I didn't bring up India, and the discussion moved to broader areas of British military atrocities, so it was all absolutely on topic.
Unlike your frequent outbursts of Tinker Pride, which I fully admit that I was ignorant of the existence of Tinker Pride. For that I thank you.
The Nationalists would naturally boycott such an election because it was not a "national" referendum, but rather a gerrymandered and limited one. I think that's been established quite a few times already. Is that really a difficult concept for you to understand?
Try to imagine border areas stretching from Texas to the Pacific Ocean where there are Mexican-American majorities, holding referendums to rejoin those areas to Mexico. And suppose the remainder of the USA was excluded from those referendums. Would that be a valid national referendum?
Northern Ireland is an illegitimate entity, and if all of the Irish people were permitted vote on the matter, and practice their own self-determination, it would not exist.