I think one would have a stronger argument blaming our decaying culture than the actual gun. But, given the socialists nazi proclivity to want to ban our only method of self defense, I am not surprised by the simplistic thinking.
I would argue that if more people were armed, there would have been a better chance at stopping this nut job in his tracks. Under your scenario the victims are left to waiting for the police who could take upwards of 10-15 minutes to arrive. Fewer people would have been injured had more been armed and took the fucker out. Much like this brave elderly man. Imagine the carnage if he hadn't been there?
http://lewrockwell.com/spl4/heroic-armed-citizen.html
Now, I have proof my way works. You? You just blindly follow a nazi policy
You're just as fucking crazy as this idiot:
WASHINGTON -- Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) said Friday that the shootings that took place in an Aurora, Colo. movie theater hours earlier were a result of "ongoing attacks on Judeo-Christian beliefs" and questioned why nobody else in the theater had a gun to take down the shooter.
During a radio interview on The Heritage Foundation's "Istook Live!" show, Gohmert was asked why he believes such senseless acts of violence take place. Gohmert responded by talking about the weakening of Christian values in the country.
"You know what really gets me, as a Christian, is to see the ongoing attacks on Judeo-Christian beliefs, and then some senseless crazy act of a derelict takes place," Gohmert said.
and I say that attempting to deprive me of a tool to defend my life means you do not value my life.
You too. If you quit being like fucking Rambo, you wouldn't need guns to defend your life.