False outrage against HRC?

PostmodernProphet said:
oh Chrispie, did you just make up a Congressional investigation?.......
Click to expand...

No I didn't make up anything.

"Even for a Republican White House that was badly stumbling through George W. Bush’s sixth year in office, the revelation on April 12, 2007 was shocking. Responding to congressional demands for emails in connection with its investigation into the partisan firing of eight U.S. attorneys, the White House announced that as many as five million emails, covering a two-year span, had been lost."
 
PostmodernProphet said:
for there to be a double standard we would have had to find the emails that were supposedly destroyed, discovered they were top secret instead of personal, and have had some reason to look at them in the first place.......
Click to expand...

"Responding to congressional demands for emails in connection with its investigation into the partisan firing of eight U.S. attorneys, the White House announced that as many as five million emails, covering a two-year span, had been lost."
 
It is really going to be fun to watch these Cons heads explode when she is elected in November!

Is it possible they actually hate her more than they hate the current president?
 
Jarod said:
It is really going to be fun to watch these Cons heads explode when she is elected in November!

Is it possible they actually hate her more than they hate the current president?
Click to expand...

Call me crazy but I don't understand this level of hatred. It goes way beyond partisan politics.
 
christiefan915 said:
No I didn't make up anything.
Click to expand...

sure you did.....all emails in connection to the investigation were submitted except those that had been destroyed........the difference in Hillary's situation is that while she said the emails had been destroyed, that turned out to be a lie.......and when they finally got around all her efforts to hide them they turned out to contain classified information.........do you see a distinct difference in circumstances here?.........destroyed emails were not significant factors in either investigation........what were significant were emails that had been lied about.......
 
christiefan915 said:
Post 54.
Click to expand...

You'll have to point it out to me.....Curcial evidence of what ? Was a crime committed ?

So is there some law that says you can fire 90 US attorneys at the start of your term but not in mid term......

Is there some law that says you have to give reasons to fire US attorneys sometimes but not all the time.....

or is it that only Republicans cannot fire US attorneys when they see fit....but not Democrats ?
 
Remember when they were sure Presidemt Obama was going to be impeached instead of reelected?
 
PostmodernProphet said:
sure you did.....all emails in connection to the investigation were submitted except those that had been destroyed........the difference in Hillary's situation is that while she said the emails had been destroyed, that turned out to be a lie.......and when they finally got around all her efforts to hide them they turned out to contain classified information.........do you see a distinct difference in circumstances here?.........destroyed emails were not significant factors in either investigation........what were significant were emails that had been lied about.......
Click to expand...

First you asked if I made up a Congressional investigation, as if there wasn't any, then you refer to the investigation that you think I made up right in the above post.
 
Remember when Obama was going to be impeached for fast and furious, IRS, Benghazi, heck I can't remember em all....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
and your evidence that it was a lie and the emails hadn't been destroyed?......
Click to expand...

Good lord, please follow the chronology of the posts, I'm not talking about that. I'm saying that the emails were destroyed because in some way they were damaging to bush.

Furthermore, I want investigators to look at all of Hillary's emails because I think it will end up the way other investigations have ended, with nothing criminal found. I believe when the current investigation is finished it will find exactly what the previous ones did, that there was no deliberate attempt by anybody to cover up what happened in Benghazi.

I think cons are becoming unhinged over Hillary and this current issue is no different from when they became unhinged over the birth certificate.
 
christiefan915 said:
"Responding to congressional demands for emails in connection with its investigation into the partisan firing of eight U.S. attorneys"
Click to expand...

All firing of US Attorneys is partisan.....was any investigation launched to see why Clinton fired every one of them....any reason given like was demanded of Bush.....
Did Clinton even need a reason other than they weren't HIS men.....

First, allow me to place something out into the open and the bright light of day. US Attorneys hold their offices at 'the pleasure of the President of the United States' and are at-will employees. These attorneys may be fired by any current POTUS, at any time and for any reason. That is what "at-will" means.

As an example, during Democrat President Clinton's Administration all 93 US Attorneys were fired. Note: President George W. Bush has fired only 8. And during President H. W. Bush's term of office, US Attorneys were also fired. But, President G. W. Bush is not being afforded the same "rights" as are other presidents. Democrats are now loudly shouting — if not yet overtly at least implicitly: "President George W. Bush does not have the same rights as other presidents of the United States!"

How many did Obama fire ?.....The net is practically devoid of practical information for some reason.....
 
christiefan915 said:
No I didn't make up anything.

"Even for a Republican White House that was badly stumbling through George W. Bush’s sixth year in office, the revelation on April 12, 2007 was shocking. Responding to congressional demands for emails in connection with its investigation into the partisan firing of eight U.S. attorneys, the White House announced that as many as five million emails, covering a two-year span, had been lost."
Click to expand...

Who cares if it was partisan? Presidents can fire who they want for whatever reason. Non scandal.
 
christiefan915 said:
Good lord, please follow the chronology of the posts, I'm not talking about that. I'm saying that the emails were destroyed because in some way they were damaging to bush.

Furthermore, I want investigators to look at all of Hillary's emails because I think it will end up the way other investigations have ended, with nothing criminal found. I believe when the current investigation is finished it will find exactly what the previous ones did, that there was no deliberate attempt by anybody to cover up what happened in Benghazi.

I think cons are becoming unhinged over Hillary and this current issue is no different from when they became unhinged over the birth certificate.
Click to expand...

You're saying that the emails were destroyed because in some way they were damaging to bush. No proof, no nothing, just your partisan view.....really?

The FBI and State Dept. have looked at Hillarys emails and found top secret information there, in an unsecured, private server....information that went directly to her, bypassing
any inspection or judgement by the security people.....but you are right, she will get away with it....Hillary is above the law....Democrats are above the law....and they take
care of one another.....they done an investigation on themselves and found no wronging at all.....wonderful.

The cover up of why and who attacked and murdered our people in Benghazi is already public knowledge....it was a spontaneous demonstration because of an internet video, I believe...

Thats what she told the public and the parents of those that were killed......thats still the story right ?

Yeah,......rrrrrrriiighhtttt.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top