, but the process is different than that.”

So like I said from the get barring DOJ interference there will be an indictment, he didn't retract anything he elaborated on the process which will lead to the indictment.
 
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/11/oop...indictment-after-conservatives-sites-go-wild/



Fox News anchor Bret Baier admitted on Thursday that he had been wrong when he reported that Hillary Clinton would “likely” be indicted by federal authorities, a claim that sent conservative websites into a frenzy.
“We talked to two separate sources with intimate knowledge of the FBI investigations,” Baier explained on his Wednesday program. “The Clinton Foundation investigation is far more expansive than anybody has reported so far… Several offices separately have been doing their own investigations.”
“They are actively and aggressively pursuing this case,” the anchor insisted. “The investigations will continue, there is a lot of evidence. And barring some obstruction in some way, they believe they will continue to likely an indictment.”
 
evince said:
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/11/oop...indictment-after-conservatives-sites-go-wild/



Fox News anchor Bret Baier admitted on Thursday that he had been wrong when he reported that Hillary Clinton would be indicted by federal authorities, a claim that sent conservative websites into a frenzy.
We talked to two separate sources with intimate knowledge of the FBI investigations; Baier explained on his Wednesday program. The Clinton Foundation investigation is far more expansive than anybody has reported so far Several offices separately have been doing their own investigations. They are actively and aggressively pursuing this the anchor insisted. The investigations will continue, there is a lot of evidence. And barring some obstruction in some way, they believe they will continue to likely an indictment.
Click to expand...

Yep just as I thought a bullshit claim from the laughable raw story propaganda mill, here is what he actually said and it is not a retraction in any way, shape, or form:


“I want to be clear — I want to be clear about this,” he explained. “I pressed the sources again and again what would happen [if Hillary Clinton wins]. I got to the end of that and said, ‘They have a lot of evidence that would likely lead to an indictment.’”

“But that’s not, that’s inartfully answered,” Baier continued. “That’s not the process. That’s not how you do it. You have to have a prosecutor. If they don’t move forward with a prosecutor with the DOJ, there would be, I’m told, a very public call for an independent prosecutor to move forward.”

“There is confidence in the evidence, but for me to phrase it like I did, of course that got picked up everywhere, but the process is different than that.”

So like I said from the get barring DOJ interference there will be an indictment, he didn't retract anything he elaborated on the process which will lead to the indictment.
 
Face said:
Yep just as I thought a bullshit claim from the laughable raw story propaganda mill, here is what he actually said and it is not a retraction in any way, shape, or form:


“I want to be clear — I want to be clear about this,” he explained. “I pressed the sources again and again what would happen [if Hillary Clinton wins]. I got to the end of that and said, ‘They have a lot of evidence that would likely lead to an indictment.’”

“But that’s not, that’s inartfully answered,” Baier continued. “That’s not the process. That’s not how you do it. You have to have a prosecutor. If they don’t move forward with a prosecutor with the DOJ, there would be, I’m told, a very public call for an independent prosecutor to move forward.”

“There is confidence in the evidence, but for me to phrase it like I did, of course that got picked up everywhere, but the process is different than that.”

So like I said from the get barring DOJ interference there will be an indictment, he didn't retract anything he elaborated on the process which will lead to the indictment.
Click to expand...
don't expect them to follow it. they are still in denial that there are FBI investigations in to the Clinton Foundation
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top