False outrage against HRC?

christiefan915 said:
"Responding to congressional demands for emails in connection with its investigation into the partisan firing of eight U.S. attorneys, the White House announced that as many as five million emails, covering a two-year span, had been lost."
Click to expand...

Ever wonder how many emails that bypassed the government completely, were destroyed over the 5 and a half year span that passed through Hillary's private unsecured server.....

Emails that we now know, undeniably contained top secret and sensitive intelligence.......unmarked because they bypassed gov. in the first place.
 
christiefan915 said:
Call me crazy but I don't understand this level of hatred. It goes way beyond partisan politics.
Click to expand...

Your level of "they did it too" bullshit goes way way beyond a sane response to whats been discovered about Hillary emails and the Benghazi lies and cover up....
 
NOVA said:
All firing of US Attorneys is partisan.....was any investigation launched to see why Clinton fired every one of them....any reason given like was demanded of Bush.....
Did Clinton even need a reason other than they weren't HIS men.....

First, allow me to place something out into the open and the bright light of day. US Attorneys hold their offices at 'the pleasure of the President of the United States' and are at-will employees. These attorneys may be fired by any current POTUS, at any time and for any reason. That is what "at-will" means.

As an example, during Democrat President Clinton's Administration all 93 US Attorneys were fired. Note: President George W. Bush has fired only 8. And during President H. W. Bush's term of office, US Attorneys were also fired. But, President G. W. Bush is not being afforded the same "rights" as are other presidents. Democrats are now loudly shouting — if not yet overtly at least implicitly: "President George W. Bush does not have the same rights as other presidents of the United States!"

How many did Obama fire ?.....The net is practically devoid of practical information for some reason.....
Click to expand...

^ Wrong. bush fired 91 out of 93 during 2001. They controversy arose because he fired his own appointees halfway through his 2nd term for spurious reasons.

As for Obama, he was still using about 1/3 of the bush staff by the end of his first year and then started replacing them. I'm still trying to find out more.

MONDAY, MARCH 14, 2001
WWW.USDOJ.GOV

WHITE HOUSE AND JUSTICE DEPARTMENT
BEGIN U.S. ATTORNEY TRANSITION

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Continuing the practice of new administrations, President Bush and the Department of Justice have begun the transition process for most of the 93 United States Attorneys.

Attorney General Ashcroft said, "We are committed to making this an orderly transition to ensure effective, professional law enforcement that reflects the President 's priorities."
In January of this year, nearly all presidential appointees from the previous administration offered their resignations. Two Justice Department exceptions were the United States Attorneys and United States Marshals.

Prior to the beginning of this transition process, nearly one-third of the United States Attorneys had already submitted their resignations. The White House and the Department of Justice have begun to schedule transition dates for most of the remaining United States Attorneys to occur prior to June of this year. President Bush will make announcements regarding his nominations to the Senate of new United States Attorneys as that information becomes available. Pending confirmation of the President's nominees, the Attorney General will make appointments of Interim United States Attorneys for a period of 120 days (28USC546). Upon the expiration of that appointment, the authority rests with the United States District Court (28USC546(d)).
​
 
NOVA said:
Your level of "they did it too" bullshit goes way way beyond a sane response to whats been discovered about Hillary emails and the Benghazi lies and cover up....
Click to expand...

Please. People always found a reason to hate Hillary dating back to when she was FLOTUS.
 
"There should be no bank too big to fail and no individual too big to jail." —Hillary

Hillary and I agree.
 
Jarod said:
Which of your "scandals" are you pretending she is going to need pardoning for now?
Click to expand...

Well, she can't be prosecuted for lying to the public about Benghazi

She can't be prosecuted for lying to the parents of those murdered in Benghazi
--------------
She can be prosecuted for lying about not sending and receiving classified gov. intelligence and information.

She can be prosecuted for setting up a private, unsecured server for the purpose of bypassing gov. official scrutiny....

She can be prosecuted for allowing her lawyer, who has no clearances, to see and possess her classified emails....

but she will be protected by the Obama administrations lower level appointees without Obama personally getting involved.....she is above the law, as we've all suspected for months now.
 
christiefan915 said:
Please. People always found a reason to hate Hillary dating back to when she was FLOTUS.
Click to expand...


I don't know about who or how many actually 'hate' her....but there is certainly no reason to like her, vote for her, or believe anything she says......
there is no doubt she's been a failure as Sec. of State.....no noteworthy accomplishments to speak of......
 
christiefan915 said:
No I didn't make up anything.

"Even for a Republican White House that was badly stumbling through George W. Bush’s sixth year in office, the revelation on April 12, 2007 was shocking. Responding to congressional demands for emails in connection with its investigation into the partisan firing of eight U.S. attorneys, the White House announced that as many as five million emails, covering a two-year span, had been lost."
Click to expand...

Are you still trying to imply that the replacement (firing) of US attorneys by other presidents, including Clinton and Obama, is not ALWAYS partisan ..

You must at least have your GED and understand reality don't you......and you think others are partisan but not you....

And, Congress had no right to demand an investigation for something that is a President's prerogative to do for any reason or no reason....as presidents have
done before Bush and after Bush....
 
christiefan915 said:
First you asked if I made up a Congressional investigation, as if there wasn't any, then you refer to the investigation that you think I made up right in the above post.
Click to expand...
there was no investigation of missing emails.......there was in inquiry into firing prosecutors, which turned out to be business as usual........
 
PostmodernProphet said:
feel free to link to any post of mine stating that.......
Click to expand...

Actually, feel free to post anything that proves that claim.....although, legislating from the oval office is not his job....nor his right, which he has said numerous times himself....

you might find something from Rush Limbaugh or Hannity or someone like that....
 
christiefan915 said:
I believe when the current investigation is finished it will find exactly what the previous ones did, that there was no deliberate attempt by anybody to cover up what happened in Benghazi.
Click to expand...

so they accidentally claimed the Benghazi attack was caused by a movie?......the investigations have already proved there was a cover up.........the only issue is whether Hillary thought it up or Obama did.......
 
christiefan915 said:
How do you know there was nothing top secret on bush's server? Pretty suspicious that they'd be destroyed. But the main point is the double standard of the right.
Click to expand...

Are you trying to say that Bush's private E-mail was the only one he had.
Grow the fuck up.
Hillary lied, got caught, continued to lie, her lie was uncovered, and you're just pissed.
 
NOVA said:
Ever wonder how many emails that bypassed the government completely, were destroyed over the 5 and a half year span that passed through Hillary's private unsecured server.....

Emails that we now know, undeniably contained top secret and sensitive intelligence.......unmarked because they bypassed gov. in the first place.
Click to expand...

You do understand that almost nothing is totally destroyed on computers and a talented expert can recover supposedly lost information.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top